Dean Polo
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3665 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
i'm just saying that he has won ppl over despite being quite mediocre and not contributing much but it's been over shadowed by the fact that he has been in a winning team.saintsRrising wrote:Bit harsh....shouldn't he be judged on what he does, rather than just on what the team does?skeptic wrote:
I'll call it now... if he's in the team come finals time - the positive sentiment towards him will change if we crash out
Nobody liked him at the start of the year when we weren't winning and I don't think he has really improved that much
It's like Mini... a lot of ppl jumped on the "What does Mini contribute to the Team and how does he get a game" bandwagon this year.
News flash - he was just as bad last season but no one cared because we were winning.
The moment we stopped winning - his flaws became noticed more and he was out in a flash
Can't agree with the observation that he hasn't improved - clearly he's improved out of sight and his form is followingskeptic wrote:i'm just saying that he has won ppl over despite being quite mediocre and not contributing much but it's been over shadowed by the fact that he has been in a winning team.saintsRrising wrote:Bit harsh....shouldn't he be judged on what he does, rather than just on what the team does?skeptic wrote:
I'll call it now... if he's in the team come finals time - the positive sentiment towards him will change if we crash out
Nobody liked him at the start of the year when we weren't winning and I don't think he has really improved that much
It's like Mini... a lot of ppl jumped on the "What does Mini contribute to the Team and how does he get a game" bandwagon this year.
News flash - he was just as bad last season but no one cared because we were winning.
The moment we stopped winning - his flaws became noticed more and he was out in a flash
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue 21 Dec 2010 3:04pm
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3665 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30098
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1235 times
Not sure I follow your Mini analogy. He had a truly outstanding year and kicked 22 goals in 24 game. With one more game he only kicked 8 goals.skeptic wrote:i'm just saying that he has won ppl over despite being quite mediocre and not contributing much but it's been over shadowed by the fact that he has been in a winning team.saintsRrising wrote:Bit harsh....shouldn't he be judged on what he does, rather than just on what the team does?skeptic wrote:
I'll call it now... if he's in the team come finals time - the positive sentiment towards him will change if we crash out
Nobody liked him at the start of the year when we weren't winning and I don't think he has really improved that much
It's like Mini... a lot of ppl jumped on the "What does Mini contribute to the Team and how does he get a game" bandwagon this year.
News flash - he was just as bad last season but no one cared because we were winning.
The moment we stopped winning - his flaws became noticed more and he was out in a flash
The game changed around Mini and with his lack of pace he was now unable to perform as well his 2009 role.
Wit Polo...again mediocre is IMO harsh and not IMO a true reflection on his year. When he first came in he struggled, but has now settled and become a solid ear contributor.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 17053
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3665 times
- Been thanked: 2927 times
I actually meant Gamble SRS
I think Polo has been quite good... i've somehow managed to go off on a tangent here in that regard
As for Mini... vehemently have to disagree... he was not good. Played maybe 2 good games for the year and was largely ineffective, his opponents were damaging and his out put declined greatly
I think Polo has been quite good... i've somehow managed to go off on a tangent here in that regard
As for Mini... vehemently have to disagree... he was not good. Played maybe 2 good games for the year and was largely ineffective, his opponents were damaging and his out put declined greatly
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
I actually thought Gamble was ok for a few matches but fell away. Polo is an example of Ross getting the best out of talented players who for what ever reason aren't getting the most from their careers. In business workers are more productive when the are given a defined role. Workers are also shown to have a higher level of job satisfaction and are happier at work when given these roles. Ross is just using a franchise system for footballers and that is why he seems to be able to get maximum effect from a list others rubbish. The boss needs to be a highly organised and structured person to keep redefining roles and pushing up expectations, something he obviously does well. Maybe saints footy should be franchised and flogged before Ball and Hudgeton sell more of our IP.
- bozza1980
- Club Player
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
I think your reasoning is solid but I think your argument, combined with the fact that Polo was unwanted by 16 other clubs, backs up the point that it was a clever piece of recruiting.Con Gorozidis wrote: i agree. i cont believe people are trying to claim him as a piece of recruiting genius. he is a very known quantity. he got 3 brownlow votes in his first afl game. hardly a random player.
but agree that he has had his role dumbed down for us and tailored to play within his limits - which is win ball use first option. if u can get loose get loose. thats it.
i think tigers expected him to be an actual genuine midfielder. he was a victim of high expectations. we are playing him with low exectations within his abilities and not asking too much from him. its working well.
tigers needed him to be a star. we need him to be a workhorse. thats the difference. cos he is a workhorse.
Yes, it shouldn't have been a suprise that Polo is proving a solid AFL player, that said, if we hadn't picked him up, he'd be a former AFL player.
Life is very short and there's no time for fussing and fighting my friends.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
THISbozza1980 wrote:I think your reasoning is solid but I think your argument, combined with the fact that Polo was unwanted by 16 other clubs, backs up the point that it was a clever piece of recruiting.Con Gorozidis wrote: i agree. i cont believe people are trying to claim him as a piece of recruiting genius. he is a very known quantity. he got 3 brownlow votes in his first afl game. hardly a random player.
but agree that he has had his role dumbed down for us and tailored to play within his limits - which is win ball use first option. if u can get loose get loose. thats it.
i think tigers expected him to be an actual genuine midfielder. he was a victim of high expectations. we are playing him with low exectations within his abilities and not asking too much from him. its working well.
tigers needed him to be a star. we need him to be a workhorse. thats the difference. cos he is a workhorse.
Yes, it shouldn't have been a suprise that Polo is proving a solid AFL player, that said, if we hadn't picked him up, he'd be a former AFL player.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Fri 29 Apr 2005 12:26pm
- Location: Local Saint Territory
- Contact: