So who is sitting where?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
Zac Attack
- Club Player
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue 05 Jul 2011 11:56pm
-
Zac Attack
- Club Player
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue 05 Jul 2011 11:56pm
-
Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
I know you have stated before that you can't be arsed reading the history of a thread you are posting in.plugger66 wrote:Is there a problem with that. I would hope most people on here or anywhere could have a drink with each other.Saints43 wrote:Maybe they have a drink before the game with a moderator... it's happened before.saint66au wrote:the baiters, stirrers and bullies are allowed free reign it seems
Even though you don't seem time poor.
But, I will go to the effort fot you.
An ex-moderator is complaining that the "baiters, stirrers and bullies are allowed free reign ".
The point being made is that "baiters, stirrers and bullies" were once allowed free reign by the same ex-moderator because they used to have a beer before a game with them.
I read it all but still dont see your point. As I said we can surely have a beer together. Maybe you have a strange job and dont have a drink with your bosses but I have had many in my life time but they still are the boss and if I stuff up I cop it. Strange.Saints43 wrote:I know you have stated before that you can't be arsed reading the history of a thread you are posting in.plugger66 wrote:Is there a problem with that. I would hope most people on here or anywhere could have a drink with each other.Saints43 wrote:Maybe they have a drink before the game with a moderator... it's happened before.saint66au wrote:the baiters, stirrers and bullies are allowed free reign it seems
Even though you don't seem time poor.
But, I will go to the effort fot you.
An ex-moderator is complaining that the "baiters, stirrers and bullies are allowed free reign ".
The point being made is that "baiters, stirrers and bullies" were once allowed free reign by the same ex-moderator because they used to have a beer before a game with them.
-
Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
The point is that you shouldn't get a pay rise because you drink with your boss and others don't.plugger66 wrote:I read it all but still dont see your point. As I said we can surely have a beer together. Maybe you have a strange job and dont have a drink with your bosses but I have had many in my life time but they still are the boss and if I stuff up I cop it. Strange.
You shouldn't get away with doing fewer hours than others because you drink with your boss.
Anyone in authority (even virtual who cares internet authority) shouldn't play favorites because they have a beer with someone.
Is that fact or just your opinion? The last paragraph i mean.Saints43 wrote:The point is that you shouldn't get a pay rise because you drink with your boss and others don't.plugger66 wrote:I read it all but still dont see your point. As I said we can surely have a beer together. Maybe you have a strange job and dont have a drink with your bosses but I have had many in my life time but they still are the boss and if I stuff up I cop it. Strange.
You shouldn't get away with doing fewer hours than others because you drink with your boss.
Anyone in authority (even virtual who cares internet authority) shouldn't play favorites because they have a beer with someone.
-
Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
You seem to be struggling here.plugger66 wrote:Is that fact or just your opinion? The last paragraph i mean.
I was discussing whether people should be extended favours because they are social acquaintances.
You said that everyone should be able to have a beer together.
No-one is arguing that.
You really are one of lifes time wasters.
Which is why I assume you don't have any of the many bosses you've had before.
Are you on drugs? I will take it you arent. I was asking you if it was fact that these posters got favours because they had a drink with a mod or if it was your opinion. Wouldnt have thought it was a hard question and certainly didnt deserve that response. Thought it was a simple question for obviously a simple person. What a wonderful person you come across as. I can see why you never had a drink with anyone.Saints43 wrote:You seem to be struggling here.plugger66 wrote:Is that fact or just your opinion? The last paragraph i mean.
I was discussing whether people should be extended favours because they are social acquaintances.
You said that everyone should be able to have a beer together.
No-one is arguing that.
You really are one of lifes time wasters.
Which is why I assume you don't have any of the many bosses you've had before.
And what that last line means is beyond me.
-
Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Then just ask it, dopey...plugger66 wrote:I was asking you if it was fact that these posters got favours because they had a drink with a mod or if it was your opinion.
It is pretty clear that it is my opionion when I reply to the ex-moderator with the following:
And I'm yet to meet anyone who has opinions that they don't believe to be based on fact.Saints43 wrote:Maybe they have a drink before the game with a moderator... it's happened before.
Let me know if you need any mail read to you.
As I said no wonder they wouldnt drink with you. Well as I said who cares if they drank with each other because my opinion is they were still treated the same. Luckily I have a different opinion to you because yours is f***ed.Saints43 wrote:Then just ask it, dopey...plugger66 wrote:I was asking you if it was fact that these posters got favours because they had a drink with a mod or if it was your opinion.
It is pretty clear that it is my opionion when I reply to the ex-moderator with the following:
And I'm yet to meet anyone who has opinions that they don't believe to be based on fact.Saints43 wrote:Maybe they have a drink before the game with a moderator... it's happened before.
Let me know if you need any mail read to you.
-
Zac Attack
- Club Player
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue 05 Jul 2011 11:56pm
And again. Thank you.Saints43 wrote:I know you have stated before that you can't be arsed reading the history of a thread you are posting in.plugger66 wrote:Is there a problem with that. I would hope most people on here or anywhere could have a drink with each other.Saints43 wrote:Maybe they have a drink before the game with a moderator... it's happened before.saint66au wrote:the baiters, stirrers and bullies are allowed free reign it seems
Even though you don't seem time poor.
But, I will go to the effort fot you.
An ex-moderator is complaining that the "baiters, stirrers and bullies are allowed free reign ".
The point being made is that "baiters, stirrers and bullies" were once allowed free reign by the same ex-moderator because they used to have a beer before a game with them.
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
-
thejiggingsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9373
- Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
- Has thanked: 662 times
- Been thanked: 498 times
( God help me)