Daniel Pearce

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Maklom
Club Player
Posts: 111
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:07am

Post: # 1160986Post Maklom »

If he wants to get out of SA then Port can have Gram, Raph and Gamble for him. Fixes our SC and we get a guy with pace, skills and can hit the side of a barn by foot for a change.


redwhite&blackblood
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2246
Joined: Thu 18 Mar 2004 5:14pm
Location: Level 1 Aisle 37 Row G Telstra Dome

Post: # 1161012Post redwhite&blackblood »

bergholt wrote:
St Ick wrote:Apparently not Plugg, but what on earth was RL on when he spoke of Mitch Clark?
maybe he had a plan for freeing up space in the cap to fit clark in... it's much easier to make massive trade calls as the senior coach than as the "list manager" or whatever pelchen's calling himself.
He forgot he wasn't at Freo yet.


Bleeding Red, Black and White for 38 years!
Life Motto - Fortius Quo Fidelius
Raph "Cult Hero" Clarke Fan Club.
User avatar
InkerSaint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm

Post: # 1161096Post InkerSaint »

St Ick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Dont people read or listen. We have no money in our salary cap.
Apparently not Plugg, but what on earth was RL on when he spoke of Mitch Clark?
If the Saints are serious about bringing in a ruckman they'd have earmarked some cash to get the deal done. RL may have gone but the need for another ruckman hasn't.

Or (and here's another possibility), RL had a plan to free up some cash involving trading out a well-paid player.

What are the odds of RL and CP having fallen out over list management?


"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
Royston
Club Player
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon 15 Dec 2008 6:19pm
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Post: # 1161126Post Royston »

InkerSaint wrote:
St Ick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Dont people read or listen. We have no money in our salary cap.
Apparently not Plugg, but what on earth was RL on when he spoke of Mitch Clark?
If the Saints are serious about bringing in a ruckman they'd have earmarked some cash to get the deal done. RL may have gone but the need for another ruckman hasn't.

Or (and here's another possibility), RL had a plan to free up some cash involving trading out a well-paid player.

What are the odds of RL and CP having fallen out over list management?
A big chance there was a difference of opinion in relation to the list and any proposed changes / trading / drafting...


St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Post: # 1161130Post St Ick »

Royston wrote:
InkerSaint wrote:
St Ick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Dont people read or listen. We have no money in our salary cap.
Apparently not Plugg, but what on earth was RL on when he spoke of Mitch Clark?
If the Saints are serious about bringing in a ruckman they'd have earmarked some cash to get the deal done. RL may have gone but the need for another ruckman hasn't.

Or (and here's another possibility), RL had a plan to free up some cash involving trading out a well-paid player.

What are the odds of RL and CP having fallen out over list management?
A big chance there was a difference of opinion in relation to the list and any proposed changes / trading / drafting...
The was speculation that Pelchin had more power (was higher in the pecking order) than Ross, so its highly likely they would have clashed over something, at some stage considering what is reported in the media about each of their personalities.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5413
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Post: # 1161246Post saintly »

meher baba wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Dont people read or listen. We have no money in our salary cap.
Yes, the club has let it be known that it only wants to trade for draft picks and not players. But we don't want to let facts get in the way of people's fun.

I've read hundreds of these threads on this forum and can't recall any of them ever coming true.

Salopek FFS!
obviously we can't afford the 2 recruits we picked up?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1161249Post plugger66 »

saintly wrote:
meher baba wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Dont people read or listen. We have no money in our salary cap.
Yes, the club has let it be known that it only wants to trade for draft picks and not players. But we don't want to let facts get in the way of people's fun.

I've read hundreds of these threads on this forum and can't recall any of them ever coming true.

Salopek FFS!
obviously we can't afford the 2 recruits we picked up?
They would be on the minimum and you must have a full list so they make no difference.


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Post: # 1161251Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

I guess we've gotten a "cheaper" version of Pearce in Milera, hopefully bringing a similar set of skills and speed to the table.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3638
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 492 times
Been thanked: 316 times

Post: # 1161322Post saintbob »

BigMart wrote:and we complain about about Gram being soft.......He makes Gram look like Lenny Hayes...

Mentally weak player......physically weak player......his record agaist us is atrocious
Agree 100%


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 1161520Post BigMart »

He could play that damaging HB or Back Pocket that runs the ball out of defense with no accountability.......until a team puts a good fwd on him who takes him to the cleaners in a grand final.....S.Johnson, T.Varcoe...

Davis, O'Brien were found out on the biggest stage....by good fwds...I wish Ross had of done this in 2010


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 1161528Post gringo »

InkerSaint wrote:
St Ick wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Dont people read or listen. We have no money in our salary cap.
Apparently not Plugg, but what on earth was RL on when he spoke of Mitch Clark?
If the Saints are serious about bringing in a ruckman they'd have earmarked some cash to get the deal done. RL may have gone but the need for another ruckman hasn't.

Or (and here's another possibility), RL had a plan to free up some cash involving trading out a well-paid player.

What are the odds of RL and CP having fallen out over list management?
Quite possible that it was where the clash started, if lyon wanted to trade out Rooey or something big and the board saw it as losing a marketing machine and a fav son -who knows, maybe despite what Pelchen wanted. Ross might have wanted to trade out a big name and recruit Gumbleton and the Pelican said no. Guess we will here two versions later down the track.


Post Reply