The location of Seaford

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
goods
Club Player
Posts: 294
Joined: Sun 24 May 2009 7:37pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 27 times

The location of Seaford

Post: # 1146678Post goods »

Population forecasts indicate that, in the next 30 years, Melbourne will grow by 1000,000 people.

Look at the growth areas..

http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html

Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?

Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: The location of Seaford

Post: # 1146693Post Con Gorozidis »

goods wrote:Population forecasts indicate that, in the next 30 years, Melbourne will grow by 1000,000 people.

Look at the growth areas..

http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html

Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?

Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..
im pretty sure they are the stats archie fraser used when making his decision. i dare say it was the major if not only factor in his decision.
probably not a bad thing long term. might have been more pleasant if we took over frankston oval near the beach and town centre. but seaford might end up ok long term.


saintjake
Club Player
Posts: 1511
Joined: Sat 09 Feb 2008 1:49pm
Contact:

Post: # 1146695Post saintjake »

I live in Frankston and since the move to Seaford the growth of young St.kilda supporters is astounding. At both my cousins and Sisters primary school on the "Footy Days" St.kilda is the highest supported team, they might not be members yet but give them some years and they will be.


User avatar
Dis Believer
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5098
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
Has thanked: 289 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Post: # 1146696Post Dis Believer »

The only problem with your logic is that you're not factoring in the discombobulation !!!!

Nuffie.....


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 1146700Post matrix »

i lol'ed


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19161
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Re: The location of Seaford

Post: # 1146702Post SaintPav »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
goods wrote:Population forecasts indicate that, in the next 30 years, Melbourne will grow by 1000,000 people.

Look at the growth areas..

http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html

Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?

Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..
im pretty sure they are the stats archie fraser used when making his decision. i dare say it was the major if not only factor in his decision.
probably not a bad thing long term. might have been more pleasant if we took over frankston oval near the beach and town centre. but seaford might end up ok long term.
Did you see the business case Con?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9154
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Post: # 1146710Post spert »

The purpose of the club being in Seaford is a mystery. If it is just a training/ admin facility, then it could be anywhere, so it might as well be back at Junction Oval which could have easily been brought up to standard, as we are St Kilda after all.. We don't play AFL matches in Seaford, we play them in the city or interstate, and supporters go to Etihad or the MCG to watch the games, otherwise games are watched or listened to on TV, radio or over the internet. I think Seaford is not seen as high profile or funky by advertisers/ sponsors etc. A recent training footage on TV of the team at Seaford a few weeks back showed the players running around against a backdrop of an unattractive concrete factory slab wall smeared with equally unattractive graffiti -not a great look compared to an attractive parkland or city skyline backdrop. I suppose we are stuck with it now.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 1146721Post saintspremiers »

Looking at the map Seaford is not a growth area, as the big empty green wedge still exists in 2030.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19161
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Post: # 1146724Post SaintPav »

saintspremiers wrote:Looking at the map Seaford is not a growth area, as the big empty green wedge still exists in 2030.
Green wedge? :lol:

They are about as useful as a coaches contract with a get out clause... :lol:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3665 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Post: # 1146740Post skeptic »

I don't get the criticism

we have top class facilities for us NOW

after 5 years of negotiating at Moorabbin... we had nothing and would require another 2-3 years of negotiating to get anywhere. I love Moorabbin don't get me wrong... but there are ppl on that council that were just plain opposition to the club.

Everywhere else was at least 5 years away and as far as i know... other than Casey Fields there was no other strong contendor willing to accept the Saints.


What exactly is it that people want here? What are the alernatives?


Mrs_Seaford_Saint
Club Player
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:27pm
Location: Seaford - yes it's the truth

Post: # 1146745Post Mrs_Seaford_Saint »

I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!

And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).

Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.

I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!


User avatar
markp
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 15583
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Post: # 1146747Post markp »

I think it will prove to be a winner as the area develops around it... minor short term pain for long term gain.

A lot of the cats players live in torquay dont they?... I know here I'd be moving if I played for the saints, and I'd love it.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19161
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Post: # 1146748Post SaintPav »

Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!

And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).

Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.

I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
How long does it take to drive from Sandringham to Seaford?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Mrs_Seaford_Saint
Club Player
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:27pm
Location: Seaford - yes it's the truth

Post: # 1146752Post Mrs_Seaford_Saint »

SaintPav wrote:
Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!

And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).

Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.

I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
How long does it take to drive from Sandringham to Seaford?
It takes me 15-20 mins (I'm being generous) to get to Southland so another 5mins on top of that to Sandringham ( going Nepean H'way) - Beach Rd is longer


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Post: # 1146756Post bigred »

skeptic wrote:I don't get the criticism

we have top class facilities for us NOW

after 5 years of negotiating at Moorabbin... we had nothing and would require another 2-3 years of negotiating to get anywhere. I love Moorabbin don't get me wrong... but there are ppl on that council that were just plain opposition to the club.

Everywhere else was at least 5 years away and as far as i know... other than Casey Fields there was no other strong contendor willing to accept the Saints.


What exactly is it that people want here? What are the alernatives?

Yeah these mythical alternatives...

Blah blah blah blah Junction oval.
No hope. Cricket club runs it with an iron fist.

