"The worst decision in 30 years..."

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9054
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 353 times

"The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1216998Post perfectionist »

As part of a broader criticism of the AFL for prematurely changing rules to suit the flavour of the week, Tim Lane in The Sunday Age writes:

"The week just gone also contained a haunting reminder of the AFL's preparedness to do as it pleases in its handling of the game's laws. A time-keeping error last Saturday was within a whisker of affecting the result of the game between Gold Coast and Fremantle. Had it done so, the AFL commission could have been expected to act as it did in 2006 when it overturned an outcome achieved on the field in a match between St Kilda and Fremantle because the full-time siren had not been heard on the field. I believe that 2006 decision was the worst, and most dangerous, I've observed in more than 30 years covering this sporting competition."

I agree. By ignoring the actual rules and changing the result of the game because some media people thought that it should, a new concept of "process" was introduced.

And on the issue of "sliding", I also agree with Tim Lane. One person's dangerous slide is another person's desperate attempt to be first for the ball, and there are a lot more of the latter than the former. I umpired over three hundred games. In all of them, I would call, when the ball was in contest, for the players to "go for the ball". The best games to umpire were those when that happened and I would have little to do. Being first for the ball is the number one requirement of our game, or it should be anyway.


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217006Post Enrico_Misso »

I still think we should have taken it to court.

We would have clearly won the case as the AFL clearly overturned their own rule which stated that the game is only over when the umpire acknowledges hearing the siren, not when it actually went, or should have gone.

Was a disgrace and remains a disgrace.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217014Post gringo »

Enrico_Misso wrote:I still think we should have taken it to court.

We would have clearly won the case as the AFL clearly overturned their own rule which stated that the game is only over when the umpire acknowledges hearing the siren, not when it actually went, or should have gone.

Was a disgrace and remains a disgrace.

I'm not sure as they are the administrator and owner they are conflicted but a law unto themselves. It depends on their own rulebook as to whether or not they can make rulings that can be implemented after the fact.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217017Post gringo »

The worst was when they allowed corrupt umpires to get away with vindictive umpiring and not being sanctioned in any way. Condoning inexcusable behaviour is to me unbelievable. No process and a complete eye shutting exercise by a crap administration. Whispers in the sky was for me the worst.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217018Post plugger66 »

At least people have let it go.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217036Post saintspremiers »

plugger66 wrote:At least people have let it go.
Why should we ever let it go plugger?

When GT was coach, we were subject to corrupt umpiring and tinkering of the draw by the AFL because Thomas spoke his mind and spoke out against the fat bastard.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217041Post Life Long Saint »

saintspremiers wrote:
plugger66 wrote:At least people have let it go.
Why should we ever let it go plugger?

When GT was coach, we were subject to corrupt umpiring and tinkering of the draw by the AFL because Thomas spoke his mind and spoke out against the fat bastard.
Agreed...That decision, in the end, handed Fremantle a top 4 spot at our expense. We would have finished 3rd on percentage above Freo and faced Adelaide in the first final. It also would have seen Sydney finish out of the top 4 and, most likely, miss the GF spot.

This was not like an umpiring mistake which happen multiple times a game. This was the administration overturning their own rule to unfairly benefit one team over another. There was clearly an agenda at play.

The fact that we rolled over and accepted it was deplorable and it followed on from the whispers in the sky fiasco the year before. The animosity between the AFL CEO and our coach almost certainly led to this farce. We should have fought and fought and taken it to the courts to claim our two points and top 4 spot!

I will never, ever let this go.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217052Post plugger66 »

saintspremiers wrote:
plugger66 wrote:At least people have let it go.
Why should we ever let it go plugger?

When GT was coach, we were subject to corrupt umpiring and tinkering of the draw by the AFL because Thomas spoke his mind and spoke out against the fat bastard.

Of course we were. people still think we are now.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217074Post bergholt »

Life Long Saint wrote:This was not like an umpiring mistake which happen multiple times a game. This was the administration overturning their own rule to unfairly benefit one team over another. There was clearly an agenda at play.
"clearly an agenda"? bulls***.

look at it from a neutral perspective. the letter of the law led to an unjust outcome.

when the siren went freo were ahead - this generally makes them the winners. because the umpire didn't hear the siren and there was a strange rule on the books about the umpire hearing the siren, they got shafted. the afl fixed this anomaly after the game.

we were behind when the siren went. why do we deserve two points in that situation?


Leo.J
SS Life Member
Posts: 3127
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217087Post Leo.J »

It cost us a double chance.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217093Post bergholt »

Leo.J wrote:It cost us a double chance.
yeah, losing the game cost us a double chance. if we'd beaten them fair and square then we might have won the flag that year. but we didn't beat them.


