Rd 13 Team vs Geelong
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9154
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
We are knocking on the door of a final eight berth, so any experienced player who is showing some form, will get a senior gig over inexperienced bodies who are still developing, no matter how promising they may look. Clearly Kosi defies that trend and is so far off form that it aint funny. Geelong's small to middle size players are very strong for their size, so its a no brainer to go with experience (though I thought Walsh might get a look in for size if nothing else) EDIT -I just saw the injury comment about Walsh
Last edited by spert on Thu 16 Jun 2011 7:07pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6612
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
HERE HERE. Show some guts coach. Get rid of the deadwood and play the kids FFS!!AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Fully agree.Sobraz wrote:Obviously not.... Blake/McEvoy ruck has worked well, and Joey is a gun...SainterK wrote:So you'd leave out Joey and Blake if they were available?Sobraz wrote:Not sure what this means??SainterK wrote:I don't mind trying to win this one, before the bye.
Were we not trying to win the last few weeks, or with youngsters (who all did well) in the side??.. 3 out of 4 games, we did actually win??
Looking forward to next week's inclusion of McQualter in the team...
Then it'll be back to round 1, and lets do it all again...
Those inclusions are fine...
But Raph has used up all his credits, and Gamble hasn't earnt any...
How they find themselves ahead of Lynch, Sippos, Johnson, who have the upside to match McEvoy, Steven, Armo, is beyond me...
It was discussed on SEN earlier this week if we did get on a bit of a winning run on the back of a bit of youthful excitment alongside the core, what would Ross do??...
Would he revert to the tried and true, play it conservative, or throw caution to the wind, and back the kids...
Looks like we know the answer...
This time last year, Malthouse dropped Medhurst, Presti, Lockyer etc, and went with some kids... Changed direction...
We're heading back in the direction from where we came...
If Ross thinks were going to win the flag this year with pretty much the "same old same old's", that have failed to get it done in the past two seasons, minus Lenny, he's kidding himself and doing us a disservice.
Malthouse showed real guts last year, picking "kids" ahead of those he knew would probably perform better at the time and was rewarded with a Premiership, after the "kids" got better and better as the year went on. Ross has shown little this year, only picking the "kids" when he had exhausted pretty much every other option and now he leaves them out for those we know aren't going to win us a Premiership.
I probably haven't been this disappointed with our team selection since we played Geelong in round one (with all the old faces that failed last year).
Kids are great, but not just as a general rule.
Don't see why we would retain (Simpkin) or bring in more pure defenders (Lynch) given Mooney and Hawkins remain outs.
I think the likes of Peake, Gram, Joey running forward of the centre, have more chance of ruffling Geelong, than a Siposs or Johnson sitting bored in the F50
Don't see why we would retain (Simpkin) or bring in more pure defenders (Lynch) given Mooney and Hawkins remain outs.
I think the likes of Peake, Gram, Joey running forward of the centre, have more chance of ruffling Geelong, than a Siposs or Johnson sitting bored in the F50
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6612
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
OMG. What's the point of limping into the 8 with that same old team minus Lenny. Surely it's time we found the next Lenny, et al.spert wrote:We are knocking on the door of a final eight berth, so any experienced player who is showing some form, will get a senior gig over inexperienced bodies who are still developing, no matter how promising they may look. Clearly Kosi defies that trend and is so far off form that it aint funny. Geelong's small to middle size players are very strong for their size, so its a no brainer to go with experience (though I thought Walsh might get a look in for size if nothing else) EDIT -I just saw the injury comment about Walsh
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10431
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
bit disappointing - obviously not blake or joey - must ins if fit imo, but we've been winning playing the kids - add that bit of enthusiasm and possibly lift the experienced crew.
raph takes w hile to warm into a game so can't play as sub.
possibly kosi named in case blake doesn't come up.
it will be a bruising affair so i can see why ross might be loath to play the lighter frames, but i'd like to see siposs play - mind you gamble did stick 7tackles last week - something young sippo wouldn't do.
please do not start gilbert forward ross!
raph takes w hile to warm into a game so can't play as sub.
possibly kosi named in case blake doesn't come up.
it will be a bruising affair so i can see why ross might be loath to play the lighter frames, but i'd like to see siposs play - mind you gamble did stick 7tackles last week - something young sippo wouldn't do.
please do not start gilbert forward ross!
