Tigers? Seriously?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224439Post SMS »

I can not WAIT for 11pm tomorrow night! The tioger fans realising they are in fact 1. NOT the best in the league ... 2. Are a LONG way from it.

1 good win in 25 years and they come out swingin!!

We are a better side (still after 12 years of dominating them)

Kosi and rooey will run riot ... what defender of theres can go with them? Not to mention the milne, saad and schnieder factor. (yes schnieds will play!)

Blake will run that mulleted, cross eyed, degenerate so hard his eyes will actually go normal for a few minutes!!

They will run into REAL taggersd in dempster and Jones ... the hardness of the saints will be too much and even without our best backman and ruckman WE WILL WIN EASILY. 30+ points.

As I said can NOT wait for the tiger letdown.


Ralphy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed 20 Feb 2008 8:26pm
Location: Morwell Gippsland Australia
Contact:

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224449Post Ralphy »

Schneids will play?


TJMcCarthy
Club Player
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat 04 Feb 2012 10:10pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224452Post TJMcCarthy »

Good post . I love an optimist. Proudly confident.

Arrive early and warm your vocal chords, it will be very loud at the docks on Friday night.


Strength Through Unity - CAR'N THE SAINTS!
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224457Post perfectionist »

Despite what the Channel 7 reporter said tonight (that we have won the 15 against the Tigers), our last game was a draw (I was on MI6 duty in Hobart). Prior to that, we had won the previous 13, a club record against any team. Without doubt, the skill differential has been steadily diminishing since 2006 when we beat them by 103 points (a club record against the Tigers). We will have to produce our A grade defensive game to stop their run. The bookies have it line ball or slightly in our favour. Which is about right. Go Saints!


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224462Post SMS »

Saints by 43


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224519Post plugger66 »

SMS wrote:Saints by 43

Is there 2 of you. Arent you the bloke who lost the plot against the Hawks. I really hope you are 10 years old. And please dont post if we happen to lose tomorrow night.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19164
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224526Post SaintPav »

This is a 50 50 game and I'd probably have them slight favourites. I don't think the tigers will fold like they have in the past or suffer any let down. Love to be wrong though.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Discher
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2012 12:39am

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224537Post Discher »

First post so here goes . I've watched a couple of Richmond games as I have a couple of there blokes in super coach.
They're not the same rabble we've been beating up for god knows how long. They do have some players of concern.
Our mids will have to be switched right on as they do have some speed through there. There back line is full of nobody's but they are doing a good job. Fwds are crap we are fine there.

They do attack the ball hard same as us & I expect there will be some injurys both ways.
Reckon we'll outlast them in a slug fest but we will have to take far more seriously


User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224538Post Iceman234 »

Hey Dish,

good to see you here at last.

:-)


Image
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8585
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1535 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224548Post kosifantutti »

SaintPav wrote:This is a 50 50 game
That would have been a distinct possibility under our old coach but the scores will be much higher than that.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224549Post Verdun66 »

kosifantutti wrote:
SaintPav wrote:This is a 50 50 game
That would have been a distinct possibility under our old coach but the scores will be much higher than that.
I see what you did there Kosi.....

Personally, I don't care how we do it, just want to win.


OneEyedSainter77
SS Life Member
Posts: 3792
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 10:24pm

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224551Post OneEyedSainter77 »

kosifantutti wrote:
SaintPav wrote:This is a 50 50 game
That would have been a distinct possibility under our old coach but the scores will be much higher than that.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Underrated post


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1994 times
Been thanked: 873 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224556Post bigcarl »

Luckily the club won't be arrogant or stupid enough to take the Tigers lightly. They are a good side, playing good football and spanked Hawthorn last week.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224594Post meher baba »

IMO, the key to stopping the Tigers is stopping J Riewoldt. Assuming that the Tigers play their usual style of game and don't flood, I believe we are likely to score at least 85 points, and possibly over 100. On my assessment, unless Riewoldt gets a bag, the Tigers are always going to struggle to kick over 100: they don't seem to have enough other strikepower in their forward line.

So, whoever plays on Jack needs to have one of their better games. Then we'll be pretty safe IMO.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9156
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224596Post spert »

The Tiges are improving, but their forward line is very hit and miss, and their backs will have trouble with Roo and Kosi together in the forward line. The game will be won or lost in the midfield and I would like to see a really big effort from NDS and Montagna


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224599Post meher baba »

Casting my eye once again over the current Tigers lineup, they have some good individual players: Newman, Delidio, Riewoldt, Foley, Cotchin, Tuck (up to a point). But, taken all in all, there is more of a reliance on GOPs and developing youngsters than a club would ideally like to have. Even the Tigers midfield, which Watters has publicly identified as a threat, isn't clearly superior to ours.

But Hardwick has done a great job at getting them to work together as a team and I believe that, after many, many years of disappointment, the Tigers fans might at last have something to look forward to over the next few seasons. If the improvement continues, I reckon they'll really hit their stride come about 2014.

But we really should win tonight. If we don't, it isn't because we aren't good enough but because we haven't put in the effort (or perhaps are unlucky with injury or bad umpiring: the former is always a possibility at Etihad and the latter is a probability anywhere, any time).


