Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Well lets see. RL was to sign for 4 years with us and he is gone. Walsh has already signed with us which at this stage isnt correct and you said there was only 2 in for the coaches job even though the Saints said 3. Can tell us what you have got right?
New that Carlton was after gram
New that Syd was after Walsh
Have been told a number of times it was down to Hinkley and watters - prove me wrong
Was told that Walsh was elevated and got confused this was contracted - corrected it same day
You might be right... doesn't mean anything will come of it.
If Watters is an admirer of Gram's and has plans for him, surely this trade negotiation is dead.
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
Well lets see. RL was to sign for 4 years with us and he is gone. Walsh has already signed with us which at this stage isnt correct and you said there was only 2 in for the coaches job even though the Saints said 3. Can tell us what you have got right?
I think the club thought RL was signing for 4 years!
Keep em coming MC... I don't understand why people shoot down others that get some mail. It's usually pretty obvious that someone is making crap up or actually has heard a whisper.
SainterK wrote:Sentanta, Bower, Lucas are names I've heard on the table at Carlton.
No thanks, no thanks, and no thanks...
Gram better than all 3 put together...
Enough Bower types already, got our own Irishman, and Lucas very average...
I am completely with you on this. Besides, the boss wants to keep Gramsy. I reckon Watters is going to get a lot more out the"fringe players" Ross 'Shallow Hal' Lyon did