Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Not really, he was mentioned in relation to Milne, which is still a stretch though…Little Dozer wrote:Lockett being mentioned in a conversation about Zac Dawson?SaintJohn1956 wrote:When we lost Lockett to Sydney, I'm pretty sure that allowed us to get Smith (eventaully lost to Hawthorn),Aussie Jones and Tony Brown (lost to SA but league B&F there {I think} also a player by the name of Hudhton.
Exactly, Zac did not play tall and failed to spol the stronger marking players in the comp. Let him go I say. It will only be for a small time if he gets another gig elsewhere. as he needs continual help from his backline and this cant always be afforded by the mid field and cost us froward structure at times.samoht wrote:Zac played like a fool back sometimes... was made to look reliable by his team mates. One on one vs Cloke forget it !
One on one is the real test.
How did Zac "cost us froward structure at times"?kalsaint wrote:Exactly, Zac did not play tall and failed to spol the stronger marking players in the comp. Let him go I say. It will only be for a small time if he gets another gig elsewhere. as he needs continual help from his backline and this cant always be afforded by the mid field and cost us froward structure at times.samoht wrote:Zac played like a fool back sometimes... was made to look reliable by his team mates. One on one vs Cloke forget it !
One on one is the real test.
I summary, he cost goals by poor decisions at times and cost goals by alienating or forwards from the goal line when he was helped.
Who cares? He's a spud, let him go.SaintPav wrote:How did Zac "cost us froward structure at times"?kalsaint wrote:Exactly, Zac did not play tall and failed to spol the stronger marking players in the comp. Let him go I say. It will only be for a small time if he gets another gig elsewhere. as he needs continual help from his backline and this cant always be afforded by the mid field and cost us froward structure at times.samoht wrote:Zac played like a fool back sometimes... was made to look reliable by his team mates. One on one vs Cloke forget it !
One on one is the real test.
I summary, he cost goals by poor decisions at times and cost goals by alienating or forwards from the goal line when he was helped.
If he was that bad, why would RL want him at Freo?
Well it's all a bit meaningless now isn't it?Moccha wrote:Shut this farken thread down. It's all a pile of bulls***
...no brown and jones were picked up with picks we already had.......max was the next year......we got smith who pissed off after only three years,chris hemley ...who played one game for nil possessions....robbie neale, glenn nugent and josh kitchen....three duds ffs....SaintJohn1956 wrote:When we lost Lockett to Sydney, I'm pretty sure that allowed us to get Smith (eventaully lost to Hawthorn),Aussie Jones and Tony Brown (lost to SA but league B&F there {I think} also a player by the name of Hudhton.
:roll:either that or they have very poor memories..... 
Dr Spaceman wrote:Nice tackle.dragit wrote:Carn' moccha don't be like that, you keep coming back for more so you must secretly love it?Moccha wrote:Shut this farken thread down. It's all a pile of bulls***
Spuds, Michael Kasprowicz, it has everything and now it has this…
BALL!!!!!
noddy04 wrote:Dr Spaceman wrote:Nice tackle.dragit wrote:Carn' moccha don't be like that, you keep coming back for more so you must secretly love it?Moccha wrote:Shut this farken thread down. It's all a pile of bulls***
Spuds, Michael Kasprowicz, it has everything and now it has this…
BALL!!!!!
Its a pity Zac never laid a tackle like that. He is gone ...hope Rooey runs him into the dirt when we play freo. And Stinger PLEASE stop calling Mike Sheahan "noddy" I am getting an inferiority complex LOL
yep.Moccha wrote:"I think we're in good shape, we've done a lot of work, we're where we need to be and we're very confident that we'll have all the people we want to sign ... signed up within the next couple of days.''
New coach Scott Watters reiterated Nettlefold's stance, but indicated there were only deals on the table for "three'' of the above quartet.
Nice slap in the face for Dawson. Maybe it's another way of saying you're not wanted?
i'm not so sure. writing was on the wall for him. game is going away from the type of full back he is.Teflon wrote:yep.Moccha wrote:"I think we're in good shape, we've done a lot of work, we're where we need to be and we're very confident that we'll have all the people we want to sign ... signed up within the next couple of days.''
New coach Scott Watters reiterated Nettlefold's stance, but indicated there were only deals on the table for "three'' of the above quartet.
Nice slap in the face for Dawson. Maybe it's another way of saying you're not wanted?
It could simply be "lets save face on another loss......"
Reality is we would like to keep Dawson Im sure.....
it was reported he signed a new 2 year deal 5-6 weeks agoSainterK wrote:What about Jones?
X tweeted about someone who finished top 10 has to take a pay cut, Dempster wasn't a consistent best 22 before this season so you wouldn't think he'd of been on huge money?
Could he be tempted last minute to go to Freo, there has been no official signing as yet?
May be a left field one.
Yea Jones signed new contract before the B&F, hence why his name has never come up in the un-contracted list.skeptic wrote:it was reported he signed a new 2 year deal 5-6 weeks agoSainterK wrote:What about Jones?
X tweeted about someone who finished top 10 has to take a pay cut, Dempster wasn't a consistent best 22 before this season so you wouldn't think he'd of been on huge money?
Could he be tempted last minute to go to Freo, there has been no official signing as yet?
May be a left field one.
for mine, he is your ideal choice for a pay cut/cut but doubt it will happen
ppl seem to think he is an elite class player
