Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Yeah, but when he missed they invariably resulted in goals, and often not to his direct opponent, hence people think he did his job, when he just gave the opposition opportunities.
And considering that first one would correctly be called as a free kick, not a great example
Whats with the notion that Zac n Clarke are top spoilers? Too often one would go up third man up only for the ball to fall over the back of the pack to the advantage of the oppostion. If u go up to spoil you do not I repeat do not let it fall to the back of the pack.
Now thats off my chest, I wonder what draft pick he would be worth? Hopefully a club shows interest in him and scares freo to use one of their earlier ones. Got to laugh as they played hardball and missed Mitch then end up paying overs for Zac. I wish we hadve gotten that last minute deal done for him. So much for the most untrustworthy bloke in the afl not wanting any players from his old club. I wonder how an anchor fits in a bubble
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
At Hawthorn Dawson had an immature body and was well beaten by the best; At St.Kilda Dawson developed an immature mind and rates himself higher than his abilities actually are.
stinger wrote:At Hawthorn Dawson had an immature body and was well beaten by the best; At St.Kilda Dawson developed an immature mind and rates himself higher than his abilities actually are.
I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
I bet no-one even notices he's gone, when we beat those teams with star tall forwards, whoever they may be.
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Agree.
Zac may have been a d!ckhead off field but did an excellent job at FB.
Let's hope we draft some smokey instant gun FB. Yeah and that is likely.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Not sure v Hawks is a good example this year, in Rd 8 Buddy booted 5/5 v St Kilda.
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Reckon Jimmy Gwilt could make a fair fist of it
Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Reckon Jimmy Gwilt could make a fair fist of it
Out to at least R5 and then it takes a season to get back to their best (see Dempster)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Reckon Jimmy Gwilt could make a fair fist of it
Out to at least R5 and then it takes a season to get back to their best (see Dempster)
Fair call Joff..yeh Dempster..even Gilbert ..has the pace and height ...Zac will not be missed as much as people fear IMHO
Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....
'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05
"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
Con Gorozidis wrote:I think all the people that bag Zac are going to notice the hole a lot more when we play against the Hawks (and any other star tall fwd in the afl) and start asking - oh so who plays on Buddy again
Reckon Jimmy Gwilt could make a fair fist of it
Out to at least R5 and then it takes a season to get back to their best (see Dempster)
Fair call Joff..yeh Dempster..even Gilbert ..has the pace and height ...Zac will not be missed as much as people fear IMHO
Its not his loss per se, it is the overall depth in the backline that concerns me.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
SainterK wrote:Actually, I think you will find they were all told to fist it.
Oh SainterK, that did not come out sounding good
But yeah, I know where you're coming from. RL wanted that from all our defenders. Dawson just seemed to stand out the most (apart from maybe Dempster) as being a stalwart to the ultra defensive style of game instructed by RL.
Seeing the back of Dawson in a way is sort of symbolic of us moving on to another era and under new regime.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
SainterK wrote:Actually, I think you will find they were all told to fist it.
Oh SainterK, that did not come out sounding good
But yeah, I know where you're coming from. RL wanted that from all our defenders. Dawson just seemed to stand out the most (apart from maybe Dempster) as being a stalwart to the ultra defensive style of game instructed by RL.
Seeing the back of Dawson in a way is sort of symbolic of us moving on to another era and under new regime.
No other team would take Dawkson apart from Fremantle. He is slow of mind and short on ability
...about right
