Keep or Trade?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Munga
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Keep or Trade?
http://rateyourlist.afl.com.au/st-kilda/
I see minimum changes. We've already delisted/retired three from the main list. Take four in the draft, one in PSD. So I put down two trades.
Then I remembered the rookies. I wouldn't have a clue about them, although Walsh should get elevated.
So my theory is what value we could get for a player compared to their actual output on (and off) the field. It's sad at this time of year thinking of them as cattle, but here goes:
Dawson. Might get something good for him. Not the best full back going around, and not the smartest off field. Yet might be wanted enough somewhere.
Armo. Tough one. He could yet go to the next level, but we could be waiting forever. Many kids coming up, they might shoot straight past him. Might get something decent for him.
They were my top two. Cahill and Heyne I'm not sure about, but will they have any impact in the senior team?
There's really no need to trade/delist any more than that. There's no point taking kids in the draft post pick 100.
Have a crack.
I see minimum changes. We've already delisted/retired three from the main list. Take four in the draft, one in PSD. So I put down two trades.
Then I remembered the rookies. I wouldn't have a clue about them, although Walsh should get elevated.
So my theory is what value we could get for a player compared to their actual output on (and off) the field. It's sad at this time of year thinking of them as cattle, but here goes:
Dawson. Might get something good for him. Not the best full back going around, and not the smartest off field. Yet might be wanted enough somewhere.
Armo. Tough one. He could yet go to the next level, but we could be waiting forever. Many kids coming up, they might shoot straight past him. Might get something decent for him.
They were my top two. Cahill and Heyne I'm not sure about, but will they have any impact in the senior team?
There's really no need to trade/delist any more than that. There's no point taking kids in the draft post pick 100.
Have a crack.
Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2011 1:31pm
can't see us trading Dawson. He's underrated on this site. A more than capable fullback, and more importantly, by far the best we have. He's also still young enough to be part of the future.
Ray and Jones we can afford to lose, but we wouldn't get a whole lot for them. They could be used as the cherry in a trade though i guess.
Gilbert i'm not sure about, i think he's young enough to be part of the next challenge and is of AA quality when he's up. Not sure we'd get enough for him to make it worth it. I'd like to see him stay.
It all depends if we get a Malthouse, Williams, Eade, Laidley, type who wants another shot with this group or we go for someone who is willing to go the full rebuild, in which case trading an A grader might be essential.
Ray and Jones we can afford to lose, but we wouldn't get a whole lot for them. They could be used as the cherry in a trade though i guess.
Gilbert i'm not sure about, i think he's young enough to be part of the next challenge and is of AA quality when he's up. Not sure we'd get enough for him to make it worth it. I'd like to see him stay.
It all depends if we get a Malthouse, Williams, Eade, Laidley, type who wants another shot with this group or we go for someone who is willing to go the full rebuild, in which case trading an A grader might be essential.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Gilbert is a tough one. At his best is an extremely effective player and has 5+ years left. On the other hand, he was very ordinary this year and plays a position which we can cover. If he has another season like that he'll lose all value, so if we trade him it has to be now. If we can get a pick in the first 35 for Gram we should take it.
As for delistings, Heyne is absolutely gone and I suspect one of Johnson and Cahill will go. I'd also get rid of Gamble and maybe keep Polo on as backup.
As for delistings, Heyne is absolutely gone and I suspect one of Johnson and Cahill will go. I'd also get rid of Gamble and maybe keep Polo on as backup.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
If a new coach isn't in place Pelchen and Harvs will be calling the shots !!Stillwaiting wrote:Who at the club would make these calls now that Lyin is gawn. I assume it would be Pelchin, would the new coach be in place in time for the draft?
