So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Didn't see the match myself.
Was a bit surprised he was brought back in so quickly esp given that he's always been more of a running back than a key back.
Was a bit surprised he was brought back in so quickly esp given that he's always been more of a running back than a key back.
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Thought last week he just needs more time, but because we're short on defenders, we don't have that option when you loose Fisher and Blake to the ruck. Not his fault. Just needs time. I thought Raph may have come in. We just have a few key injuries.
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Not a great game, important player for us with Fisher out and Blake rucking for periods.
Maybe this year?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Was slow, his skills were off, he appeared fumbly and was badly beaten. Reminded me a bit of the Gwilt 2007/08 model.
However not everyone comes back from a reco like Lenny. Also I reckon Gwilts best position is HBF. He's never been a great KP player taking the best fwd. It's nights like this you realise that we actually do miss Zac. I can't recall Zac ever having a massive bag kicked on him.
However not everyone comes back from a reco like Lenny. Also I reckon Gwilts best position is HBF. He's never been a great KP player taking the best fwd. It's nights like this you realise that we actually do miss Zac. I can't recall Zac ever having a massive bag kicked on him.
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Then you don't remember him playing Barry Hall or Buddy?Moods wrote:Was slow, his skills were off, he appeared fumbly and was badly beaten. Reminded me a bit of the Gwilt 2007/08 model.
However not everyone comes back from a reco like Lenny. Also I reckon Gwilts best position is HBF. He's never been a great KP player taking the best fwd. It's nights like this you realise that we actually do miss Zac. I can't recall Zac ever having a massive bag kicked on him.
Bad management is bad management
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
2nd game back i can't expect or judge him to much... caught out a bit at times but hey guy had a reco!skeptic wrote:Didn't see the match myself.
Was a bit surprised he was brought back in so quickly esp given that he's always been more of a running back than a key back.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3664 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Sounds like Raph may have been a better choice as he tends to play taller
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Jack kicked 7 goals last year... fairly sure Zac was playing.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18655
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1994 times
- Been thanked: 873 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Just average. His timing is off and he's not got his full confidence back yet
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Gwilt played on Hall and had PLENTY of help from other defenders. He is not a full back. Blake is our best bet down there with the others helping out.SydneySainter wrote:Then you don't remember him playing Barry Hall or Buddy?Moods wrote:Was slow, his skills were off, he appeared fumbly and was badly beaten. Reminded me a bit of the Gwilt 2007/08 model.
However not everyone comes back from a reco like Lenny. Also I reckon Gwilts best position is HBF. He's never been a great KP player taking the best fwd. It's nights like this you realise that we actually do miss Zac. I can't recall Zac ever having a massive bag kicked on him.
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
wasn't he on Vickery most of the night? Vickery had what, 1 kick. Did his job first, perhaps a move should have been made onto Riewoldt when Blake rucked, felt for simpkin. Should have never been or Riewoldt. Gwilt was rusty with touch though and needs to force himself to become designated kicker, rather than ball coming our with Gilbert/Blake.
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
He was fine defensively.
Little rusty though.
May as well find his form in the seniors given Fisher is out injured.
Little rusty though.
May as well find his form in the seniors given Fisher is out injured.
- Austinnn
- Club Player
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:02pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 2 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Winmar wrote:He was pretty average really. Thankfully we know he will improve.
Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------
You'll Never Walk Alone
------------------------------------------------
You'll Never Walk Alone
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Zac always killed buddy rid wold got the better of us thoughSydneySainter wrote:Then you don't remember him playing Barry Hall or Buddy?Moods wrote:Was slow, his skills were off, he appeared fumbly and was badly beaten. Reminded me a bit of the Gwilt 2007/08 model.
However not everyone comes back from a reco like Lenny. Also I reckon Gwilts best position is HBF. He's never been a great KP player taking the best fwd. It's nights like this you realise that we actually do miss Zac. I can't recall Zac ever having a massive bag kicked on him.
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Zac always killed buddy? I'd go back and check your stats.gringo wrote:Zac always killed buddy rid wold got the better of us thoughSydneySainter wrote:Then you don't remember him playing Barry Hall or Buddy?Moods wrote:Was slow, his skills were off, he appeared fumbly and was badly beaten. Reminded me a bit of the Gwilt 2007/08 model.
