Cousins

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
iremember66
Club Player
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 6:20pm
Location: ballarat

Post: # 1187481Post iremember66 »

If Demetriou is fair-dinkum, he should launch a full-blown investigation into that 2005 WCE premiership winning team and no doubt through witnesses, maybe player testimonies etc. enough evidence of the taking of banned substances for AFL players could be gathered and then he should punish them accordingly.[/quote]

Wasn't that the year our Dal missed the brownlow by a vote or so????


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Post: # 1187482Post Enrico_Misso »

iremember66 wrote:If Demetriou is fair-dinkum, he should launch a full-blown investigation into that 2005 WCE premiership winning team and no doubt through witnesses, maybe player testimonies etc. enough evidence of the taking of banned substances for AFL players could be gathered and then he should punish them accordingly.
Wasn't that the year our Dal missed the brownlow by a vote or so????[/quote]
Should also investigate the tainted 92 Premiership team.
In 1991 WCE were a bunch of skinny kids.
In 1992 they had muscles on muscles.
Everyone knows the story but the AFL have always turned a blind eye.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Post: # 1187490Post bergholt »

Spinner wrote:And drugs are prevalent more than people think. I would say Dale Lewis was a lot closer to the mark with his statement a while ago than most people think.
yup, in the afl and in society generally for twenty-somethings.

it's unlikely to change any time soon so it's probably worth trying to get used to it.


jays
Club Player
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008 10:58pm
Location: games
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Post: # 1187495Post jays »

this is very true


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187607Post st_Trav_ofWA »

Enrico_Misso wrote: Should also investigate the tainted 92 Premiership team.
In 1991 WCE were a bunch of skinny kids.
In 1992 they had muscles on muscles.
Everyone knows the story but the AFL have always turned a blind eye.
what a load of CRAP !! We see this happen every year skinny kid from the previous year bulk up over the off season .. I hate the WCE as much as the next person but please get your facts correct !! The reason the eagles players came back stronger and bigger was due to all the players becoming full time athletes the players at the eagles were the first to have dedicated nutritionist they trained every day and were doing doble the body conditioning work than the rest of the AFL ... Not drug cheating just more professional practices and better developed sports science .. The eagles were on strict training practices during this time while clubs like St Kilda were stuck in the "pie" night era ...


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5862
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Post: # 1187694Post Dave McNamara »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
Enrico_Misso wrote: Should also investigate the tainted 92 Premiership team.
In 1991 WCE were a bunch of skinny kids.
In 1992 they had muscles on muscles.
Everyone knows the story but the AFL have always turned a blind eye.
what a load of CRAP !! We see this happen every year skinny kid from the previous year bulk up over the off season .. I hate the WCE as much as the next person but please get your facts correct !! The reason the eagles players came back stronger and bigger was due to all the players becoming full time athletes the players at the eagles were the first to have dedicated nutritionist they trained every day and were doing doble the body conditioning work than the rest of the AFL ... Not drug cheating just more professional practices and better developed sports science .. The eagles were on strict training practices during this time while clubs like St Kilda were stuck in the "pie" night era ...
Hi St Trav, I'm happy to accept what you say above as you're over there and in the know. On that basis, do you have any inside word on their most recent premership side? For me, that's the really suss one.


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 1187705Post matrix »

gear on they were


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5939
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: Outside Lucky Burgers
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Post: # 1187706Post samuraisaint »

Have to agree with Dave Mc on that one. Family live in Perth and remember hearing about how the Weagles were doing all these weights three times a week in the preseason and their players said that after each training session they were so wrecked that they couldn't even drive.
They ramped up what Kennedy's Commandos did in the early 60s to gain the physical edge.
Just out of interest, when did the 'Pleasant Sunday Mornings' and steak, eggs and chips after training Thursday nights finish (90s?)- remember Burkey and Loewe talking about that stuff in newspaper articles.
And at the same time, Lockett, Burns and Frawley referring to their trip home to Ballarat after training as being a "six pack trip" - and sometimes more than that!


