Not the runner again!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Not the runner again!

Post: # 1224780Post meher baba »

Aaaaaaaargh!!!!


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Austinnn
Club Player
Posts: 1533
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 6:02pm
Location: France
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1224818Post Austinnn »

You'd think Hudson would know better. Sheesh.


Just My Opinion
------------------------------------------------

You'll Never Walk Alone
User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1224875Post Solar »

why was it a free? How did he effect the play. Did not stop the ball, did not block a player. The richmond player kicked it to him. Pathetic umpiring like usual.


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1224897Post meher baba »

Solar wrote:why was it a free? How did he effect the play. Did not stop the ball, did not block a player. The richmond player kicked it to him. Pathetic umpiring like usual.
Good grief!! Even I'm not that one- eyed. It's the runner's responsibility to keep out of the play. The fact that the Tigers player kicked it towards him is no excuse whatsoever. Look at the rules.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225118Post Life Long Saint »

meher baba wrote:
Solar wrote:why was it a free? How did he effect the play. Did not stop the ball, did not block a player. The richmond player kicked it to him. Pathetic umpiring like usual.
Good grief!! Even I'm not that one- eyed. It's the runner's responsibility to keep out of the play. The fact that the Tigers player kicked it towards him is no excuse whatsoever. Look at the rules.
I thought it was a harsh call...The kick went to two of our blokes off the side of the Richmond player's boot. Not a tiger player for 20m!


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10517
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1345 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225126Post CURLY »

Was a crap call by the umpire. If you have no options up the ground just kick it to the runner.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
wasaintsfan
Club Player
Posts: 1315
Joined: Tue 15 Sep 2009 10:28pm
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225131Post wasaintsfan »

i think it was a poor place to be by runner... but it was a kick off the side of the boot that put it out there.... surely the runner cant be blamed because a professional cant kick a ball????? but was technically there i guess :(


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225140Post kosifantutti »

Later in the game, the Richmond runner ducked under the ball as it was being passed to another Tiger. He seemed a lot closer to it than Hudson and wasn't caught out by a kick off the side of the boot.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225144Post St Ick »

My god... the runner was 10m from the interchange gates and the kick came off the side of his boot. Gwilt was 5m off the ball and the runner was in Gwilts way. Runner got in the way in the last 1/4 too but nothing done about it. Was a howler of a decision.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225148Post meher baba »

I agree that the Richmond player's kick came off the side of the boot, but our runner was very exposed.

Somehow the runners from other teams seem generally to be able to avoid these situations, but ours quite often don't!!


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225156Post Verdun66 »

Was dead unlucky. Shocking kick put him under the gun. Clearly if in trouble kick it at the runner and get a free. New tactic, bit like the free man coming off the bench. Dennis Cometti called it un-Australian. Good line.


wallbanger
Club Player
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005 10:38am
Location: Geelong

Re: Not the runner again!

Post: # 1225593Post wallbanger »

I thought it was a poor decision too - what was he supposed to do? Was running to the bench, it was a poor, ill-directed kick that was suddenly coming straight at him - was he expected to just disappear into thin air? Didn't touch the pill, his being there didn't alter the outcome of the kick or the play at all - ludicrous.

Was watching the game with a Richmond, Geelong and Hawthorn supporter who all agreed it was a poor decision.


Please...let's win a Premiership before GEELONG!!!! (O.k., so we've missed that opportunity...maybe let's win the next one before Geelong????)
Post Reply