And in your case, downright boring.stinger wrote:...typical and predictable.....
Cretan....... LOL.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
nah....just having a bit of fun with the usual suspects...they can't help themselves.....like rats to a rotten carcass...someone starts a thread like this and the same troublemakers and bullies pile in accusing me of starting all the s*** on here when in fact i mainly ignore them, and some i ignore completely....have done for months...the only one with the balls to admit he's part of the problem is plugga...Hammer wrote:Wow!
Stinger, you seem to have posted many times on this thread.
Feeling a bit sensitive?
nah...i have had my say...i'm outa here....going to the gym...then i will see what the educated amongst us have to say on our rookie recruits...matrix wrote:well at least the thread is living up to its potential
i'll get the popcorn....
Exit Stinger... Stage Right.... chased by 50,000 Cretans whose ethnicity has been dishonoured.stinger wrote:nah...i have had my say...i'm outa here....going to the gym...then i will see what the educated amongst us have to say on our rookie recruits...matrix wrote:well at least the thread is living up to its potential
i'll get the popcorn....
At least now I know one person listened to me...joffaboy wrote:Just ignore the trolls and troublemakers, dont feed them, and if they respond ignore them once again. Dont directly respond to their aggressiveness and attempted bullying, because as well all know, bullies are cowards.
They get very frustrated and eventually run away.
This can be a very good place to discuss football, especially the Saints, if you dont allow the usual suspects (we all know who) to wreck the thread or threads.
Sorry, I ignore you usually troublemakerHSVKing wrote:At least now I know one person listened to me...joffaboy wrote:Just ignore the trolls and troublemakers, dont feed them, and if they respond ignore them once again. Dont directly respond to their aggressiveness and attempted bullying, because as well all know, bullies are cowards.
They get very frustrated and eventually run away.
This can be a very good place to discuss football, especially the Saints, if you dont allow the usual suspects (we all know who) to wreck the thread or threads.
plugger66 wrote:All I know is that I am not part of the problem. I mostly just start threads and only discuss our great club but I agree there are a few others who are just argumentative. It would be a much better site if people just agreed with each other even if their facts are wrong or their opinions baseless.
I thought your baiting of Inkersaint on that topic was terrible and believe you are one of the worst troublemakers on the forum.skeptic wrote: have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
I disagree with BM when he states opinions as facts. You may think I follow his posts around but I only comment on ones that IMO are factually wrong or have a baseless opinion. By the way he may also be following around some of my posts and then commenting on them but he is that arrogant he doesnt use the quote button. Maybe because of that you have no idea who he is responding to but I certainly do. By the way I certainly never start name calling, swearing or insults however some people cant take being questioned about things that are clearly incorrect and then start with the insults. That is like a bull at a gate to me.skeptic wrote:plugger66 wrote:All I know is that I am not part of the problem. I mostly just start threads and only discuss our great club but I agree there are a few others who are just argumentative. It would be a much better site if people just agreed with each other even if their facts are wrong or their opinions baseless.
how about if we simply responded we actually had something worthwhile to say... rather than just to start a fight.
Case in point, look at the guys that just follow Big Mart around... he's not the only negative 1 around here but a handful of forumites simply follow him around and attempt... rather poorly most times... to criticise his POV
more often than not... it doesn't even relate to the topic and derails it
there's a difference between disagreeing and baiting plugger
have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
I agree it was poor to continue slelecting him and that we may have developed someone else in his place.
He argues that statiscally he was clearly the best player and that injuries meant we didnt have options to replace him.
We've locked horns on it in maybe 2-3 threads in a year and a half... no name calling, no insults, no following each other around and criticising. It's good to debate... bad to seek attention and play agendas
joffaboy wrote:I thought your baiting of Inkersaint on that topic was terrible and believe you are one of the worst troublemakers on the forum.skeptic wrote: have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
You
SainterK
Dr Spaceman
Saint66au
and
Mr Magic.
You all should be banned.
SEE! SEE!Dr Spaceman wrote:joffaboy wrote:I thought your baiting of Inkersaint on that topic was terrible and believe you are one of the worst troublemakers on the forum.skeptic wrote: have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
You
SainterK
Dr Spaceman
Saint66au
and
Mr Magic.
You all should be banned.
What about me?joffaboy wrote:I thought your baiting of Inkersaint on that topic was terrible and believe you are one of the worst troublemakers on the forum.skeptic wrote: have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
You
SainterK
Dr Spaceman
Saint66au
and
Mr Magic.
You all should be banned.
No GO, the five have been named (and shamed).GrumpyOne wrote:What about me?joffaboy wrote:I thought your baiting of Inkersaint on that topic was terrible and believe you are one of the worst troublemakers on the forum.skeptic wrote: have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
You
SainterK
Dr Spaceman
Saint66au
and
Mr Magic.
You all should be banned.
It isn't fair.
I've had enough now.
I want my share.
Can't you see?
But I'm a bad boy.joffaboy wrote:No GO, the five have been named (and shamed).GrumpyOne wrote:What about me?joffaboy wrote:I thought your baiting of Inkersaint on that topic was terrible and believe you are one of the worst troublemakers on the forum.skeptic wrote: have a look at threads between Inkersaint and myself... we clearly both disagree on the topic regarding McQualter's selection in 2010.
You
SainterK
Dr Spaceman
Saint66au
and
Mr Magic.
You all should be banned.
It isn't fair.
I've had enough now.
I want my share.
Can't you see?
They must repent and lead a chaste cyber life from now on.
they have been exposed as the 5 troublemakers because....
I NAMED NAMES!!!!!!!!