Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
plugger66 wrote:Are people happy with anything? And we complain about papers being negative.
Are you ever happy with this forum?
I think you need to find something more up your alley.
Mate everyone of your posts are whinging about something so maybe you should have a good look in the mirror. Be careful not to look to hard you will probably get scared.
And every one of your posts are whinging about other people whinging!
If you don't like people whining, then perhaps a forum is not the place for you! That's pretty much what forums are all about.
plugger66 wrote:Are people happy with anything? And we complain about papers being negative.
Are you ever happy with this forum?
I think you need to find something more up your alley.
Mate everyone of your posts are whinging about something so maybe you should have a good look in the mirror. Be careful not to look to hard you will probably get scared.
This is just another example of his relevance to anything ...
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
If you go back over my history of posts, I would say that I am positive in my comments, and not negative, 99% of the time.
But it is a very tough time in my life, and I find myself getting upset at the most minor things. So I vented to check if I heard it right, which I didn't.
markinUSA wrote:If you go back over my history of posts, I would say that I am positive in my comments, and not negative, 99% of the time.
But it is a very tough time in my life, and I find myself getting upset at the most minor things. So I vented to check if I heard it right, which I didn't.
Don't worry about it mate....not a problem
Having seen some of Bruces, ahem, camper work in some old Sportsworld ads on Youtube, there's plenty of material to get annoyed at him about!
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
markinUSA wrote:If you go back over my history of posts, I would say that I am positive in my comments, and not negative, 99% of the time.
But it is a very tough time in my life, and I find myself getting upset at the most minor things. So I vented to check if I heard it right, which I didn't.
A forum is a place to vent. Saintly heaven knows I have done it enough recently.
As for Bruce, I have grown to find him annoying in the last few years, but my impersonation of 'delicious' certainly got a few laughs last night. Unfortunately, I was alone.....
Only saw part of the Brownlow coverage, but happened to hear that part with Dal Santo, no big deal, but not impressed by it.
McAvaney is generally a massive try-hard.
Dal_Santos_Gal wrote:I thought it was rather funny, I even smiled after Bruce said it.....
The comment didn't seem to bother Dal one little bit, I think he knew he wasn't going to beat Swan...
Exactly. A little tongue in cheek from Bruce. I definitely don't think he is a St.Kilda hater.
Perhaps we should have Luke Darcy presenting the Brownlow instead? *shudder*
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
markinUSA wrote:As Dal said he would finish his beer, McEvaney made a slur about him doing that and St Kilda's "culture". I was irate.
Dirty little slur from a man gerserving very little respect.
the guys a turd....and a little turd at that.....prior to that he was ignoring dal coming up the list......creep.....makes my skin crawl ....does that little prick
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
markinUSA wrote:As Dal said he would finish his beer, McEvaney made a slur about him doing that and St Kilda's "culture". I was irate.
Dirty little slur from a man gerserving very little respect.
the guys a turd....and a little turd at that.....prior to that he was ignoring dal coming up the list......creep.....makes my skin crawl ....does that little prick
Is there anyone you like? Seriously you are one very sad man and you also speak so well.
markinUSA wrote:If you go back over my history of posts, I would say that I am positive in my comments, and not negative, 99% of the time.
But it is a very tough time in my life, and I find myself getting upset at the most minor things. So I vented to check if I heard it right, which I didn't.
no you were right the first time.....when i heard it i thought...you prick.....
Last edited by stinger on Tue 27 Sep 2011 7:09pm, edited 1 time in total.
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Rosco wrote:yeah, not offended. now if he said "spoken like a true saint, as long as you follow it up with another 15 beers and finish the night in the clink" then i may not be that happy about it.
I was proud of Bruce's comment. It was bloody funny and Dal pissed his pants laughing when he heard it! It was a tongue in cheek comment referring to days long gone by.
At least Dal has a decent sense of humour! His suspenders attest to it!
"Whoa Doc, this is heavy." - Marty McFly following Ross Lyon's departure
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
On a slightly different tack, I thought the way he handled the Sam Mitchell inability to win and therefore his absence was handled so poorly.
Describing the scenario of Mitchell, at that stage, as he discussed the issue with Luke Hodge "as the elephant in the room" was maybe a topic best left unsaid. Hodge looked uncomfortable and wanted to be anywhere else rather answer McAvaney's stupid questions.
The Mitchell family have closer personal issues with the health of their babies, so do you think Sam Mitchell is going to worry about missing out on the Brownlow?
ozrulestrace wrote:On a slightly different tack, I thought the way he handled the Sam Mitchell inability to win and therefore his absence was handled so poorly.
Describing the scenario of Mitchell, at that stage, as he discussed the issue with Luke Hodge "as the elephant in the room" was maybe a topic best left unsaid. Hodge looked uncomfortable and wanted to be anywhere else rather answer McAvaney's stupid questions.
The Mitchell family have closer personal issues with the health of their babies, so do you think Sam Mitchell is going to worry about missing out on the Brownlow?
I thought Luke Hodge handled it beautifully though, thought he was very classy
You can listen to Bristle tell you Carlton are still a massive chance at 28 points down with two minutes to go, you can listen to him tell you all about Lorne, or you can watch a monkey on a pushbike...I know which I prefer...
ozrulestrace wrote:On a slightly different tack, I thought the way he handled the Sam Mitchell inability to win and therefore his absence was handled so poorly.
Describing the scenario of Mitchell, at that stage, as he discussed the issue with Luke Hodge "as the elephant in the room" was maybe a topic best left unsaid. Hodge looked uncomfortable and wanted to be anywhere else rather answer McAvaney's stupid questions.
The Mitchell family have closer personal issues with the health of their babies, so do you think Sam Mitchell is going to worry about missing out on the Brownlow?
I thought Luke Hodge handled it beautifully though, thought he was very classy
I agree, Hodge did handle the situation well, but McAvaney should have never have asked him questions about Sam Mitchell.
ozrulestrace wrote:On a slightly different tack, I thought the way he handled the Sam Mitchell inability to win and therefore his absence was handled so poorly.
Describing the scenario of Mitchell, at that stage, as he discussed the issue with Luke Hodge "as the elephant in the room" was maybe a topic best left unsaid. Hodge looked uncomfortable and wanted to be anywhere else rather answer McAvaney's stupid questions.
The Mitchell family have closer personal issues with the health of their babies, so do you think Sam Mitchell is going to worry about missing out on the Brownlow?
I thought Luke Hodge handled it beautifully though, thought he was very classy
I agree, Hodge did handle the situation well, but McAvaney should have never have asked him questions about Sam Mitchell.
He had to. It was a story. The guy was leading the brownlow but couldnt win it. They couldnt ignore that.