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Collingwoods kids all "clicked" together, far more than ours did/have and demanded to be played ahead of Fraser/OBree/Lockyer etcAnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Fully agree.Sobraz wrote:Obviously not.... Blake/McEvoy ruck has worked well, and Joey is a gun...SainterK wrote:So you'd leave out Joey and Blake if they were available?Sobraz wrote:Not sure what this means??SainterK wrote:I don't mind trying to win this one, before the bye.
Were we not trying to win the last few weeks, or with youngsters (who all did well) in the side??.. 3 out of 4 games, we did actually win??
Looking forward to next week's inclusion of McQualter in the team...
Then it'll be back to round 1, and lets do it all again...
Those inclusions are fine...
But Raph has used up all his credits, and Gamble hasn't earnt any...
How they find themselves ahead of Lynch, Sippos, Johnson, who have the upside to match McEvoy, Steven, Armo, is beyond me...
It was discussed on SEN earlier this week if we did get on a bit of a winning run on the back of a bit of youthful excitment alongside the core, what would Ross do??...
Would he revert to the tried and true, play it conservative, or throw caution to the wind, and back the kids...
Looks like we know the answer...
This time last year, Malthouse dropped Medhurst, Presti, Lockyer etc, and went with some kids... Changed direction...
We're heading back in the direction from where we came...
If Ross thinks were going to win the flag this year with pretty much the "same old same old's", that have failed to get it done in the past two seasons, minus Lenny, he's kidding himself and doing us a disservice.
Malthouse showed real guts last year, picking "kids" ahead of those he knew would probably perform better at the time and was rewarded with a Premiership, after the "kids" got better and better as the year went on. Ross has shown little this year, only picking the "kids" when he had exhausted pretty much every other option and now he leaves them out for those we know aren't going to win us a Premiership.
I probably haven't been this disappointed with our team selection since we played Geelong in round one (with all the old faces that failed last year).
If Winmar and Lynch had played the sort of footy Beams and Sidebottom did early on, they'd not be running around for Sandy
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
So what do you think Jack Steven is? and what makes you think we are going to limp into the eight?Jacks Back wrote:OMG. What's the point of limping into the 8 with that same old team minus Lenny. Surely it's time we found the next Lenny, et al.spert wrote:We are knocking on the door of a final eight berth, so any experienced player who is showing some form, will get a senior gig over inexperienced bodies who are still developing, no matter how promising they may look. Clearly Kosi defies that trend and is so far off form that it aint funny. Geelong's small to middle size players are very strong for their size, so its a no brainer to go with experience (though I thought Walsh might get a look in for size if nothing else) EDIT -I just saw the injury comment about Walsh
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Get to the finals (whether we limp in or not) and you never know what can happen. Better than not getting in at all. Finals experience for Steven, McEvoy and Armo would do them good. And come finals, Sippos, Simpkin, Ledger ect may get a game depending on form and injuries. You can't just right the year off when we're one game outside the 8.Jacks Back wrote:OMG. What's the point of limping into the 8 with that same old team minus Lenny. Surely it's time we found the next Lenny, et al.spert wrote:We are knocking on the door of a final eight berth, so any experienced player who is showing some form, will get a senior gig over inexperienced bodies who are still developing, no matter how promising they may look. Clearly Kosi defies that trend and is so far off form that it aint funny. Geelong's small to middle size players are very strong for their size, so its a no brainer to go with experience (though I thought Walsh might get a look in for size if nothing else) EDIT -I just saw the injury comment about Walsh
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6612
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Jack Steven is A GUN and already winning our clearances but is in his 3rd year I think. You've got to persist with anyone that shows glimpses of greatness. Who would of thought that Jack would be so good in the centre until he was tried there? It looked, to me at least, he would only be a small forward that would take over from Milney but he's proof of persistence. JACKS BACK!!SaintPav wrote:So what do you think Jack Steven is? and what makes you think we are going to limp into the eight?Jacks Back wrote:OMG. What's the point of limping into the 8 with that same old team minus Lenny. Surely it's time we found the next Lenny, et al.spert wrote:We are knocking on the door of a final eight berth, so any experienced player who is showing some form, will get a senior gig over inexperienced bodies who are still developing, no matter how promising they may look. Clearly Kosi defies that trend and is so far off form that it aint funny. Geelong's small to middle size players are very strong for their size, so its a no brainer to go with experience (though I thought Walsh might get a look in for size if nothing else) EDIT -I just saw the injury comment about Walsh
As far as STORMING into the 8 I can't see it the way we have been playing.
