best and fairest
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
geez that's a disappointing result from kosi...played the majority of games and finished 22nd and 55 points behind the next in polo. you only have to look at the players that polled behind him...no regulars...you could say that kosi was our worst performing player that got a regular game, and by far.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sun 01 May 2005 11:20pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
How is 13 the majority of games?Old Mate wrote:geez that's a disappointing result from kosi...played the majority of games and finished 22nd and 55 points behind the next in polo. you only have to look at the players that polled behind him...no regulars...you could say that kosi was our worst performing player that got a regular game, and by far.
I'd say he finished about where expected given that fact.
Polo 19th - 15 games
Farren 20th - 21 games
Blake 21st - 12 games
Kosi 22nd - 13 games
Bakes 23rd - 10 games
I'd like to know how he polled his last 6 weeks compared to the first 6, that was a better indication of his formline given he had continuity and was trending in a better direction.
Strange ones for mine, was Gram 10th, Ben 12th, and above all Farren at 20th.
No he finished where i expected because he is Kosi.SainterK wrote:How is 13 the majority of games?Old Mate wrote:geez that's a disappointing result from kosi...played the majority of games and finished 22nd and 55 points behind the next in polo. you only have to look at the players that polled behind him...no regulars...you could say that kosi was our worst performing player that got a regular game, and by far.
I'd say he finished about where expected given that fact.
Polo 19th - 15 games
Farren 20th - 21 games
Blake 21st - 12 games
Kosi 22nd - 13 games
Bakes 23rd - 10 games
I'd like to know how he polled his last 6 weeks compared to the first 6, that was a better indication of his formline given he had continuity and was trending in a better direction.
Strange ones for mine, was Gram 10th, Ben 12th, and above all Farren at 20th.
Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Best news of the night is that Alwaysaway said he is stepping down.
The elephant in the room was never mentioned.
Westaway said nothing about our coaching situation.
What was with Nettlefold's glasses?
Did he sit on them.
Or is his head crooked.
The elephant in the room was never mentioned.
Westaway said nothing about our coaching situation.
What was with Nettlefold's glasses?
Did he sit on them.
Or is his head crooked.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Congrats to Sammy F, well done.
Not hanging s*** but I think a bigger issue is getting our 5 time B and F player back on track after finishing 8th and only missing one game.
Get the psych's into his head, get a kicking coach into his routine, get his fitness up and let him rip it up for the next 2-3 years.
Not hanging s*** but I think a bigger issue is getting our 5 time B and F player back on track after finishing 8th and only missing one game.
Get the psych's into his head, get a kicking coach into his routine, get his fitness up and let him rip it up for the next 2-3 years.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4951
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 497 times
Got nothing against Sam Fisher, so well done to him - but I'm bamboozled that Dal didn't finish 1st by a country mile. What game is the match committee watching?
When I see the finishing order - particularly McEvoy 12th - I reckon they have no clue, and the whole B&F has been devalued. Just my initial impressions....
When I see the finishing order - particularly McEvoy 12th - I reckon they have no clue, and the whole B&F has been devalued. Just my initial impressions....
I think 5 people can vote for as many players as they like and can give up to 10 votes per player. As for someone saying Rooy didnt vote well, well there was one moronic suggesting on here he may not even get a vote. I think he finished pretty much exactly where he should of. Ben was disappointing and I thought Dal was a certainty.fingers wrote:Does anyone know the criteria and manner that points are allocated?
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Remember Fisher was our best player by a mile in the first half of the year and the votes showed that. He as leading by about 90 after round 15.Moods wrote:Got nothing against Sam Fisher, so well done to him - but I'm bamboozled that Dal didn't finish 1st by a country mile. What game is the match committee watching?
When I see the finishing order - particularly McEvoy 12th - I reckon they have no clue, and the whole B&F has been devalued. Just my initial impressions....
In May I put some $ on Fisher to win because he was the only player really showing anything.
Dal was awesome in the second half - again votes reflected this as he only missed the award by 3. Would love to have seen him win. He deserves to be a B&F winner at the end of his career.
"When we get back on November 5 and walk through that door, we're getting on a bus together and we're going down the road to a premiership. You're either on the bus or you get run over," Roo at the B&F 2007
In 2012, I'm still on the bus.
In 2012, I'm still on the bus.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Fri 08 May 2009 12:59pm
- Location: Mill Park
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Yes, thats correct. Ben was the most imroved & Sean the most professional.millarsaint wrote:I thought the event was pretty good. Don't know why they took the camera off the auctioneer though. He was classic. Raised some pretty good amounts. And the MC shooshing constantly was a bit much.