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187825Post st_Trav_ofWA »

West coasts last flag came with the controversy of the drug taking again I don't think it had anything to do with their teams performance in fact if anything it would have disadvantaged the group due to the effects of the drugs reported .. I know a few people who had seen some of the player under the influence at various night spots in Perth and honestly they struggled to stay on their feet so the claims it helped their on field ability seems very very far fetched to me ..


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12798
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 811 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Post: # 1187830Post Mr Magic »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:West coasts last flag came with the controversy of the drug taking again I don't think it had anything to do with their teams performance in fact if anything it would have disadvantaged the group due to the effects of the drugs reported .. I know a few people who had seen some of the player under the influence at various night spots in Perth and honestly they struggled to stay on their feet so the claims it helped their on field ability seems very very far fetched to me ..
I'm not sure about all that Trav.
I still have vivid memories of Cousins in a game at the Dome against us performing like a 'superman' after half-time.
So much so that many around me (including myself) were heard to utter comments as to 'what did he take at half-time?

I've been priveliged to watch the whole of the greatest 'running machine' to ever play the game's carrer and his running/endurance feats paled into insignificance compared to Cousins that day.

I don't care how many people tell me he was 'clean' whilst playing, I believe what my eyes saw and I have absolutely no doubt he 'took' something at half time.
What it was I have no idea.

And before there is a response about how 'clean' tha game is because of the few 'positive' tests that have been reported, I merely point out that Cousins, so drug addicted that he's required numerous stays in rehab over the past few years, never tested 'positive' to the AFL drug tests.

That pretty much says it all to me.

Even when he fronted up completely shaven for a 'hair drug test' before being allowed to play again was surely enough for anybody to work out that the AFL's recreational drug testing regime is designed to catch pure morons or fools only.
They should scrap it as it's a complete waste of time, effort and money.

I happened to be at a party on New Years Eve with a committee member from another club who stated categorically that there is a high profile player who has tested positive at least 3 times and that most within AFL circles know about it.

But he's still playing.
Seems you have to be a rookie or an ordinary player to feel the 'wrath' of the AFL in this area.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1187834Post SainterK »

Mr Magic wrote:I happened to be at a party on New Years Eve with a committee member from another club who stated categorically that there is a high profile player who has tested positive at least 3 times and that most within AFL circles know about it.

But he's still playing.
Seems you have to be a rookie or an ordinary player to feel the 'wrath' of the AFL in this area.
They wouldn't dare, surely?


User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5862
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Post: # 1187836Post Dave McNamara »

Mr Magic wrote:
I happened to be at a party on New Years Eve with a committee member from another club who stated categorically that there is a high profile player who has tested positive at least 3 times and that most within AFL circles know about it.

But he's still playing.
Seems you have to be a rookie or an ordinary player to feel the 'wrath' of the AFL in this area.
Hi Mr Magic ol' Buddy, thanks for the inside word.


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4344
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1467 times

Post: # 1187844Post cwrcyn »

Mr Magic, I saw that game too, and pointed Cousins out to people around me early in the last quarter that Judd could barely break from stoppages, Harvey was stuffed, and everyone else was battling to get through the game and yet Cousins was running twice as fast as every player on the ground except Kerr, who was marginally below Cousins' energy levels. It was unbelievable - like watching the Pakistani cricket team in Sydney a couple of years ago. - something wasn't quite right with this picture.

I was convinced at that moment that he was on something, as was Kerr, and as you know, it was some months before the Sh%%* hit the fan.

As to the 1992 Eagles team, well, just about everyone has a similar opinion on that. You can't increase your body mass and your endurance by 50% in a single pre-season. The normal equation is endurance up, body mass down.

There's also the curious and spectacular endurance of the bombers in 2000. I watched a few of their games that year and clearly their endurance was at least 30% better than the next best team. Other teams were gasping for breath while Essendon players looked completely fresh at all times. Once again, it cannot naturally be achieved over a single pre-season by an entire playing group. My guess was EPO, which I believe was not being tested at the time.




