Kosi 2 weeks

bangerisking · Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:48pm

Kosi 2 weeks for sling what a joke, stokes 1 for the punch in the nakkers

SainterK · Post: # 1093096Post **SainterK** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:51pm

Honestly Saints should challenge.

As Bernard pointed out on another thread, Kosi actually ensures his body takes the majority of the impact.

Buddy is being criticised for opting to bump and not tackle, now guys are being rubbed out for opting to tackle?

If you're quite tall, what exactly are you allowed to do?

LENNY LEADS THE WAY · Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:52pm

Was a perfect tackle.

What's next you tackle a player he twists his knee does his acl and you get weeks FFS

Solar · Post: # 1093100Post **Solar** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:54pm

Joke, Im over it.

Perfect tackle thrown onto his side (shoulder).

So you get more weeks for doing the team thing but only one for punching players either in their groin or in their head.

The AFL can go screw themselves. I can't be stuffed caring anymore.

Sobraz · Post: # 1093101Post **Sobraz** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:55pm

Duncan had the ball in his hands...

Very different to the Trengove tackle, where the ball had spilled out and was not in the contest, when Trengove went through with it..

Although 3 weeks at the time still is a disgarceful decision...

Must contest this result...

saintbrat · Post: # 1093102Post **saintbrat** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:55pm

%^&*%^&%

meher baba · Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:56pm

Oh no, you've got to be joking.!!

PakenhamSaint · Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:58pm

Not suprised one bit. Should challenge it though.

Solar · Post: # 1093107Post **Solar** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 6:59pm

LENNY LEADS THE WAY wrote:Was a perfect tackle.

What's next you tackle a player he twists his knee does his acl and you get weeks FFS

Agreed.... next time selwood gets tackled high the tackler gets weeks?

What about a push against a forward which causes a injury?

Watched it again, what could kosi have done better?

I'm not teaching my nephew to play footy because I have no idea what a good tackle is? Would not be fair on him. These days you tackle and almost cross your fingers.

Joke, serious joke.

SainterK · Post: # 1093109Post **SainterK** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:00pm

So....Buddy penalised for opting to bump instead of tackle, yet multiple players are getting rubbed out for opting to tackle, and not bump?

Junction Oval · Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:01pm

Yes, worth the challenge. The degree of impact/injury will be the problem.

Footy is getting closer to Netball.

saintbrat · Post: # 1093111Post **saintbrat** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:01pm

Jack should have staggered more....

atleast stokes got one for the whack on kosi.

plugger66 · Post: # 1093112Post **plugger66** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:01pm

No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.

Mr Magic · Post: # 1093113Post **Mr Magic** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:01pm

What did Joel Corey get for his similar tackle on Jack Steven?
And Mumford's tackle on the Carlton bloke?

SainterK · Post: # 1093114Post **SainterK** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:01pm

plugger66 wrote:No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.

Will he get more if he tries?

saintspremiers · Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:02pm

Sounds spot on to me.

High contact, reckless and low impact = 1 week but with priors goes to 2.

Can someone please post details? I can't find them.

saintbrat · Post: # 1093116Post **saintbrat** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:03pm

Mr Magic wrote:What did Joel Corey get for his similar tackle on Jack Steven?
And Mumford's tackle on the Carlton bloke?

Coery NOTHINGGGGGG a reprimand

AFL_PKeane Patrick Keane
J Corey can accept reprimand, rough conduct J Steven

.
Jack should a have staggered.....

Mumford 2 weeks also

S Mumford, poor record, can accept 2 matches rough conduct D Ellard. M Stokes can accept 1 match, striking J Koschitzke.

plugger66 · Post: # 1093117Post **plugger66** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:03pm

SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.
Will he get more if he tries?

Dont know but if he doesnt that would be the only reason to challenge. And to those who say taking this type of tackle out makes footy weak I suggest you talk to the guys that are slammed into the ground. Jack was very lucky he was badly hurt in his tackle.

saintbrat · Post: # 1093118Post **saintbrat** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:05pm

plugger66 wrote:
SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.
Will he get more if he tries?
Dont know but if he doesnt that would be the only reason to challenge. And to those who say taking this type of tackle out makes footy weak I suggest you talk to the guys that are slammed into the ground. Jack was very lucky he was ? badly hurt in his tackle.

Solar · Post: # 1093119Post **Solar** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:05pm

plugger66 wrote:No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.

Interested in what is a legal tackle these days?

saintspremiers · Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:05pm

Solar wrote:Joke, Im over it.

Perfect tackle thrown onto his side (shoulder).

So you get more weeks for doing the team thing but only one for punching players either in their groin or in their head.

The AFL can go screw themselves. I can't be stuffed caring anymore.

Read the rule book.

It wasn't the perfect tackle.

The player got high contact after he landed. It's illegal.

Get a clue!

plugger66 · Post: # 1093122Post **plugger66** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:06pm

saintbrat wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.
Will he get more if he tries?
Dont know but if he doesnt that would be the only reason to challenge. And to those who say taking this type of tackle out makes footy weak I suggest you talk to the guys that are slammed into the ground. Jack was very lucky he was ? badly hurt in his tackle.

Sorry wasnt badly hurt.

SaintPav · Post: # 1093123Post **SaintPav** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:06pm

plugger66 wrote:
SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:No point in challenging. Will not get off. Just take the 2 weeks which he will do.
Will he get more if he tries?
Dont know but if he doesnt that would be the only reason to challenge. And to those who say taking this type of tackle out makes footy weak I suggest you talk to the guys that are slammed into the ground. Jack was very lucky he was badly hurt in his tackle.

Duncan had possesion of the ball. Next time Kosi should learn to tackle softly.

saintbrat · Post: # 1093124Post **saintbrat** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:07pm

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Kosi :

In summary, due to a previous poor record, his two-game sanction must remain at two games, even with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Geelong Cats, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), medium impact (two points) and high contact (two points). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing poor record of five matches suspended within the last three years, increasing the penalty by 50 per cent to 337.50 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 253.13 points and a two-match sanction.

Josh Hunt, Geelong Cats, has been charged with a Level Two striking offence against Adam Schneider, St Kilda, during the second quarter of the Round 13 match between the Geelong Cats and St Kilda, played at the MCG on Saturday June 18, 2011.

In summary, his previous poor record means that his one-game sanction must remain at one game, even with an early plea.

Joel Corey, Geelong Cats, has been charged with a Level One engaging in rough conduct offence against Jack Steven, St Kilda, during the fourth quarter of the Round 13 match between the Geelong Cats and St Kilda, played at the MCG on Saturday June 18, 2011.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record with an early plea

.

Contact between St Kildaâ€™s Justin Koschitzke and the Geelong Catsâ€™ Cameron Ling from the second quarter of Saturdayâ€™s match was assessed. Ling has the ball and is tackled by Koschitzke and taken to ground. As Ling is going to ground, he makes contact with the legs of St Kilda player Brendon Goddard. It was the view of the panel that the force used in the tackle was not excessive in the circumstances and Ling was not treated for any injury. No further action was taken.

Media should note that all relevant video angles of each incident above, both charges and incidents that were cleared, are available to view on afl.com.au.

dragit · Post: # 1093125Post **dragit** » Mon 20 Jun 2011 7:07pm

Joel Corey - reprimand for a very similar tackle in the same game,
we are seriously cursed at the MRP,
Kosi plays his first decent game this year - poor bloke,
We won't win at the tribunral - we NEVER do
How dissapointing