Wilkes

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1804
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 312 times

Wilkes

Post: # 1212033Post saintkid »

Can't believe Watters subbed Wilkes off. The guy had a very good 3rd quarter. Should have subbed Blake off. He's been struggling all year.


clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212035Post clarky449 »

Wouldnt Sub Blake off, Cripps.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212054Post Playon »

Yeah like for like, Wilkes great debut


fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212062Post fugazi »

Wilkes BOG and subbed off!!!!


Nee!
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212071Post Con Gorozidis »

has a 'tweak" according to the coach at 3/4 time... mmmm.
poor bugger if he gets sent back to vfl next week.


Ralphy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4080
Joined: Wed 20 Feb 2008 8:26pm
Location: Morwell Gippsland Australia
Contact:

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212089Post Ralphy »

Wont be blake has done his knee, poor bloke, probably if its ACL career over.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7934
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 548 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212118Post bobmurray »

Ralphy wrote:Wont be blake has done his knee, poor bloke, probably if its ACL career over.
He came back on.....after they removed his leg....


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7934
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 548 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212121Post bobmurray »

Con Gorozidis wrote:has a 'tweak" according to the coach at 3/4 time... mmmm.
poor bugger if he gets sent back to vfl next week.
Tweak my ar**.....he broke team rules and kicked too many goals....

plenty of spectators in the team tonight who should have been subbed before wilkes...

Anyway...how good was Polo when he came on...sub of the year... :roll:


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
User avatar
stkildathunda
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
Contact:

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212163Post stkildathunda »

Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!


User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212167Post Iceman234 »

bobmurray wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:has a 'tweak" according to the coach at 3/4 time... mmmm.
poor bugger if he gets sent back to vfl next week.
Tweak my ar**.....he broke team rules and kicked too many goals....

plenty of spectators in the team tonight who should have been subbed before wilkes...

Anyway...how good was Polo when he came on...sub of the year... :roll:

9 possessions after he came on?

Not too shabby.

Wish I'd got 9 possies in a game at the top level, especially when coming on so late... :roll:


Image
saber
Club Player
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 11:49pm

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212170Post saber »

bobmurray wrote:
Ralphy wrote:Wont be blake has done his knee, poor bloke, probably if its ACL career over.
He came back on.....after they removed his leg....
That must have been the quickest amputation, and rehab learning how to use a prosthetic leg I've ever seen :o

Look, I wasn't happy with the decision, but Polo didn't play bad when he came on.
Would have liked to have seen say Cripps come off, and play Wilkes and Milne alone in the forward line.
Wilkes providing a focal point, and contest when the ball hits the deck, with Milne mopping up the crumbs and feeding off Wilkes.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212176Post SainterK »

stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Rubbish.

Was the perfect move in the context of the match.

Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.

Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.

It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?


jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212185Post jonesy »

SainterK wrote:
stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Rubbish.

Was the perfect move in the context of the match.

Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.

Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.

It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?

Is it april fools? Game sealer?

Of course Polo needed to be subbed on in those conditions, but for the man who right then and there was having an absolute profound impact on the game,and smack bang in the middle of a purple patch!? Please! It was a disgraceful decision and Wilkes is owed an apology


Bring back the Lockett era
clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212188Post clarky449 »

jonesy wrote:
SainterK wrote:
stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Rubbish.

Was the perfect move in the context of the match.

Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.

Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.

It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?

Is it april fools? Game sealer?

Of course Polo needed to be subbed on in those conditions, but for the man who right then and there was having an absolute profound impact on the game,and smack bang in the middle of a purple patch!? Please! It was a disgraceful decision and Wilkes is owed an apology
Although i believe Wilkes should of stayed on. I dotnt hink he is owed an apology.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
User avatar
stkildathunda
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2176
Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
Contact:

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212189Post stkildathunda »

Coming off Twitter.

Scott watters said decision to sub Wilkes was made prior to mark and goal. They tried to reverse it but was too late as paperwork lodged With interchange stewards and hence couldn't change it.


slider
Club Player
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed 15 Feb 2012 8:43pm

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212193Post slider »

SainterK wrote:
stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Rubbish.

