NEW Betting Scandal (NOT Saints) !!

Eastern · Post: # 1183067Post **Eastern** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 5:48pm

The AFL has called a Press Conference for 6.30pm today regarding the betting plunge on Nathan Bok (Gold Coast) to kick the 1st goal in their Rd 24 clash with Hawthorn. Bok DID kick the 1st goal. Source; SEN!!

SainterK · Post: # 1183068Post **SainterK** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 5:59pm

Bock and his mum

IluvHarvey · Wed 14 Dec 2011 6:17pm

Is this for real?

i can't find anything on any of the News websites

Con Gorozidis · Wed 14 Dec 2011 6:23pm

is legit

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-sp ... 1oumy.html

SaintSimmo · Wed 14 Dec 2011 6:27pm

Kim Hagdorm all over it again....
http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/artic ... -gambling/

That bloke must have a time machine....oh wait his articles are always wrong

kosifantutti23 · Wed 14 Dec 2011 6:39pm

McQualter can play full back.

Sick Nal Danto · Wed 14 Dec 2011 6:59pm

kosifantutti23 wrote:McQualter can play full back.

dcstkfc · Post: # 1183094Post **dcstkfc** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 7:18pm

Good news for St Kilda, he will miss our Rd 2 clash.

Dr Spaceman · Wed 14 Dec 2011 7:27pm

dcstkfc wrote:Good news for St Kilda, he will miss our Rd 2 clash.

Bock the following week?

IluvHarvey · Wed 14 Dec 2011 7:30pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:
dcstkfc wrote:Good news for St Kilda, he will miss our Rd 2 clash.
Bock the following week?

Yep.

2 week ban and fined $10,000 I think.

His brother claimed over 40k in successful bets I believe.

ausfatcat · Post: # 1183105Post **ausfatcat** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 8:06pm

should be fined for more than what was won on the game imo, imagine if he was aware of the bets?

jays · Post: # 1183116Post **jays** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 9:22pm

lol luv the title not saints

Eastern · Post: # 1183117Post **Eastern** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 9:26pm

jays wrote:lol luv the title not saints

Done in the interests of some of the weaker hearts around here (mine included)

!!

saintspremiers · Wed 14 Dec 2011 9:28pm

jays wrote:lol luv the title not saints

It's relevant to us now as he has been suspended from our clash. Please leave it on this board mods!

Rosco · Post: # 1183120Post **Rosco** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 9:32pm

Incomprehensible. I hope he gave his brother / mate a whack for passing the info on (if the story is to be believed)

SainterK · Post: # 1183126Post **SainterK** » Wed 14 Dec 2011 10:01pm

So, just a question...what would his loss of salary add up to roughly for those two weeks?

Something weird about him telling the club straight after the match, why did he feel he had to come clean at that point, as opposed to not telling his brother in the first place?

Enrico_Misso · Wed 14 Dec 2011 10:20pm

SainterK wrote:So, just a question...what would his loss of salary add up to roughly for those two weeks?

Something weird about him telling the club straight after the match, why did he feel he had to come clean at that point, as opposed to not telling his brother in the first place?

Didn't he have some anger management issues with his wife/girlfriend back in his Adelaide days?

The Redeemer · Thu 15 Dec 2011 12:06am

Enrico_Misso wrote:
SainterK wrote:So, just a question...what would his loss of salary add up to roughly for those two weeks?

Something weird about him telling the club straight after the match, why did he feel he had to come clean at that point, as opposed to not telling his brother in the first place?
Didn't he have some anger management issues with his wife/girlfriend back in his Adelaide days?

So anger management and gambling are tied together somehow?

No, no they are not.

Enrico_Misso · Thu 15 Dec 2011 1:05am

Maybe they both indicate he is not living in the real world.
Thinks because he is an AA footballer that the normal society codes of behaviour don't apply to him.
See W Carey, G Abblett Snr etc. etc.

The Redeemer · Thu 15 Dec 2011 1:56am

Enrico_Misso wrote:Maybe they both indicate he is not living in the real world.
Thinks because he is an AA footballer that the normal society codes of behaviour don't apply to him.
See W Carey, G Abblett Snr etc. etc.

people gamble and get into trouble and people have anger issues in the real world?

Go Sainters Go · Thu 15 Dec 2011 12:41pm

The GCFC has named Bock at FB in the official Team Sheet - as such, the Club is a party to the case by issuing false information to the AFL and Public, surely, as he commenced the game in the forward line as he advised his family/friends.
The two bit Solicitor of course will be aware of this but because it's one of the AFL/Demitriou's love childs, this point will be swept under the carpet.

plugger66 · Thu 15 Dec 2011 12:47pm

Go Sainters Go wrote:The GCFC has named Bock at FB in the official Team Sheet - as such, the Club is a party to the case by issuing false information to the AFL and Public, surely, as he commenced the game in the forward line as he advised his family/friends.
The two bit Solicitor of course will be aware of this but because it's one of the AFL/Demitriou's love childs, this point will be swept under the carpet.

I dont get what you are saying? Are you saying every club should get in trouble then for lying on their team sheet?

shmic_s · Post: # 1183207Post **shmic_s** » Thu 15 Dec 2011 12:50pm

plugger66 wrote:
Go Sainters Go wrote:The GCFC has named Bock at FB in the official Team Sheet - as such, the Club is a party to the case by issuing false information to the AFL and Public, surely, as he commenced the game in the forward line as he advised his family/friends.
The two bit Solicitor of course will be aware of this but because it's one of the AFL/Demitriou's love childs, this point will be swept under the carpet.
I dont get what you are saying? Are you saying every club should get in trouble then for lying on their team sheet?

Herald Sun/media would have trouble formatting a team sheet when Fremantle start with a 5 man forward line.

Sainternist · Thu 15 Dec 2011 2:07pm

Ah, it has been so refreshing that our club hasn't been involved in any scandals over the off-season period.

And *touchwood* that it will stay that way

Dan Warna · Post: # 1183393Post **Dan Warna** » Fri 16 Dec 2011 6:24am

seems to be punished less than previous offenses.

Is this protection of a weaker team or a less serious nature of crime than other better scandals?