I missed the start. What did Ben get? Most improved?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
The results confirm the season we had.
With all due respect to Dempster, he is not a match winner and the fact that he finished 3rd in our B&F off a servicable season as a dedicated role defender says it all.
The very fact that he out polled the likes of Montagna, Riewoldt and Goddard - and also McEvoy, Steven and Armitage who perform in our mid-field where games are won from is the commentary.
Apart from that there are no real surprises.
Fisher was the only player really standing up for much of the first half of the season.
It would be interesting to see who polled votes in games we lost (particularly against teams that finished in the top half of the ladder and against whom our results were very, very poor) - and in those we won easily to see who the "flat track bullies" and front runners are.
So game results v. votes awarded in those games should be the measurement.
With all due respect to Dempster, he is not a match winner and the fact that he finished 3rd in our B&F off a servicable season as a dedicated role defender says it all.
The very fact that he out polled the likes of Montagna, Riewoldt and Goddard - and also McEvoy, Steven and Armitage who perform in our mid-field where games are won from is the commentary.
Apart from that there are no real surprises.
Fisher was the only player really standing up for much of the first half of the season.
It would be interesting to see who polled votes in games we lost (particularly against teams that finished in the top half of the ladder and against whom our results were very, very poor) - and in those we won easily to see who the "flat track bullies" and front runners are.
So game results v. votes awarded in those games should be the measurement.
You know what the B& F does tell us. That joke side you had for next year had 4 of the top 7 in the B&F not in the side. Milne an AA this year. Dempster third, CJ sixth and Schneider 7th. How can people take some of the sides people pick seriously when those players are left out. And dont give us crap that they are getting older and need replacing. Why not replace the poor players down the list what ever age they are. The B&F isnt everything but it does tell us what the coaches think of our players compared to some supporters who think they now a good side.To the top wrote:The results confirm the season we had.
With all due respect to Dempster, he is not a match winner and the fact that he finished 3rd in our B&F off a servicable season as a dedicated role defender says it all.
The very fact that he out polled the likes of Montagna, Riewoldt and Goddard - and also McEvoy, Steven and Armitage who perform in our mid-field where games are won from is the commentary.
Apart from that there are no real surprises.
Fisher was the only player really standing up for much of the first half of the season.
It would be interesting to see who polled votes in games we lost (particularly against teams that finished in the top half of the ladder and against whom our results were very, very poor) - and in those we won easily to see who the "flat track bullies" and front runners are.
So game results v. votes awarded in those games should be the measurement.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Closeplugger66 wrote:I think 5 people can vote for as many players as they like and can give up to 10 votes per player. As for someone saying Rooy didnt vote well, well there was one moronic suggesting on here he may not even get a vote. I think he finished pretty much exactly where he should of. Ben was disappointing and I thought Dal was a certainty.fingers wrote:Does anyone know the criteria and manner that points are allocated?
The 4 coaches each vote Midnight Oil style.
10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1
so the max score any player can get in a round is 40
and the minimum as Craig Willis pointed out is - Zilch
But I couldn't help noticing that NDS according to the captions polled 41 in one round (might have been a typo).
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Yes.Saints94 wrote:Is Westaway leaving?Enrico_Misso wrote:Best news of the night is that Alwaysaway said he is stepping down.
The elephant in the room was never mentioned.
Westaway said nothing about our coaching situation.
What was with Nettlefold's glasses?
Did he sit on them.
Or is his head crooked.
Didn't say when.
But I would guess at the AGM.
He didn't make it clear if he was stepping down from the board or just the presidency.
Makes you wonder if he didn't do a deal with Nathan B - join my ticket (which will get me elected) and I'll hand over to you in 2012.
???
Just my speculation.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
I felt was better than in previous years at the venue and service was heaps betterEnrico_Misso wrote:The food was OK.
But did anyone else feel it was below expectation for the price?
- size of entree good and mains around what you'd fine in some restaurants.
for cost? that will always be up for debate.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
I wouldn't describe the proportions as "generous".saintbrat wrote:I felt was better than in previous years at teh venue and service was heaps betterEnrico_Misso wrote:The food was OK.
But did anyone else feel it was below expectation for the price?
- size of entree good and mains around what you'd fine in some restaurants.
for cost? that will always be up for debate.
I reckon there would be a few people buying a kebab on the way home.
Is that what you expect for $300+ ??
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!