The location of Seaford
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Sun 24 May 2009 7:37pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
The location of Seaford
Population forecasts indicate that, in the next 30 years, Melbourne will grow by 1000,000 people.
Look at the growth areas..
http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html
Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?
Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..
Look at the growth areas..
http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html
Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?
Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: The location of Seaford
im pretty sure they are the stats archie fraser used when making his decision. i dare say it was the major if not only factor in his decision.goods wrote:Population forecasts indicate that, in the next 30 years, Melbourne will grow by 1000,000 people.
Look at the growth areas..
http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html
Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?
Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..
probably not a bad thing long term. might have been more pleasant if we took over frankston oval near the beach and town centre. but seaford might end up ok long term.
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5098
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 289 times
- Been thanked: 281 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: The location of Seaford
Did you see the business case Con?Con Gorozidis wrote:im pretty sure they are the stats archie fraser used when making his decision. i dare say it was the major if not only factor in his decision.goods wrote:Population forecasts indicate that, in the next 30 years, Melbourne will grow by 1000,000 people.
Look at the growth areas..
http://www.nre.vic.gov.au/melbourne2030 ... 03_01.html
Is Frankston Seaford such a bad idea for our future?
Don't get me wrong I would love it at junction oval as I live in Prahran but im thinking future here.. new members new supporter base..
probably not a bad thing long term. might have been more pleasant if we took over frankston oval near the beach and town centre. but seaford might end up ok long term.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9154
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
The purpose of the club being in Seaford is a mystery. If it is just a training/ admin facility, then it could be anywhere, so it might as well be back at Junction Oval which could have easily been brought up to standard, as we are St Kilda after all.. We don't play AFL matches in Seaford, we play them in the city or interstate, and supporters go to Etihad or the MCG to watch the games, otherwise games are watched or listened to on TV, radio or over the internet. I think Seaford is not seen as high profile or funky by advertisers/ sponsors etc. A recent training footage on TV of the team at Seaford a few weeks back showed the players running around against a backdrop of an unattractive concrete factory slab wall smeared with equally unattractive graffiti -not a great look compared to an attractive parkland or city skyline backdrop. I suppose we are stuck with it now.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3665 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
I don't get the criticism
we have top class facilities for us NOW
after 5 years of negotiating at Moorabbin... we had nothing and would require another 2-3 years of negotiating to get anywhere. I love Moorabbin don't get me wrong... but there are ppl on that council that were just plain opposition to the club.
Everywhere else was at least 5 years away and as far as i know... other than Casey Fields there was no other strong contendor willing to accept the Saints.
What exactly is it that people want here? What are the alernatives?
we have top class facilities for us NOW
after 5 years of negotiating at Moorabbin... we had nothing and would require another 2-3 years of negotiating to get anywhere. I love Moorabbin don't get me wrong... but there are ppl on that council that were just plain opposition to the club.
Everywhere else was at least 5 years away and as far as i know... other than Casey Fields there was no other strong contendor willing to accept the Saints.
What exactly is it that people want here? What are the alernatives?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:27pm
- Location: Seaford - yes it's the truth
I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!
And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).
Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.
I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).
Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.
I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
How long does it take to drive from Sandringham to Seaford?Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!
And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).
Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.
I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:27pm
- Location: Seaford - yes it's the truth
It takes me 15-20 mins (I'm being generous) to get to Southland so another 5mins on top of that to Sandringham ( going Nepean H'way) - Beach Rd is longerSaintPav wrote:How long does it take to drive from Sandringham to Seaford?Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!
And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).
Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.
I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
skeptic wrote:I don't get the criticism
we have top class facilities for us NOW
after 5 years of negotiating at Moorabbin... we had nothing and would require another 2-3 years of negotiating to get anywhere. I love Moorabbin don't get me wrong... but there are ppl on that council that were just plain opposition to the club.
Everywhere else was at least 5 years away and as far as i know... other than Casey Fields there was no other strong contendor willing to accept the Saints.
What exactly is it that people want here? What are the alernatives?
Yeah these mythical alternatives...
Blah blah blah blah Junction oval.
No hope. Cricket club runs it with an iron fist.
Blah Blah Blah Moorabbin.
No hope, Council pretty much blocked it at every turn. They DID.
Blah Blah Blah Closer to St.Kilda.
Never once heard this touted. Where exactly? Where....? Albert Park?
Nothing wrong with Seaford. I've never even been there. What does it cost us? $1 a year?
Posted elsewhere, the exposure that the saints get in the local community is quite broad. They are all over the local schools and footy clinics. Perhaps, just perhaps there was some forward thinking here.... But that cant be right, it was the current board wasnt it?
Will have sweet bugger all effect on free agency anyway.
