Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
He should stay on 199 games.
He falls over regularly and is regularly beaten.
There's a reason he hasn't ever received a Brownlow vote despite 199 opportunities (surely that must tell you something!) - the umpires realise it too - he's simply not a great player.
He and Raph should also be 'retired'.
Enrico_Misso wrote:He is a life member of the club.
He is on 199 games.
He is a more than handy defender.
He can fill in as a ruckman.
He is unselfish and hard.
He gets to the right places.
He knows and sticks to the game plan.
He is a loyal and reliable servant of the club.
AND
He is poised to become the first ever 200 game player to NOT win a single career Brownlow vote.
If there is ANY sentiment in footy, Blake must stay and fulfill his destiny.
Forget who was or who maybe was going to GWS, nothing is happening now until we get a new coach, no1 is going nowhere nix nuthin nada. Lyin tried to do a deal with Bakes to GWS before he sacked him, but everyhting else is not even on the table.
He is poised to become the first ever 200 game player to NOT win a single career Brownlow vote.
If there is ANY sentiment in footy, Blake must stay and fulfill his destiny.
Pretty sure that will not be applicable this year, if he doesn't get at least one point for our final Freo game I'd be absolutely amazed.
He is poised to become the first ever 200 game player to NOT win a single career Brownlow vote.
If there is ANY sentiment in footy, Blake must stay and fulfill his destiny.
Pretty sure that will not be applicable this year, if he doesn't get at least one point for our final Freo game I'd be absolutely amazed.
Quite a few people thought he would have got votes against Hawthorn a few years ago, but he didn't.
So we can't rule out the prospect that you'll be absolutely amazed on the night.
He is poised to become the first ever 200 game player to NOT win a single career Brownlow vote.
If there is ANY sentiment in footy, Blake must stay and fulfill his destiny.
Pretty sure that will not be applicable this year, if he doesn't get at least one point for our final Freo game I'd be absolutely amazed.
Quite a few people thought he would have got votes against Hawthorn a few years ago, but he didn't.
So we can't rule out the prospect that you'll be absolutely amazed on the night.
Well, unlike the Hawks game a few years ago, no-one from the opposition will be a threat of stealing points off him!
Silly to think people would rather delist 21 year olds and keep a 31-32 old on the list to just play 200 games or play as back up.
Effectively means we are wasting a spot on the list or a year for a draftee to get experience.
The hole of players of becoming in their prime is lacking.
noob wrote:Silly to think people would rather delist 21 year olds and keep a 31-32 old on the list to just play 200 games or play as back up.
Effectively means we are wasting a spot on the list or a year for a draftee to get experience.
The hole of players of becoming in their prime is lacking.
Would rather keep a 30 year old who still performs in the AFL than a 21 year old who can't hold a senior Sandrigham spot.
Jason Blake is such a fantastic club man, so much respect for him.
My favourite Jason memory was the open training session before the 2009 grand final, all the players came out one by one. When Blakey walked down the race, everyone cheered loudly, humble guy that he is he turned around to see who walked out after him and blushed when he saw it was for him.
I am so happy he is staying, this latest delisting in order to fix the salary cap and pick him up again, sums him up.