plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:I'm just curious. Does anyone know what changes were made to Geelongs game plan last year that differed from Thomsons game plan?
Firstly they went from the least interchanged to the most. They also didnt go through the middle of the ground anywhere near as much. They had more kicks than handballs compared to previous years and they also were much more defensive.
Cairnsman: same here, I think they are mostly preceived: The talk was that in Thompsons last year, the players were in conflict with the coach regarding "
changes to the game plan". Scott said there would not be changes. GO figure.
interchange numbers had more to do with rule changes to the bench numbers.
corridor ? that is pure perception ALL TEAMS TRY to controll the corridor in defense, which usually means attack is mostly via the wings unless you get a midfield turn over. i can guarantee you one thing in 2012, "someone" will be the first to call WE use the boundary more often, just like collingwood. (the Watters - ex-collingwood game plan)
more kicks? universally regarded as the best way to break the offensive press of numbers (get the ball over the wall)
more defensive? 2008 = 1846 (points against) 2009 = 1815 (p.a) 2010 = 1702 (p.a) 2011 = 1619 (p.a)
I would call that a trend.