.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187846Post st_Trav_ofWA »

By that logic people should be curious of our 2004 run or 2009 after we fell into 4th spot in 2008.... As for Cousins playin like a super human after half time that is nothing un common the bloke was the fittest player in the comp he was such a good player because like Harvey in the 90's he could keep on coming when others were getting tired lots of players come out of half time with their second wind I very very highly doubt any player has taken a recreational drug at half time of an afl game


The reason Cousins never got caught was because he took his drugs at nightclubs and parties not on game day and the drugs he took were flushed out of his system by the time he was getting tested .. As for Kerr he was more into the types of drugs to put you asleep (horse tranq Valium ) hardly going to help him win the footy ...

If you have ever seen some one under the influence of drugs you will quickly see that decision making skills , accuracy ,calmness, skill and motivation are not strong attributes of the person on the drugs so to think it would help a player become better is misguided


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187847Post st_Trav_ofWA »

Who in the eagles 92 team increased their body mass by 50%???? the team went through the preseason from hell in 92 ask scotty Watters how hard 92 was compared with 91 ... The team saw how close they were in 91 to getting the flag and put in the extra yards .. 92 also saw many of the eagles players hit their peak age bracket where they finally grow into their body ..... This year Sippos looks like he has added lots of mass to his frame are we going to accuse him of being on the juice ???


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1187848Post plugger66 »

Mr Magic wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:West coasts last flag came with the controversy of the drug taking again I don't think it had anything to do with their teams performance in fact if anything it would have disadvantaged the group due to the effects of the drugs reported .. I know a few people who had seen some of the player under the influence at various night spots in Perth and honestly they struggled to stay on their feet so the claims it helped their on field ability seems very very far fetched to me ..
I'm not sure about all that Trav.
I still have vivid memories of Cousins in a game at the Dome against us performing like a 'superman' after half-time.
So much so that many around me (including myself) were heard to utter comments as to 'what did he take at half-time?

I've been priveliged to watch the whole of the greatest 'running machine' to ever play the game's carrer and his running/endurance feats paled into insignificance compared to Cousins that day.

I don't care how many people tell me he was 'clean' whilst playing, I believe what my eyes saw and I have absolutely no doubt he 'took' something at half time.
What it was I have no idea.

And before there is a response about how 'clean' tha game is because of the few 'positive' tests that have been reported, I merely point out that Cousins, so drug addicted that he's required numerous stays in rehab over the past few years, never tested 'positive' to the AFL drug tests.

That pretty much says it all to me.

Even when he fronted up completely shaven for a 'hair drug test' before being allowed to play again was surely enough for anybody to work out that the AFL's recreational drug testing regime is designed to catch pure morons or fools only.
They should scrap it as it's a complete waste of time, effort and money.

I happened to be at a party on New Years Eve with a committee member from another club who stated categorically that there is a high profile player who has tested positive at least 3 times and that most within AFL circles know about it.

But he's still playing.
Seems you have to be a rookie or an ordinary player to feel the 'wrath' of the AFL in this area.

The testing certainly isnt a waste of time. Even if they only catch morons it is better than nothing. Also cant have anyone having 3 strikes and still playing. Surely you have seen the leaking in the AFL over the years. If someone was on 3 strikes the papers would know as would half the general public.


User avatar
St Loxton
Club Player
Posts: 1232
Joined: Mon 02 Feb 2009 9:50pm
Location: Jindivick
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Post: # 1187849Post St Loxton »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote: If you have ever seen some one under the influence of drugs you will quickly see that decision making skills , accuracy ,calmness, skill and motivation are not strong attributes of the person on the drugs so to think it would help a player become better is misguided
Different drugs have different effects.

Speed, cocaine, meth, ice, etc very very different than tranquilizers.


User avatar
kosifantutti23
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2388
Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
Location: Horgen

Post: # 1187864Post kosifantutti23 »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Who in the eagles 92 team increased their body mass by 50%???? the team went through the preseason from hell in 92 ask scotty Watters how hard 92 was compared with 91 ... The team saw how close they were in 91 to getting the flag and put in the extra yards .. 92 also saw many of the eagles players hit their peak age bracket where they finally grow into their body ..... This year Sippos looks like he has added lots of mass to his frame are we going to accuse him of being on the juice ???
every premiership team since '67 has been on the juice.