Last edited by Jacks Back on Thu 16 Jun 2011 7:20pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Armoooo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7281
- Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
- Location: The Great South East
- Contact:
I'm fine with this, for the next 6-8 weeks keep playing for the finals. If we reach the stage where Ross doesn't think we will make the finals then cut the dead wood and only play kids.
However at about round 20 I think Ross needs to make a far more difficult decision, can we make an impact in the finals? if he thinks we can come 5th or 6th and really give the finals a good shake then he should continue to play our best team every week.
If he thinks that we will only be there to make the numbers, or might not make it at all then he should send all the players to get their end of season clean up operations early. Every key player can wrap up the season early and give the youngsters a chance to show what they're made of.
Can you imagine the incentive for a young team with 6-7 really young players playing off for a finals berth? the last four games would all be like a final to those kids, and if they actually managed to make it to the finals the experience would be incredibly valuable.
IMO we have no chance of winning the flag this year and a less than 5% chance of making a prelim, so I would like to see us send the players off early and start the pre-season early. 2012 is just about our last tilt at the flag.
However at about round 20 I think Ross needs to make a far more difficult decision, can we make an impact in the finals? if he thinks we can come 5th or 6th and really give the finals a good shake then he should continue to play our best team every week.
If he thinks that we will only be there to make the numbers, or might not make it at all then he should send all the players to get their end of season clean up operations early. Every key player can wrap up the season early and give the youngsters a chance to show what they're made of.
Can you imagine the incentive for a young team with 6-7 really young players playing off for a finals berth? the last four games would all be like a final to those kids, and if they actually managed to make it to the finals the experience would be incredibly valuable.
IMO we have no chance of winning the flag this year and a less than 5% chance of making a prelim, so I would like to see us send the players off early and start the pre-season early. 2012 is just about our last tilt at the flag.
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
How "burnt out" do you think Lynch got from his one game a few weeks ago? A game where he did well and gave us another genuine lead-up forward option, something that we've been sorely lacking? And he's hardly a "skinny kid" that we have to protect from the big bad Cats!Megsie wrote:Glad our KIDS are not being " burnt out " !!
They have such bright furtures ahead of them. Hopefully they
are being monitored & now is NOT the time to get their bodies
& minds smashed by the cats.
How the hell can it be that we aren't able to squeeze someone that's had 33 and 35 possession games (with apparently 13 and 15 marks in those games), plus other good games, in the VFL this season, into our team?
Collingwood and Geelong manage to fit those who are doing that well in the VFL into their team, yet our 22 (or our 25, as he hasn't even been named emergency!) is too good for someone who is, who can also play at either end?
Extraordinary.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 56 times
Who do you drop for Ledger? Ask yourself that question.
Gamble maybe? But was excellent last week and coming up against his old side who he played well against in Round 1.
Raph? Different sort of player (although personally I think we have one too many half-backs in the team).
Peake? No, been in good form.
Steven? No, been outstanding.
Gram? Was good last week and hardness against the Cats would be preferred.
Before blowing off at the coach with the "youth vs experience" argument, have a good hard look at the side, our opponent and spend 10-15 hours thinking about selection like Ross Lyon would have done this week.
I think they've picked a very good side for Round 9 2011 to beat Geelong at night on the MCG.
Isn't that the aim?
Gamble maybe? But was excellent last week and coming up against his old side who he played well against in Round 1.
Raph? Different sort of player (although personally I think we have one too many half-backs in the team).
Peake? No, been in good form.
Steven? No, been outstanding.
Gram? Was good last week and hardness against the Cats would be preferred.
Before blowing off at the coach with the "youth vs experience" argument, have a good hard look at the side, our opponent and spend 10-15 hours thinking about selection like Ross Lyon would have done this week.
I think they've picked a very good side for Round 9 2011 to beat Geelong at night on the MCG.
Isn't that the aim?
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Depends if you're looking short term or long term. If you reckon we're a genuine contender for the Premiership this year, then sure, otherwise, we'll just make up the numbers and we'll have missed a great opportunity to give some of the younger ones some great experience and hopefully fast track their development, as Collingwood did last year.Legendary wrote:Who do you drop for Ledger? Ask yourself that question.
Gamble maybe? But was excellent last week and coming up against his old side who he played well against in Round 1.
Raph? Different sort of player (although personally I think we have one too many half-backs in the team).
Peake? No, been in good form.
Steven? No, been outstanding.
Gram? Was good last week and hardness against the Cats would be preferred.