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 519 times
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
we'll have a new coach and a new gameplan. it's impossible to tell how any of the players will fit when we don't yet know what the coach is going to want from them. pretty tough for harvey and pelchen to make many decisions in the absence of that information.
given that, and seeing as we've already dumped three from the senior list and it's a shallow draft, i don't see the need to get rid of more than another one, two at the outside. i reckon we want exactly three picks in the nd, max of two in the rookie.
the only two close to going for mine would be johnson and archer. neither strike me as quite having the attributes of an afl player - especially their disposal isn't great (from what i've seen). heyne and cahill deserve another chance under a new coach with maybe different opportunities.
i reckon something like:
DELIST: Baker, Gardiner, Johnson, McQualter, Eddy (rookie)
PROMOTE: Walsh
and if you could get a good trade for gilbert then i'd go for it, otherwise keep most of them and next year make sure you find out a lot about all those on the cusp.
given that, and seeing as we've already dumped three from the senior list and it's a shallow draft, i don't see the need to get rid of more than another one, two at the outside. i reckon we want exactly three picks in the nd, max of two in the rookie.
the only two close to going for mine would be johnson and archer. neither strike me as quite having the attributes of an afl player - especially their disposal isn't great (from what i've seen). heyne and cahill deserve another chance under a new coach with maybe different opportunities.
i reckon something like:
DELIST: Baker, Gardiner, Johnson, McQualter, Eddy (rookie)
PROMOTE: Walsh
and if you could get a good trade for gilbert then i'd go for it, otherwise keep most of them and next year make sure you find out a lot about all those on the cusp.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
Why does everyone hate on WillyJ?bergholt wrote:we'll have a new coach and a new gameplan. it's impossible to tell how any of the players will fit when we don't yet know what the coach is going to want from them. pretty tough for harvey and pelchen to make many decisions in the absence of that information.
given that, and seeing as we've already dumped three from the senior list and it's a shallow draft, i don't see the need to get rid of more than another one, two at the outside. i reckon we want exactly three picks in the nd, max of two in the rookie.
the only two close to going for mine would be johnson and archer. neither strike me as quite having the attributes of an afl player - especially their disposal isn't great (from what i've seen). heyne and cahill deserve another chance under a new coach with maybe different opportunities.
i reckon something like:
DELIST: Baker, Gardiner, Johnson, McQualter, Eddy (rookie)
PROMOTE: Walsh
and if you could get a good trade for gilbert then i'd go for it, otherwise keep most of them and next year make sure you find out a lot about all those on the cusp.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13329
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 680 times
- Been thanked: 1966 times
I probably wouldn't take it as much more than a popularity poll.
What's interesting is that Steven is equal 1st with Lenny.
Those +50% for trade are
Clarke (no surpise there)
Dawson (see above)
Gamble ( i agree with this one)
Geary
Heyne
Kosi (just with 51% to trade)
Gaertner
Ofcourse the whipping boys will be in there. Surpised Gilbert and Gram are doing so well with the years they had.
Dempster at 92% is a surprise though, higher than Milne, Roo and Goddard.
What's interesting is that Steven is equal 1st with Lenny.
Those +50% for trade are
Clarke (no surpise there)
Dawson (see above)
Gamble ( i agree with this one)
Geary
Heyne
Kosi (just with 51% to trade)
Gaertner
Ofcourse the whipping boys will be in there. Surpised Gilbert and Gram are doing so well with the years they had.
Dempster at 92% is a surprise though, higher than Milne, Roo and Goddard.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:02pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Why would Heyne and Cahill, two players who have been poor at VFL level stay ahead of two players who have performed well in Johnson and Archer?bergholt wrote:the only two close to going for mine would be johnson and archer. neither strike me as quite having the attributes of an afl player - especially their disposal isn't great (from what i've seen). heyne and cahill deserve another chance under a new coach with maybe different opportunities.
IMO Heyne is a deadset certainty to be delisted. He already has a big enough frame so it's not physical development holding him back, he just isn't an AFL footballer. He wastes the ball as a midfielder and doesn't kick goals as a forward.
- ThePunter
- Club Player
- Posts: 742
- Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008 12:43pm
- Location: Level 2 Half Forward Flank Lockett End
- Contact:
All the talk before RL left was of a large player exodus.
I think it will look something like Baker, Gardiner, Gamble, Heyne, McQualter, Smith & Cahill plus one or two real surprises from the Gram-Polo-Clarke-Blake-Geary group.
Archer will be retained on the rookie list, Walsh will be promoted, and we'll end up having five or six picks in the draft.
I think it will look something like Baker, Gardiner, Gamble, Heyne, McQualter, Smith & Cahill plus one or two real surprises from the Gram-Polo-Clarke-Blake-Geary group.
Archer will be retained on the rookie list, Walsh will be promoted, and we'll end up having five or six picks in the draft.