plugger66 wrote:Tell me you are joking that a game in round 14 showed that the side we would play 10 weeks later was a strong finishing team. Does that make Sydney a strong finishing team so we better prepare for that?
Anyway seen that you have said that what you are saying is not hindsight you sould be able to show us many posts in 09 where you said similar comments and I dont mean after the GF. Can you show us a few?
I;ll give this a go... bearing in mind that my suspicions of RL's poor team selection were only just forming and I didn't reach frustration point until mid 2010... + obviously we were still winning.
Going into Sept... believing that Dempster and Eddy should be dropped
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55579&start=50
A week out from the finals, concerns about Kings form and a preference for McEvoy + belief that Gwilt should play medium forward ahead of Dempster
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55351
Going way back into august... an early call for an out of form Dempster to be dropped
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55220
Expressing Gardiner played well in the 1st week of the finals after a period of poor form
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=56267
A post questioning the way RL used Dempster... though positive saying he would be well suited VS the pies... again acknowledging onging poor form
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55941&start=25
My thoughts on team selection leading into Sept = Out King, Eddy and Dempster
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55659
Another post leading into Sept questioning Dempster's spot in the side... querying his selection ahead of Geary, Ball, Max and Armitage
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=55655
On a little side not, pre g/f 09 saying that Kosi, Schnieder and Milne are the players that will make or break... dammit I'm good... wish I was wrong on that 1
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=56785
And here it is again in hindsight
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=58132
I think I make a pretty convincing case... called it b4 the game... with the benefit of hindsight, stood by it