User avatar
Team Tommy
Club Player
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009 2:21pm
Location: Earth

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217095Post Team Tommy »

I don't believe that our game is in safe hands with the current administration. Too many knee jerk reactions for my liking.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1534 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217098Post kosifantutti »

bergholt wrote:
Life Long Saint wrote:This was not like an umpiring mistake which happen multiple times a game. This was the administration overturning their own rule to unfairly benefit one team over another. There was clearly an agenda at play.
"clearly an agenda"? bulls***.

look at it from a neutral perspective. the letter of the law led to an unjust outcome.

when the siren went freo were ahead - this generally makes them the winners. because the umpire didn't hear the siren and there was a strange rule on the books about the umpire hearing the siren, they got shafted. the afl fixed this anomaly after the game.

we were behind when the siren went. why do we deserve two points in that situation?
Scores were level when the umpires declared the game over. Why do Freo deserve four points?

It was a bad rule but it was the rule. The AFL set a dangerous precedent by changing the result of a game.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Leo.J
SS Life Member
Posts: 3127
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 72 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217104Post Leo.J »

bergholt wrote:
Leo.J wrote:It cost us a double chance.
yeah, losing the game cost us a double chance. if we'd beaten them fair and square then we might have won the flag that year. but we didn't beat them.
That was the problem according to the rules of the game it was a draw...

Well the rules before that game anyway.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217135Post bergholt »

kosifantutti wrote:Scores were level when the umpires declared the game over. Why do Freo deserve four points?
they were ahead when the siren went. any six year old would tell you that they deserve the win.
kosifantutti wrote:It was a bad rule but it was the rule. The AFL set a dangerous precedent by changing the result of a game.
i don't completely disagree with that, but i think they ended up with the correct result and hopefully fixed the rule. (i don't know what actually happened formally.)


whiskers3614
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4567
Joined: Thu 20 May 2010 11:49pm
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217137Post whiskers3614 »

When I saw thread heading I thought it was about Ball/Lovett fiasco!


Riewoldt and Goddard to live up to their reputations ,Clarke and Ray to defy theirs in 2012!
User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217141Post Life Long Saint »

bergholt wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:Scores were level when the umpires declared the game over. Why do Freo deserve four points?
they were ahead when the siren went. any six year old would tell you that they deserve the win.
kosifantutti wrote:It was a bad rule but it was the rule. The AFL set a dangerous precedent by changing the result of a game.
i don't completely disagree with that, but i think they ended up with the correct result and hopefully fixed the rule. (i don't know what actually happened formally.)
Scores can be counted after the siren has sounded...any six year old will tell you that too!

Also, try playing a game with a 6yo and change the rules half way through the game so they are disadvantaged...and see how that goes down!

They haven't fixed the rule, BTW...The game is only over when the umpire acknowledges the siren...What they have done, though is put an earpiece into the umpires ear so that they hear the siren...As with any technology, it is not fail-proof. The technology could fail and the umpires fail to hear the siren.

I don't know whether you're too young to remember the 1980 pre-season Grand Final when North Melbourne scored a goal at least 30 seconds after the siren went. The TV coverage didn't pick it up but the crowd and some of the players did...The goal that North scored won them the game. The VFL didn't intervene then as the rule is set. And that is what should have happened in 2006.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217146Post Bernard Shakey »

Life Long Saint wrote:
I don't know whether you're too young to remember the 1980 pre-season Grand Final when North Melbourne scored a goal at least 30 seconds after the siren went. The TV coverage didn't pick it up but the crowd and some of the players did...The goal that North scored won them the game. The VFL didn't intervene then as the rule is set. And that is what should have happened in 2006.
That was fair, Collingwood lost.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217154Post bergholt »

Life Long Saint wrote:Also, try playing a game with a 6yo and change the rules half way through the game so they are disadvantaged...and see how that goes down!
that's only an argument if anyone knows the rule exists! i'm too young to remember 1980, so i had no idea the rule was "when the umpire hears the siren". 99% of the patrons and all of the st kilda and freo players were in the same boat, i reckon. most people would have just expected that the game ends when the siren goes and whoever's ahead at that point wins.

it's not like the saints were relying on that rule. if it had been allowed then we would have got lucky, and it would have been patently unfair to freo. the fact that the rule is kinda wrong doesn't make it any less unfair to them.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: "The worst decision in 30 years..."

Post: # 1217159Post dragit »

Maybe they could have changed the anti-doping laws retrospectively too…

Paul Chapmans oxygen spun blood is seen as cheating, maybe they could revoke his Norm Smith and more importantly the Premiership?

Sure he didn't break the rules at the time, but really they won the match using a treatment banned by WADA and the AFL a week later… surely hindsight would judge that incident, plus the poster as an unfair advantage and award us the rightful best team on the day/year?

I certainly will never get over that.


Post Reply