Before blowing off at the coach with the "youth vs experience" argument, have a good hard look at the side, our opponent and spend 10-15 hours thinking about selection like Ross Lyon would have done this week.
I think they've picked a very good side for Round 9 2011 to beat Geelong at night on the MCG.
Isn't that the aim?
Collingwood could have just gone and said OK, we'll just pick our best side every week and kept on picking the O'Bree's and Fraser's, but they didn't, even though they almost certainly were still in their best 22, at the time they decided to leave them out.
In the long term, it paid off for them, big-time.
We're so far off being a genuine contender this year it's not funny, but if we keep getting games into the younger ones we'd probably have a much better chance next year.
I'd rather win a Premiership next year than beat Geelong this week and I believe we're a much better chance of that happening if we keep on playing the younger ones who are showing genuinely good signs. But that's just me.
Last edited by AnythingsPossibleSaints on Thu 16 Jun 2011 7:47pm, edited 1 time in total.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
If we were picking our most in form team, we'd have to drop Sam. I really like the kid, pretty much from his first ever game, but he is dreadfully out of form. Based on form, Tom Lynch deserves a gig.Middo wrote:shame he can't get a kick ...SaintSimmo wrote:shame he cant kick straightSaintPav wrote:Gilbert named at CHF.
Maybe Ross got teased as a kid in school by a kid named Tom, we have Simpkin, Walsh, Lynch and Ledger who all are unlucky not to be in the team.
Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
Go those mighty Sainters!!
I have no idea how good you are at footy but kicking that goal should have nothing to do with playing in our side. How could he not kick it?Con Gorozidis wrote:What did the Ledge do wrong?
Oh he kicked a goal. Thats a no-no. Not defensive enough. Bad boy!
Anyway once Blake was fit he obviously comes in for Simkin. Blake can ruck and play back and he also is good at holding onto the ball in the last few seconds against Geelong. Joey had to play so a mid goes out. Not a forward like Gamble or a back like Clake so it gets down to Gram or Ledger. I would go with Gram every day of the week at this stage. Unlike what some think our first and second year players are hardly picking themselves.
Last edited by plugger66 on Thu 16 Jun 2011 8:01pm, edited 1 time in total.
The difference between us and COllingwood is that their best 22 last year contained several kids who were playing compelling enough football to insist they be part of their best side and keep Presti/Lockyer/O'Bree etc in the seconds
...yet here we are saying "rest the kids and play our best 22"
...yet here we are saying "rest the kids and play our best 22"
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
Great inclusions - you get a sense that this game is important if we are to have a crack at the finals this year. Most experienced team in a long while and to honest the experimenting with the kids had to have life expectancy. Good that they've had a crack but I want to see our best team.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6612
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1340 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
I agree with AnythingsPossibleSaints. This year the granny is not possible. Hitherto, why would you not play the players that will win your NEXT grand final? It's the future or bust. The Aussie cricket side is (ever so slightly) starting to drop off players that won't be in their best 11 come the next Ashes.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Depends if you're looking short term or long term. If you reckon we're a genuine contender for the Premiership this year, then sure, otherwise, we'll just make up the numbers and we'll have missed a great opportunity to give some of the younger ones some great experience and hopefully fast track their development, as Collingwood did last year.Legendary wrote:Who do you drop for Ledger? Ask yourself that question.
Gamble maybe? But was excellent last week and coming up against his old side who he played well against in Round 1.
Raph? Different sort of player (although personally I think we have one too many half-backs in the team).
Peake? No, been in good form.
Steven? No, been outstanding.
Gram? Was good last week and hardness against the Cats would be preferred.
Before blowing off at the coach with the "youth vs experience" argument, have a good hard look at the side, our opponent and spend 10-15 hours thinking about selection like Ross Lyon would have done this week.
I think they've picked a very good side for Round 9 2011 to beat Geelong at night on the MCG.
Isn't that the aim?
Collingwood could have just gone and said OK, we'll just pick our best side every week and kept on picking the O'Bree's and Fraser's, but they didn't, even though they almost certainly were still in their best 22, at the time they decided to leave them out.
In the long term, it paid off for them, big-time.
We're so far off being a genuine contender this year it's not funny, but if we keep getting games into the younger ones we'd probably have a much better chance next year.
I'd rather win a Premiership next year than beat Geelong this week and I believe we're a much better chance of that happening if we keep on playing the younger ones who are showing genuinely good signs. But that's just me.
Unless Rossy thinks we can still win it this year. Mmmm