However not everyone comes back from a reco like Lenny. Also I reckon Gwilts best position is HBF. He's never been a great KP player taking the best fwd. It's nights like this you realise that we actually do miss Zac. I can't recall Zac ever having a massive bag kicked on him.
Bad management is bad management
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19160
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
He played a good month in the VFL so there was not much that could be achieved by keeping him there. Second week back is always the hard game especially on a six day turn around. He needs a bit more time but he'll be ok.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7088
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Had a stinker. Doesn't have the confidence yet and looks significantly slower. The long, raking left foot is producing shanks like never before.
Hopefully he's just taking a little while to get used to the pace of the game again. Like the rest of the defence he'll benefit hugely from the return of Fisher, Geary and also McEvoy (who both drops back and allows Blake to take his usual CHB).
Hopefully he's just taking a little while to get used to the pace of the game again. Like the rest of the defence he'll benefit hugely from the return of Fisher, Geary and also McEvoy (who both drops back and allows Blake to take his usual CHB).
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
a long way off getting that old strength back through his hips and legs.
he used to always just bust tackles. he looks a bit hesitant and proppy. the bye will do him good.
just send him to the gym for a weeks.
he used to always just bust tackles. he looks a bit hesitant and proppy. the bye will do him good.
just send him to the gym for a weeks.
- hungry for a premiership
- Club Player
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Fri 08 Oct 2010 2:01am
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
His game against Richmond was below AFL standard. Still clearly underdone. Needs a month or two of senior footy under his belt before he can reasonably be expected to get his form back to a consistently high level. Should be peaking around finals time. Hopefully we're there.
BTW if you think Collingwood, Essendon, and Hawthorn supporters are bad, last night I witnessed that they are as a drop is to the ocean in comparison to the arrogance, bias and one-eyedness that emanates from the filth section of the Tiger faithful. And it's a very large section. It wasn't all that bad last night because they're still not quite clear of the woods yet and some doubt still remains in their minds, but Lenny help us if they should become a top four team, because the potential scope for what a bunch of awful pricks that club and it's supporters could turn out to be is enormous. Whatever soft spot I had for Richmond is now dead and buried because it's beyond an understatement to say that it would really get my goat if, after we've been a class or three above them for fifteen years, they go on and win another premiership before we do.
BTW if you think Collingwood, Essendon, and Hawthorn supporters are bad, last night I witnessed that they are as a drop is to the ocean in comparison to the arrogance, bias and one-eyedness that emanates from the filth section of the Tiger faithful. And it's a very large section. It wasn't all that bad last night because they're still not quite clear of the woods yet and some doubt still remains in their minds, but Lenny help us if they should become a top four team, because the potential scope for what a bunch of awful pricks that club and it's supporters could turn out to be is enormous. Whatever soft spot I had for Richmond is now dead and buried because it's beyond an understatement to say that it would really get my goat if, after we've been a class or three above them for fifteen years, they go on and win another premiership before we do.
"Too big, too strong, too whatever."
- hungry for a premiership
- Club Player
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Fri 08 Oct 2010 2:01am
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Leo.J wrote:Not many come back as strongly and quickly as Lenny.
Our whole backline couldn't of done too well considering the score we had kicked on us.
Our back-line stocks were short coming into the season and have been further depleted with injuries - no doubt we're doing it tough in that department.
But it was by no means entirely the backs fault that we had such a score kicked on us - their midfield spread was cutting us to ribbons!
"Too big, too strong, too whatever."
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3127
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 72 times
Re: So what did we think of Gwilt's game?
Agreed..hungry for a premiership wrote:Leo.J wrote:Not many come back as strongly and quickly as Lenny.
Our whole backline couldn't of done too well considering the score we had kicked on us.
Our back-line stocks were short coming into the season and have been further depleted with injuries - no doubt we're doing it tough in that department.
But it was by no means entirely the backs fault that we had such a score kicked on us - their midfield spread was cutting us to ribbons!
I'm just curious why Gwilt has been singled out.