Was the perfect move in the context of the match.

Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.

Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.

It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?
What ever your taking i dont want any
clueless post at best


clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212195Post clarky449 »

stkildathunda wrote:Coming off Twitter.

Scott watters said decision to sub Wilkes was made prior to mark and goal. They tried to reverse it but was too late as paperwork lodged With interchange stewards and hence couldn't change it.
Well that explains it. We can all go back to thinking Scott is the new Messiah!


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
jonesy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4655
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
Location: Melb
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212199Post jonesy »

stkildathunda wrote:Coming off Twitter.

Scott watters said decision to sub Wilkes was made prior to mark and goal. They tried to reverse it but was too late as paperwork lodged With interchange stewards and hence couldn't change it.
So he lied at 3/4 time about the hammy tweak,or did he lie about the paper lodgement? Someone worked under the 'Liar' for to long I think....


Bring back the Lockett era
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212203Post SainterK »

I give up.

I don't reckon hardly any of you watched that last quarter, and once the emotion that BT and Richo heightened in a lot of you eases off a little....you have to watch it again, and watch the last quarter fold out about as good as it could of.

Nobody will change my mind that there was a determination in the box to enter that last quarter with most of the effort in locking down the footy and preventing them scoring.

And they didn't!!!!

I'm glad they went with taking off a tall.

I'm going to talk about other parts of the game.


clarky449
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sat 05 Apr 2008 12:29am
Location: Melbourne

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212212Post clarky449 »

Obviously Scott Watters agrees with many of us that we didnt want Wilkes off int he 3rd.


Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212223Post Teflon »

SainterK wrote:I give up.

I don't reckon hardly any of you watched that last quarter, and once the emotion that BT and Richo heightened in a lot of you eases off a little....you have to watch it again, and watch the last quarter fold out about as good as it could of.

Nobody will change my mind that there was a determination in the box to enter that last quarter with most of the effort in locking down the footy and preventing them scoring.

And they didn't!!!!

I'm glad they went with taking off a tall.

I'm going to talk about other parts of the game.
yes perhaps best if you focus on the "other"parts of the game that dont perhaps call into question our club cause clearly in your mind ALL their decisions are the right ones.......


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212225Post Teflon »

stkildathunda wrote:Coming off Twitter.

Scott watters said decision to sub Wilkes was made prior to mark and goal. They tried to reverse it but was too late as paperwork lodged With interchange stewards and hence couldn't change it.

something smells wrong here........


“Yeah….nah””
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212227Post SainterK »

Teflon wrote:
SainterK wrote:I give up.

I don't reckon hardly any of you watched that last quarter, and once the emotion that BT and Richo heightened in a lot of you eases off a little....you have to watch it again, and watch the last quarter fold out about as good as it could of.

Nobody will change my mind that there was a determination in the box to enter that last quarter with most of the effort in locking down the footy and preventing them scoring.

And they didn't!!!!

I'm glad they went with taking off a tall.

I'm going to talk about other parts of the game.
yes perhaps best if you focus on the "other"parts of the game that dont perhaps call into question our club cause clearly in your mind ALL their decisions are the right ones.......
I reckon we were far too tall tonight.

There is a wrong decision for you.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19157
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212232Post SaintPav »

SainterK wrote:
stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Rubbish.

Was the perfect move in the context of the match.

Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.

Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.

It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?
Some truth in this..


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
dcstkfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4584
Joined: Mon 12 Jun 2006 9:37pm
Location: St Kilda

Re: Wilkes

Post: # 1212264Post dcstkfc »

The truth lies somewhere between the two extreme. Wilkes only had 4 touches all game, but did look dangerous and snagged three. Perhaps he wasn't going to be able to run it out, perhaps it was just an error. Ultimately it all worked out OK, because we won by three goals (Wilkes' tally) and kept Melbourne scoreless in the final term


STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.

‎''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
Post Reply