Blah Blah Blah Moorabbin.
No hope, Council pretty much blocked it at every turn. They DID.

Blah Blah Blah Closer to St.Kilda.
Never once heard this touted. Where exactly? Where....? Albert Park?

Nothing wrong with Seaford. I've never even been there. What does it cost us? $1 a year?
Posted elsewhere, the exposure that the saints get in the local community is quite broad. They are all over the local schools and footy clinics. Perhaps, just perhaps there was some forward thinking here.... But that cant be right, it was the current board wasnt it?

Will have sweet bugger all effect on free agency anyway.

Just a bunch of predjudiced clowns who think it is the arse end of the world.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
User avatar
ThePunter
Club Player
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008 12:43pm
Location: Level 2 Half Forward Flank Lockett End
Contact:

Post: # 1146769Post ThePunter »

Seaford is miles away from me ... but I don't mind it. Went down there a couple of months ago for training. It was very cold (but was probably very cold everywhere), but from the "Lunch with Lenny" videos, the interior looks very good.

As for the players having to drive distances ... the new players will probably move into accommodation on the other side of Frankston, which is very nice. Banger's been living down there for years. As long as you are on the other side of the hill, it's a very nice place to live.

And we have a nice little area all to our own. If only we had still managed to keep our zone, and therefore Leigh Matthews, Chris Mew and Dermott Brereton, who are all from near there.


User avatar
barks4eva
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10748
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Post: # 1146795Post barks4eva »

bigred wrote: Blah Blah Blah Closer to St.Kilda.
Never once heard this touted. Where exactly? Where....? Albert Park?


Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!


Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.


Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board

Archie Fraser's came up with the idea of Frankston and Casey

Buttersss wanted none of it

Then when Archie helped organise the coup, the new board agreed to Fraser's proposal

HUGE MISTAKE

Butterss should have been given at least one more year

This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!



You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1146800Post degruch »

barks4eva wrote:This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!

You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!
Cool...closer to me then!


User avatar
HSVKing
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5556
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 5:18pm
Location: Mornington

Post: # 1146815Post HSVKing »

barks4eva wrote:Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!


Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.


Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board
Would love to know where the available land is to do something like we have now, without sending the club broke (cost of land b4e, it's not free!)

Junction Oval is listed with Parks Victoria, no way would they let any development happen there.

Moorabbin was the spot, but Kingston Council are a pack of flogs.


They walk amongst us...

Image
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9154
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 438 times

Post: # 1146821Post spert »

barks4eva wrote:
bigred wrote: Blah Blah Blah Closer to St.Kilda.
Never once heard this touted. Where exactly? Where....? Albert Park?


Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!


Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.


Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board

Archie Fraser's came up with the idea of Frankston and Casey

Buttersss wanted none of it

Then when Archie helped organise the coup, the new board agreed to Fraser's proposal

HUGE MISTAKE

Butterss should have been given at least one more year

This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!



You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!
Butterss might have succeeded in getting us new digs closer to town had the Westaway crowd not did their coup..but it's all history.


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Post: # 1146851Post Enrico_Misso »

spert wrote:Butterss might have succeeded in getting us new digs closer to town had the Westaway crowd not did their coup..but it's all history.
Unfortunately true.

Well if Seaford ever becomes glamorous we have some prime realestate :roll:


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17053
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3665 times
Been thanked: 2927 times

Post: # 1146876Post skeptic »

barks4eva wrote:
Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!


Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.


Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board

Archie Fraser's came up with the idea of Frankston and Casey

Buttersss wanted none of it

Then when Archie helped organise the coup, the new board agreed to Fraser's proposal

HUGE MISTAKE

Butterss should have been given at least one more year

This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!



You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!
What a great way of saying something without actually saying anything at all

maybe if we'd been patient for another 10 years we may have got somewhere... happy with that


hypothetical... lets just say that the Port Phillip after negotiation weren't viable... what's the next step


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 1146882Post saintspremiers »

Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!

And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).

Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.

I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
Why would anyone who owned/owns in Sandy and moves to Seaford is beyond me.

All the suburbs along the coast to Frangga are fine, but surely 99% of people would prefer Sandy, unless of course you wanted a house twice the size/better than what you had in Sandy....


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 1146885Post fingers »

I'm not sure we had anything to do with the "location of seaford". I think it's pretty much been where it is now.


Mrs_Seaford_Saint
Club Player
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:27pm
Location: Seaford - yes it's the truth

Post: # 1146903Post Mrs_Seaford_Saint »

saintspremiers wrote:
Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!

And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).

Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.

I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
Why would anyone who owned/owns in Sandy and moves to Seaford is beyond me.

All the suburbs along the coast to Frangga are fine, but surely 99% of people would prefer Sandy, unless of course you wanted a house twice the size/better than what you had in Sandy....
Of course we would but we didn't have 1.5mil to sink into a family home ( we lived in an apartment a block form the beach) so we decided after looking the whole way down the bay that Seaford was a good financial decision for the future, as it was highly appealing because it hadn't boomed and was so close to the water.

This is the last I will say on it but most people who are moving here are young families who have professional jobs - it's not what it used to be - I just hope Frankston hurry up with the planed marina!


Post Reply