2 to 3 games in NZ
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
It will take time. I expect IF we do take this deal the first few years won't have the biggest impact in NZ and I expect the people complaining here will be running out the I told you so lines.
If St Kilda are to do this they need to commit to it long term. As in a minimum of 5 years- closer to 10.
You reap what you sow but it seems many here don't want to even plant seeds.
So many jokes can be made of this post I know.
Also even if numbers in NZ/at the ground are crap can you imagine the TV coverage for an ANZAC night game, especially if we play a big club- almost worth it for that alone.
*Friday night football wasn't an instant success.
*Anzac clash wasn't always this big
*Hawks didn't arrive in Tassie with all the work already done
If St Kilda are to do this they need to commit to it long term. As in a minimum of 5 years- closer to 10.
You reap what you sow but it seems many here don't want to even plant seeds.
So many jokes can be made of this post I know.
Also even if numbers in NZ/at the ground are crap can you imagine the TV coverage for an ANZAC night game, especially if we play a big club- almost worth it for that alone.
*Friday night football wasn't an instant success.
*Anzac clash wasn't always this big
*Hawks didn't arrive in Tassie with all the work already done
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
The credibility of someone who posts their real name and has an actual photo of themselves as an avartar on a footy blog is very questionable.james rose wrote:It will take time. I expect IF we do take this deal the first few years won't have the biggest impact in NZ and I expect the people complaining here will be running out the I told you so lines.
If St Kilda are to do this they need to commit to it long term. As in a minimum of 5 years- closer to 10.
You reap what you sow but it seems many here don't want to even plant seeds.
So many jokes can be made of this post I know.
Also even if numbers in NZ/at the ground are crap can you imagine the TV coverage for an ANZAC night game, especially if we play a big club- almost worth it for that alone.
*Friday night football wasn't an instant success.
*Anzac clash wasn't always this big
*Hawks didn't arrive in Tassie with all the work already done
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
right and u can read the future and have declared it to be a success?andrewg wrote:The tv rights wouldn't stop this from happening???magnifisaint wrote:This thread is full of s*** as everyone is putting their own interests before the club. I believe within the next 10 years the Bulldogs and North won't exist in Melbourne. Think about it!
anything else you can lets us in on. lotto numbers?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- stevie
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2010 9:09am
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 144 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
Didn't realise you knew Darren Jarman, Con.Con Gorozidis wrote:My final word on the matter comes not from me. But from a wise friend.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: Mon 05 Apr 2004 1:49pm
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
A strange post.SaintPav wrote:The credibility of someone who posts their real name and has an actual photo of themselves as an avartar on a footy blog is very questionable.james rose wrote:It will take time. I expect IF we do take this deal the first few years won't have the biggest impact in NZ and I expect the people complaining here will be running out the I told you so lines.
If St Kilda are to do this they need to commit to it long term. As in a minimum of 5 years- closer to 10.
You reap what you sow but it seems many here don't want to even plant seeds.
So many jokes can be made of this post I know.
Also even if numbers in NZ/at the ground are crap can you imagine the TV coverage for an ANZAC night game, especially if we play a big club- almost worth it for that alone.
*Friday night football wasn't an instant success.
*Anzac clash wasn't always this big
*Hawks didn't arrive in Tassie with all the work already done
Not only do I not understand your logic but also your intent.
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
The Craw wrote:Watching the A-league is like watching the 1st division of the EDFL.plugger66 wrote: Firstly it is good 20k play Auskick but it means bugger all really. Soccer is the most participated sport in Australia but apart Victory no one watches it.
What you have is the worlds best, playing an Aust Rules football game in a geographic location similar to Melbourne in a sports mad city.
Great Idea I say.
And NZ would care if its the worlds best. Of course it is. No one else plays it.
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5862
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 112 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
'Fraid St P has a point there James... I'm proof of that...SaintPav wrote:The credibility of someone who posts their real name and has an actual photo of themselves as an avartar on a footy blog is very questionable.james rose wrote:It will take time. I expect IF we do take this deal the first few years won't have the biggest impact in NZ and I expect the people complaining here will be running out the I told you so lines.
If St Kilda are to do this they need to commit to it long term. As in a minimum of 5 years- closer to 10.
You reap what you sow but it seems many here don't want to even plant seeds.
So many jokes can be made of this post I know.
Also even if numbers in NZ/at the ground are crap can you imagine the TV coverage for an ANZAC night game, especially if we play a big club- almost worth it for that alone.
*Friday night football wasn't an instant success.
*Anzac clash wasn't always this big
*Hawks didn't arrive in Tassie with all the work already done
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
The talk was that it would start at around 1pm NZ time and finish before the Melbourne game. NZ time being 2hrs ahead.SideshowMilne wrote:Any talk of the Anzac Day game time. Any bets Eddie is behind the scenes ensuring it runs at night as therefore same time (and TV slot) as 'his' game.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Re: 2 to 3 games in NZ
I think we should sell three of our interstate away games to NZ. We could give 11% of the fee to the away team. A win win win scenario.