Furtius Quo Rdelious
User avatar
8856brother
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4374
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 2:58pm
Location: Twin Peaks
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 1187865Post 8856brother »

We must have been on some good gear for most of 2009 going by some posters knowledge of drug taking :shock:


_______________________________________________________________________
"Don't argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 1187867Post Spinner »

St Loxton wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote: If you have ever seen some one under the influence of drugs you will quickly see that decision making skills , accuracy ,calmness, skill and motivation are not strong attributes of the person on the drugs so to think it would help a player become better is misguided
Different drugs have different effects.

Speed, cocaine, meth, ice, etc very very different than tranquilizers.

All people go out to unwind from work.

Most people enjoy alcohol. Beer is a popular choice.

Beer puts on weight. While instead of putting on weight to 'unwind' Cousins is on hard drugs. Doesn't eat and get supremely lean once he is finished his bender.


Is this substitute considered performance enhancing? I believe so.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187870Post st_Trav_ofWA »

St Loxton wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote: If you have ever seen some one under the influence of drugs you will quickly see that decision making skills , accuracy ,calmness, skill and motivation are not strong attributes of the person on the drugs so to think it would help a player become better is misguided
Different drugs have different effects.

Speed, cocaine, meth, ice, etc very very different than tranquilizers.
Name me one person on speed , coke meth or Ice who could hit a target by foot who could make clever decisions under pressure that could keep their mind clear to be effective on a footy field ... There is a reason the cops now test for drugged drivers .. Yes some drugs give energy to the users but it is wasted energy because the brain function to use that energy to advantage is compromised ... See a person on ice and ask them to run in a straight line and then you will see it is very very unlikey to be on the drug while playing top class footy


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
hungry for a premiership
Club Player
Posts: 856
Joined: Fri 08 Oct 2010 2:01am

Post: # 1187871Post hungry for a premiership »

All drugs can be generally classed into two catogories: Stimulants and depressants.

Stimulants, like ice and speed, "stimulate" the central nervous system and increase the amount of information that can be passed from the CNS to the brain per second, as well as increasing energy levels and giving more endurance and resistance to fatigue. In the short term, anyway. Long term they just cause brain damage.

Depressants, eg. alcohol, weed, heroin, slow down the amount of information passed.

Someone who is high on a stimulant and playing a sport has a definite advantage over someone who is not.
Last edited by hungry for a premiership on Tue 17 Jan 2012 8:57pm, edited 1 time in total.


"Too big, too strong, too whatever."
User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187872Post st_Trav_ofWA »

kosifantutti23 wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Who in the eagles 92 team increased their body mass by 50%???? the team went through the preseason from hell in 92 ask scotty Watters how hard 92 was compared with 91 ... The team saw how close they were in 91 to getting the flag and put in the extra yards .. 92 also saw many of the eagles players hit their peak age bracket where they finally grow into their body ..... This year Sippos looks like he has added lots of mass to his frame are we going to accuse him of being on the juice ???
every premiership team since '67 has been on the juice.
Obviously .... Really I can understand the stereotype that other clubs supporters have of our supporters we can't accept other teams have been better than us we have to hang on to "well they cheated" or " the umps have it in for us " :roll:


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Post: # 1187873Post Old Mate »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:Who in the eagles 92 team increased their body mass by 50%???? the team went through the preseason from hell in 92 ask scotty Watters how hard 92 was compared with 91 ... The team saw how close they were in 91 to getting the flag and put in the extra yards .. 92 also saw many of the eagles players hit their peak age bracket where they finally grow into their body ..... This year Sippos looks like he has added lots of mass to his frame are we going to accuse him of being on the juice ???
every premiership team since '67 has been on the juice.
Obviously .... Really I can understand the stereotype that other clubs supporters have of our supporters we can't accept other teams have been better than us we have to hang on to "well they cheated" or " the umps have it in for us " :roll:
No need to bag saints fans coz all supporter bases have fans that use those excuses. hungry makes a valid and scientific point without being agressive in his argument. of course that doesnt mean the weagles won in 06 as they were all high.
Last edited by Old Mate on Tue 17 Jan 2012 9:01pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 1187874Post st_Trav_ofWA »

I disagree every person I have ever seen on speed yes does have lots of energy but also the attention span of a 4 year old and lack any co-ordination to possibly play AFL at any level ..


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
Post Reply