It's settled, we play the Swans in wk 1, but where?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 6:08pm
Yeah agree. If we can win week one then I like our chances against the Cats (if they lose first up) week two. A preliminary final would be great from where we have come. I have a feeling Goddard is gonna light it up come September.Tom_Sainter wrote:I think we will beat Carlton this week, we have the advantage of having something to play for, the blues can't finish higher than 5th.
Friday night: Cats v Hawks MCG
Saturday: Pies v Eagles MCG
Saturday night: Saints v Swans Etihad
Sunday: Blues v Bombers MCG
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Tim Watson and Andy Maher share the award for Flog of the Day.
On SEN this morning they were discussing 3 Melbourne finals as if it is already settled that there will be a final in Sydney!
I wasn't aware the odds for a Carlton win were so short!
On SEN this morning they were discussing 3 Melbourne finals as if it is already settled that there will be a final in Sydney!
I wasn't aware the odds for a Carlton win were so short!
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Heard that.InkerSaint wrote:Tim Watson and Andy Maher share the award for Flog of the Day.
On SEN this morning they were discussing 3 Melbourne finals as if it is already settled that there will be a final in Sydney!
I wasn't aware the odds for a Carlton win were so short!
I know some people will say these things shouldn't upset fans but stuff it - I was really bloody p1ssed off
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Damn right - us fairweather supporters have got to stick togetherDr Spaceman wrote:I know some people will say these things shouldn't upset fans but stuff it - I was really bloody p1ssed off
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Collingwood West Coast will be at either 2.30 or 4.10 start to allow the Eagles to get home Saturday night.
But if we play Sydney at 7.10 or 7.30 it means either Sydney or us has to fly home Sunday not Saturday night.
A fair solution would be a 2.30 start for the Eagles game and maybe a 5.15 start to our game, which means no overlap and an early enough finish for a flight home Saturday night (tight though due to the 11pm curfewin Sydney - easier if the game is in Sydney).
But if we play Sydney at 7.10 or 7.30 it means either Sydney or us has to fly home Sunday not Saturday night.
A fair solution would be a 2.30 start for the Eagles game and maybe a 5.15 start to our game, which means no overlap and an early enough finish for a flight home Saturday night (tight though due to the 11pm curfewin Sydney - easier if the game is in Sydney).
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
they have carried that all day with their Finals day Time link on news headlines- saying the only way the Final will be at Etihad is if the Saints WinDr Spaceman wrote:Heard that.InkerSaint wrote:Tim Watson and Andy Maher share the award for Flog of the Day.
On SEN this morning they were discussing 3 Melbourne finals as if it is already settled that there will be a final in Sydney!
I wasn't aware the odds for a Carlton win were so short!
I know some people will say these things shouldn't upset fans but stuff it - I was really bloody p1ssed off
would it not also be there if the Swans Lose this weekend??
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Location: Mornington Peninsula
- Contact:
From Martin Windsor Black @ footstats
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
For more info www.saints.com.au
The above views are those of the author and not necessarily those of the clubs or the AFL.
The above views are those of the author and not necessarily those of the clubs or the AFL.
That would be hilarious. Toss a coin???Davo027 wrote:From Martin Windsor Black @ footstats
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
you'd hope that the AFL have a plan for this.Old Mate wrote:That would be hilarious. Toss a coin???Davo027 wrote:From Martin Windsor Black @ footstats
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
It also applies to teams outside the 8 with respect to draft pick order.
My guess is that they haven't a plan, and will make it up on the run per normal.
Yep they are a disgrace not having a plan for exactly the same %. Makes sense even though you you wouldnt have a clue if they have a plan or not.saintspremiers wrote:you'd hope that the AFL have a plan for this.Old Mate wrote:That would be hilarious. Toss a coin???Davo027 wrote:From Martin Windsor Black @ footstats
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
It also applies to teams outside the 8 with respect to draft pick order.
My guess is that they haven't a plan, and will make it up on the run per normal.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Fancy you of all people coming out and saying that!plugger66 wrote:Yep they are a disgrace not having a plan for exactly the same %. Makes sense even though you you wouldnt have a clue if they have a plan or not.saintspremiers wrote:you'd hope that the AFL have a plan for this.Old Mate wrote:That would be hilarious. Toss a coin???Davo027 wrote:From Martin Windsor Black @ footstats
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
It also applies to teams outside the 8 with respect to draft pick order.
My guess is that they haven't a plan, and will make it up on the run per normal.
What you think plugger?
Do YOU think they have a plan for it?
I've never heard it being discussed/mentioned ever.
Yes they do have a plan. They toss a coin. It is the only option as silly as it sounds. Actually changed my mind I think it is previous performance against each other.saintspremiers wrote:Fancy you of all people coming out and saying that!plugger66 wrote:Yep they are a disgrace not having a plan for exactly the same %. Makes sense even though you you wouldnt have a clue if they have a plan or not.saintspremiers wrote:you'd hope that the AFL have a plan for this.Old Mate wrote:That would be hilarious. Toss a coin???Davo027 wrote:From Martin Windsor Black @ footstats
If both Sydney and St Kilda won their matches and Sydney were to score 27 more than St Kilda and concede 57 less – thus winning by 84 more points, the AFL would have a dilemma on its hands.
Possible scenario –
Sydney 23.10-148 v Brisbane 7.4-50 – margin 98
St Kilda 19.7-121 v Carlton 16.11-107 – margin 14
The final ladder would look something like
P W L D F A % Pts
St Kilda 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Sydney 22 12 10 1 1926 1718 112.107 50
Both would finish on the same number of points for and against with the same number of wins.
So who finishes 6th and have the "home" final?
Would it be Sydney because they defeated St Kilda at their only meeting this year?
If there was to be a pre-elimination final to decide – where would it be held – and this would push all the finals back one week – and the GF to October 8th?
It also applies to teams outside the 8 with respect to draft pick order.
My guess is that they haven't a plan, and will make it up on the run per normal.
What you think plugger?
Do YOU think they have a plan for it?
I've never heard it being discussed/mentioned ever.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9054
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Fri 31 Jul 2009 6:16pm
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times