MRP - Ziebell, Greenwood, Thomas and ARMO?

saintbrat · Post: # 1127943Post **saintbrat** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 3:55pm

Thomas 2 weeks
Ziebell 3 before % off
Greenwood 1 - not sure if before or after
Armo 1 after bad record taken - missed on who

Goddard Clear

nothing on Dempster.

plugger66 · Post: # 1127945Post **plugger66** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 3:57pm

What did Armo do? Missed that one.

degruch · Post: # 1127947Post **degruch** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 3:58pm

plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.

Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.

plugger66 · Post: # 1127950Post **plugger66** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:00pm

degruch wrote:
plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.
Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.

Yep makes sense. Because Armo is the player you would immediately pick out if you wanted us to lose.

degruch · Post: # 1127951Post **degruch** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:01pm

plugger66 wrote:
degruch wrote:
plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.
Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.
Yep makes sense. Because Armo is the player you would immediately pick out if you wanted us to lose.

Ah, the scream of the reel.

saintspremiers · Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:01pm

plugger66 wrote:
degruch wrote:
plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.
Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.
Yep makes sense. Because Armo is the player you would immediately pick out if you wanted us to lose.

Two words plugger, last one is "off!".

plugger66 · Post: # 1127953Post **plugger66** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:02pm

saintspremiers wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
degruch wrote:
plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.
Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.
Yep makes sense. Because Armo is the player you would immediately pick out if you wanted us to lose.
Two words plugger, last one is "off!".

Jack.

degruch · Post: # 1127955Post **degruch** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:03pm

saintspremiers wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
degruch wrote:
plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.
Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.
Yep makes sense. Because Armo is the player you would immediately pick out if you wanted us to lose.
Two words plugger, last one is "off!".

Log?

C'mon now, I was...joking.

Thinline · Post: # 1127956Post **Thinline** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:04pm

I thought Greenwood would get nil but Ziebell's is on the money.

Who comes in for Armo?

Do we have anyone left?

bergsone · Post: # 1127957Post **bergsone** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:04pm

Any way what did Armo go for? cant recall incident

wolfpup · Post: # 1127958Post **wolfpup** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:04pm

can someone point out what armitage did?????

me confuzzled ....

stkildathunda · Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:05pm

saintbrat wrote:Thomas 2 weeks
Ziebell 3 before % off
Greenwood 1 - not sure if before or after
Armo 1 after bad record taken - missed on who

Goddard Clear

nothing on Dempster.

On Leigh Adams... cant recall incident though.. All our players carry over points was going to bite us in arse at some stage. Better now then in couple weeks

saintbrat · Post: # 1127960Post **saintbrat** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:06pm

saintbrat wrote:Thomas 2 weeks
Ziebell 3 before % off
Greenwood 1 - not sure if before or after
Armo 1 after bad record taken - missed on who

Goddard Clear

nothing on Dempster.

Thomas 2 games rough contact on Ibbotson
N lower 3 games front on to Thomas
greenwood 1 game front on on Armo
Armitage rough contact on Adams
Ziebell 3 games front on Riewoldt
Kennedy cleared on Golby
K Bradely cleared on Obrien
Addison cleared on Smith
Scarlett Contact below tripping level
Goddard Cleared insufficient on Harvey
Martin cleared on B vince

Twitter

desertsaint · Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:07pm

degruch wrote:
plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.
Played too well, and the AFL can't afford to have us win next week.

dale carnegie once wrote a best selling book. i'm not a fan, but it may just help you. not that you want help

saintbrat · Post: # 1127962Post **saintbrat** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:07pm

and I was so hoping Armo would get to the end of the year having played every game

But has played 21 - Good work-- 50th in the first final

F_Q_F · Post: # 1127963Post **F_Q_F** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:08pm

Armo slung him into the ground in a tackle, maybe in the 3rd quarter??. North player was pretty dazed after it but got up. When I saw it I thought he could be in trouble going by past history but was hoping the MRP would miss it:lol:

dragit · Post: # 1127964Post **dragit** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:08pm

Fancy Scarlett getting off.

saintbrat · Post: # 1127965Post **saintbrat** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:09pm

Thinline wrote:I thought Greenwood would get nil but Ziebell's is on the money.

Who comes in for Armo?

Do we have anyone left?

Gamble
Bakes
Tommy

-
Schneids or Milney back up the ground a bit- where they do play anyway..

dragit · Post: # 1127966Post **dragit** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:09pm

Thinline wrote:Who comes in for Armo?

Apparently there is some Irish guy who is fit, can't recall his nameâ€¦

sackers5 · Post: # 1127968Post **sackers5** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:10pm

It was a sling tackle. Called it at the time, adams landed on his head. Much like the Kosi / Duncan incident. But adams wasn't concussed

desertsaint · Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:10pm

walsh comes inand stars - poor armo misses finals again.

stkildathunda · Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:12pm

David Armitage, St Kilda, has been charged with a level one engaging in rough conduct offence against Leigh Adams, North Melbourne, during the second quarter of the Round 23 match between St Kilda and North Melbourne, played at Etihad Stadium on Saturday August 27, 2011.

In summary, due to his carry-over points for a previous offence, his one-game sanction must remain at one game, even with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from North Melbourne, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record. He has 60 demerit points carried over from within the last 12 points, increasing his penalty to 185 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 138.75 points and a one-match sanction.

Eastern · Post: # 1127971Post **Eastern** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:12pm

plugger66 wrote:What did Armo do? Missed that one.

Sling tackle on Adams. City side, 50m line, Coventry End 2nd Q. Adams took a while to get up. Similar to the one that Kosi went for !!

Thinline · Post: # 1127973Post **Thinline** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:13pm

dragit wrote:
Thinline wrote:Who comes in for Armo?
Apparently there is some Irish guy who is fit, can't recall his nameâ€¦

How's the worm taste ?

joffaboy · Post: # 1127974Post **joffaboy** » Mon 29 Aug 2011 4:13pm

sackers5 wrote:It was a sling tackle. Called it at the time, adams landed on his head. Much like the Kosi / Duncan incident. But adams wasn't concussed

Yup - in light of the sling tackle crackdown one is reasonable.

Thomas should have got at least three.

Ziebel 3 is reasonable.

Harvey should have got ten for bringing the game into disrepute

MRP - Ziebell, Greenwood, Thomas and ARMO?

MRP - Ziebell, Greenwood, Thomas and ARMO?

Re: MRP - Ziebell, Greenwood, Thomas and ARMO?

Re: MRP - Ziebell, Greenwood, Thomas and ARMO?