I am very excited about milera

MC Gusto · Post: # 1184973Post **MC Gusto** » Mon 26 Dec 2011 9:57am

Hearing great things! He should be a saintsational sponsorship player.

This kid is going to be electric

Choppa · Post: # 1184976Post **Choppa** » Mon 26 Dec 2011 10:30am

You haven't convinced me with that post.

White Winmar · Mon 26 Dec 2011 11:13am

I agree MC Gusto. I've seen him play twice and he definitely has the X factor. Like any mercurial players he can be a bit hit and miss, but I suppose that goes with the territory. He definitely has the skill, it's just a matter of him finding consistency at the top level.

With the academy coming on line and a new emphasis on development, I'm sure he'll get the assistance and opportunities he needs. If he comes off, he'll be exactly what we need!

Con Gorozidis · Mon 26 Dec 2011 3:26pm

can anyone report on his progress at training and the what was the go with the moon boot?

i think his main challenge will be in the gym and getting his strength and body up to afl standards.

hungry for a premiership · Mon 26 Dec 2011 9:50pm

i got the impression he needs to put on some bulk...

Is his body up to afl standard?

Bernard Shakey · Mon 26 Dec 2011 9:56pm

Not settling in too well is what I've heard.

MCG-Unit · Post: # 1185135Post **MCG-Unit** » Mon 26 Dec 2011 10:34pm

hungry for a premiership wrote:i got the impression he needs to put on some bulk...

Is his body up to afl standard?

Yes I was concerned when Milera was drafted and listed at 183 and only 68k on his Saints profile - they have since amended that to 77k

Con Gorozidis · Mon 26 Dec 2011 11:54pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:Not settling in too well is what I've heard.

more info please?

matrix · Post: # 1185150Post **matrix** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 8:21am

notice that they never do give up the decent info?

'oh ive heard he is not happy'

'reports are he is not good enough'

says nothing
means nothing

drop the charade and actually say what youve heard, from who and how.
if not
its a crock

stinger · Post: # 1185152Post **stinger** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:02am

matrix wrote:notice that they never do give up the decent info?

'oh ive heard he is not happy'

'reports are he is not good enough'

says nothing
means nothing

drop the charade and actually say what youve heard, from who and how.
if not
its a crock

must be going on a dozen now......things we agree on....

plugger66 · Post: # 1185154Post **plugger66** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:08am

matrix wrote:notice that they never do give up the decent info?

'oh ive heard he is not happy'

'reports are he is not good enough'

says nothing
means nothing

drop the charade and actually say what youve heard, from who and how.
if not
its a crock

The guy who started the thread is also saying things with no backup. Do we only need backup on negative reports?

SaintPav · Post: # 1185156Post **SaintPav** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:17am

plugger66 wrote:
matrix wrote:notice that they never do give up the decent info?

'oh ive heard he is not happy'

'reports are he is not good enough'

says nothing
means nothing

drop the charade and actually say what youve heard, from who and how.
if not
its a crock
The guy who started the thread is also saying things with no backup. Do we only need backup on negative reports?

That is true but the OP is an opinion while the negative comment has been stated as a fact so not exatly the same.

plugger66 · Post: # 1185157Post **plugger66** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:20am

SaintPav wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
matrix wrote:notice that they never do give up the decent info?

'oh ive heard he is not happy'

'reports are he is not good enough'

says nothing
means nothing

drop the charade and actually say what youve heard, from who and how.
if not
its a crock
The guy who started the thread is also saying things with no backup. Do we only need backup on negative reports?
That is true but the OP is an opinion while the negative comment has been stated as a fact so not exatly the same.

But he starts it by saying hearing great things. Probably neither are hearing any things.

SaintPav · Post: # 1185158Post **SaintPav** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:21am

plugger66 wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
matrix wrote:notice that they never do give up the decent info?

'oh ive heard he is not happy'

'reports are he is not good enough'

says nothing
means nothing

drop the charade and actually say what youve heard, from who and how.
if not
its a crock
The guy who started the thread is also saying things with no backup. Do we only need backup on negative reports?
That is true but the OP is an opinion while the negative comment has been stated as a fact so not exatly the same.
But he starts it by saying hearing great things. Probably neither are hearing any things.

true..

MC Gusto · Post: # 1185159Post **MC Gusto** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:23am

Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche

plugger66 · Post: # 1185160Post **plugger66** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:24am

MC Gusto wrote:Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche

Well lets face it one of you arent telling the truth. That we can be sure of.

SaintPav · Post: # 1185163Post **SaintPav** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 9:51am

MC Gusto wrote:Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche

What about Walsh? Is he still staying at St Kilda?

gringo · Post: # 1185165Post **gringo** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 11:17am

plugger66 wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche
Well lets face it one of you arent telling the truth. That we can be sure of.

I think he did himself a world of credibility by correctly labeling you douche though Plugger.

jays · Post: # 1185178Post **jays** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 1:53pm

cant wait aswell

Mackaysaint · Tue 27 Dec 2011 1:58pm

Con Gorozidis wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:Not settling in too well is what I've heard.
more info please?

Are you going to make this statement then simply ignore the request for some sort of clarification?

I hope its not true.

Wrote for Luck · Tue 27 Dec 2011 6:38pm

god, this thread is going well

MC Gusto · Post: # 1185193Post **MC Gusto** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 7:02pm

SaintPav wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche
What about Walsh? Is he still staying at St Kilda?

I was told he would stay.

I was then told Sydney were going hard 5 days before the papers or mugs like you even had a smidge of an idea. Get a clue fuxk face

plugger66 · Post: # 1185194Post **plugger66** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 7:10pm

MC Gusto wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche
What about Walsh? Is he still staying at St Kilda?

I was told he would stay.

I was then told Sydney were going hard 5 days before the papers or mugs like you even had a smidge of an idea. Get a clue fuxk face

All I can say is Ross Lyon and Jason Gram.

SaintPav · Post: # 1185195Post **SaintPav** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 7:26pm

MC Gusto wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
MC Gusto wrote:Source - N wombat Burke

Also confirmed plugger66 is a douche
What about Walsh? Is he still staying at St Kilda?

I was told he would stay.

I was then told Sydney were going hard 5 days before the papers or mugs like you even had a smidge of an idea. Get a clue fuxk face

LOL...Doesn't sound like you had any idea in the first place and you still don't but I wouldn't expect anything more from the likes of someone like you.

Old Mate · Post: # 1185197Post **Old Mate** » Tue 27 Dec 2011 7:45pm

Easy up. I enjoy the inside info. even if its not 100% true.

MC was close to spot on with TW. Said Syd were interested and going hard before the media reported a thing. Thought he was closer to staying than going. You cant flame him for that.