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
rexy
SS Life Member
Posts: 3373
Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 12:12am
Location: The Gully

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224654Post rexy »

Very big test of charachter for our boys tonight, I expect them to hit in really hard at therstoppages and rotate through furiously to keep fresh legs. Big key for us will be the ability of Roo to really blow up Rance and dominate him late in quarters. Also the ability of Millera Saad and Milne to keep the ball out of the hands of Houli, Newman and Deledio as alot of their attack starts from these guys. Like the side as named and expect to see Cripps or Newnes start as sub rather than Sipposs this week.


Maybe this year?
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224656Post perfectionist »

Discher wrote:First post so here goes . I've watched a couple of Richmond games as I have a couple of there blokes in super coach.
They're not the same rabble we've been beating up for god knows how long. They do have some players of concern.
Our mids will have to be switched right on as they do have some speed through there. There back line is full of nobody's but they are doing a good job. Fwds are crap we are fine there.

They do attack the ball hard same as us & I expect there will be some injurys both ways.
Reckon we'll outlast them in a slug fest but we will have to take far more seriously
Thoughtful and balanced analysis, Discher. You won't last long here.


jays
Club Player
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008 10:58pm
Location: games
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224667Post jays »

should win at least 30+ imo


AlSnoww
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun 27 May 2012 12:35am

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224682Post AlSnoww »

I don't support either team, but if you guys serously think you will win that easily, your crazy. How do you expect to win so easily with no ruckman?? Can't get away with it. They have a ruckman in hot form, a dam good midfield, not the best, but damn good. You guys, if you win, IF, it will only be by a point or 2. If anyone is gonna blow anyone away i think they will make a mess of your guys. Don't tink etihad will be a factor or past history. it means zilch. This will be bloody hard for your boys to win. No saying yu arn't a chance, but the stats say richmond is the better side. Your mob can't keep beetng them forever. they will ge one back sooner or later. Tonight is the night. Tigers by 30+


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224683Post Old Mate »

AlSnoww wrote:I don't support either team, but if you guys serously think you will win that easily, your crazy. How do you expect to win so easily with no ruckman?? Can't get away with it. They have a ruckman in hot form, a dam good midfield, not the best, but damn good. You guys, if you win, IF, it will only be by a point or 2. If anyone is gonna blow anyone away i think they will make a mess of your guys. Don't tink etihad will be a factor or past history. it means zilch. This will be bloody hard for your boys to win. No saying yu arn't a chance, but the stats say richmond is the better side. Your mob can't keep beetng them forever. they will ge one back sooner or later. Tonight is the night. Tigers by 30+
Signing up to an opposition's forum is a bit weird isn't it? It's a St Kilda forum so obviously there will be some bias. And we seemed to cope alright the last few weeks without a recognised ruckman. I could really pick your silly post to pieces however I'll leave it with a couple of minor points. The stats do not point to Richmond being the better side and past history does in fact suggest that Etihad will be a factor. Saints by 20 points. Anyway carry on.










.
Last edited by Old Mate on Fri 01 Jun 2012 4:45pm, edited 3 times in total.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224684Post plugger66 »

AlSnoww wrote:I don't support either team, but if you guys serously think you will win that easily, your crazy. How do you expect to win so easily with no ruckman?? Can't get away with it. They have a ruckman in hot form, a dam good midfield, not the best, but damn good. You guys, if you win, IF, it will only be by a point or 2. If anyone is gonna blow anyone away i think they will make a mess of your guys. Don't tink etihad will be a factor or past history. it means zilch. This will be bloody hard for your boys to win. No saying yu arn't a chance, but the stats say richmond is the better side. Your mob can't keep beetng them forever. they will ge one back sooner or later. Tonight is the night. Tigers by 30+

Strange person.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224708Post meher baba »

AlSnoww wrote:I don't support either team, but if you guys serously think you will win that easily, your crazy. How do you expect to win so easily with no ruckman?? Can't get away with it. They have a ruckman in hot form, a dam good midfield, not the best, but damn good. You guys, if you win, IF, it will only be by a point or 2. If anyone is gonna blow anyone away i think they will make a mess of your guys. Don't tink etihad will be a factor or past history. it means zilch. This will be bloody hard for your boys to win. No saying yu arn't a chance, but the stats say richmond is the better side. Your mob can't keep beetng them forever. they will ge one back sooner or later. Tonight is the night. Tigers by 30+
If the Tigers win by 30+ I'll eat my hat. It won't be easy for us, including because they have a pretty good midfield and a ruckman in good form (although, remember, Hawthorn have a very poor ruck division so his display last week wasn't necessarily the best form guide in history). But, if there's going to be a 30 point blowout, it's more likely to be to us. The Tigers defence is still pretty questionable and their forward line is not that terrific. If they really dominate in the midfield, they'll win, but not by a heap of points IMO.

We'll see. Good luck to the Tigers if they do beat us, because it will show that they have genuinely improved and they are surely due a win against us.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224724Post SMS »

kosifantutti wrote:
SaintPav wrote:This is a 50 50 game
That would have been a distinct possibility under our old coach but the scores will be much higher than that.

HA pissa!


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Tigers? Seriously?

Post: # 1224725Post gringo »

Tigers beat hawks with accurate kicking, or Hawks lost through inaccuracy. We need to keep composed while trying to unsettle them and keep them from getting their tails up.


Post Reply