Just a bunch of predjudiced clowns who think it is the arse end of the world.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
- ThePunter
- Club Player
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008 12:43pm
- Location: Level 2 Half Forward Flank Lockett End
- Contact:
Seaford is miles away from me ... but I don't mind it. Went down there a couple of months ago for training. It was very cold (but was probably very cold everywhere), but from the "Lunch with Lenny" videos, the interior looks very good.
As for the players having to drive distances ... the new players will probably move into accommodation on the other side of Frankston, which is very nice. Banger's been living down there for years. As long as you are on the other side of the hill, it's a very nice place to live.
And we have a nice little area all to our own. If only we had still managed to keep our zone, and therefore Leigh Matthews, Chris Mew and Dermott Brereton, who are all from near there.
As for the players having to drive distances ... the new players will probably move into accommodation on the other side of Frankston, which is very nice. Banger's been living down there for years. As long as you are on the other side of the hill, it's a very nice place to live.
And we have a nice little area all to our own. If only we had still managed to keep our zone, and therefore Leigh Matthews, Chris Mew and Dermott Brereton, who are all from near there.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
bigred wrote: Blah Blah Blah Closer to St.Kilda.
Never once heard this touted. Where exactly? Where....? Albert Park?
Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!
Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.
Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board
Archie Fraser's came up with the idea of Frankston and Casey
Buttersss wanted none of it
Then when Archie helped organise the coup, the new board agreed to Fraser's proposal
HUGE MISTAKE
Butterss should have been given at least one more year
This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!
You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!
Would love to know where the available land is to do something like we have now, without sending the club broke (cost of land b4e, it's not free!)barks4eva wrote:Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!
Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.
Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board
Junction Oval is listed with Parks Victoria, no way would they let any development happen there.
Moorabbin was the spot, but Kingston Council are a pack of flogs.
They walk amongst us...
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9154
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
Butterss might have succeeded in getting us new digs closer to town had the Westaway crowd not did their coup..but it's all history.barks4eva wrote:bigred wrote: Blah Blah Blah Closer to St.Kilda.
Never once heard this touted. Where exactly? Where....? Albert Park?
Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!
Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.
Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board
Archie Fraser's came up with the idea of Frankston and Casey
Buttersss wanted none of it
Then when Archie helped organise the coup, the new board agreed to Fraser's proposal
HUGE MISTAKE
Butterss should have been given at least one more year
This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!
You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Unfortunately true.spert wrote:Butterss might have succeeded in getting us new digs closer to town had the Westaway crowd not did their coup..but it's all history.
Well if Seaford ever becomes glamorous we have some prime realestate
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3665 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
What a great way of saying something without actually saying anything at allbarks4eva wrote:
Butterrss admin put a proposal to Port Melbourne but they rejected it!
Butterss was having meetings with the Port Phillip Council and was attempting to locate the club in St kilda or as close to it as possible.
Optons were being explored by Butterss and the previous board
Archie Fraser's came up with the idea of Frankston and Casey
Buttersss wanted none of it
Then when Archie helped organise the coup, the new board agreed to Fraser's proposal
HUGE MISTAKE
Butterss should have been given at least one more year
This one decision will eventually turn us into the next Port Adelaide!
You have been warned.... might not happen overnight, but it will happen!
maybe if we'd been patient for another 10 years we may have got somewhere... happy with that
hypothetical... lets just say that the Port Phillip after negotiation weren't viable... what's the next step
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Why would anyone who owned/owns in Sandy and moves to Seaford is beyond me.Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!
And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).
Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.
I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
All the suburbs along the coast to Frangga are fine, but surely 99% of people would prefer Sandy, unless of course you wanted a house twice the size/better than what you had in Sandy....
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Wed 14 Sep 2011 7:27pm
- Location: Seaford - yes it's the truth
Of course we would but we didn't have 1.5mil to sink into a family home ( we lived in an apartment a block form the beach) so we decided after looking the whole way down the bay that Seaford was a good financial decision for the future, as it was highly appealing because it hadn't boomed and was so close to the water.saintspremiers wrote:Why would anyone who owned/owns in Sandy and moves to Seaford is beyond me.Mrs_Seaford_Saint wrote:I'll say it once and i'll say it again in 10-15 years that will be prime land - the haters will laugh but if you look at all the area's on the bay they are all million dollars suburbs ( besides Seaford) - Foward thinking people!
And most of the suburbs to hit a million now were un-desirable 10 years ago - why do you think we moved here from Sandringham ( where we owned).
Stop whinging and bitching and accept it for what it is as you aren't going to change it.
I just hope our punt pay's off and I can stick it up all the haters in 10 years!
All the suburbs along the coast to Frangga are fine, but surely 99% of people would prefer Sandy, unless of course you wanted a house twice the size/better than what you had in Sandy....
This is the last I will say on it but most people who are moving here are young families who have professional jobs - it's not what it used to be - I just hope Frankston hurry up with the planed marina!