Selwood out vs Saints?

Fidelis · Post: # 1089327Post **Fidelis** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 12:15am

The press is unusually quiet.

But there must be a question mark about Selwood's availability after an alleged off the ball incident with a now injured Guerra.

I'll be watching tomorrow's MRP with interest.

SaintPav · Post: # 1089368Post **SaintPav** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 1:52am

Fidelis wrote:The press is unusually quiet.

But there must be a question mark about Selwood's availability after an alleged off the ball incident with a now injured Guerra.

I'll be watching tomorrow's MRP with interest.

Don't hold your breath.

Armoooo · Post: # 1089371Post **Armoooo** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 1:56am

I would say there is a 90% chance that Selwood will play next week, simply because he's Selwood.

Sainternist · Mon 13 Jun 2011 2:25am

If Selwood gets cleared, it's a joke. At least it will have Jeff Kennett screaming blue murder, which gives us a week's worth of entertainment

Hurricane · Post: # 1089396Post **Hurricane** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 8:02am

I think Johnson might also be in trouble for that little tummy punch. His record isnt that great but that being said both will likley get off.

BANG BANG

Eastern · Post: # 1089418Post **Eastern** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 10:38am

Intentional Cunduct: YES

High Contact: YES

High Impact: YES

I'm buggered if I know how to calculate it but it should equate to 4 weeks. The only thing that will save him is the incompetence of Ch10 in not having any footage of the incident !!

bigcarl · Post: # 1089422Post **bigcarl** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 10:48am

Bakes would be looking down the barrel at 12-weeks for this one.

But, hey, it's Selwood. Special rules for special players. The darling of the umpires who is always being tackled high.

SaintPav · Post: # 1089425Post **SaintPav** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 10:55am

Eastern wrote:Intentional Cunduct: YES

High Contact: YES

High Impact: YES

I'm buggered if I know how to calculate it but it should equate to 4 weeks. The only thing that will save him is the incompetence of Ch10 in not having any footage of the incident !!

Apparently there is some blurry vision.

Wrote for Luck · Mon 13 Jun 2011 10:56am

Was he reported? Did an umpire see it?

Eastern · Post: # 1089429Post **Eastern** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 11:00am

millarsaint wrote:Was he reported? Did an umpire see it?

Wasn't reported on the day. There are reports that an "out of zone" umpire was about 20 metres away !!

degruch · Post: # 1089430Post **degruch** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 11:01am

SaintPav wrote:
Eastern wrote:Intentional Cunduct: YES

High Contact: YES

High Impact: YES

I'm buggered if I know how to calculate it but it should equate to 4 weeks. The only thing that will save him is the incompetence of Ch10 in not having any footage of the incident !!
Apparently there is some blurry vision.

On the OTHER thread about this.

YouTube it.

SaintPav · Post: # 1089445Post **SaintPav** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 11:29am

degruch wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
Eastern wrote:Intentional Cunduct: YES

High Contact: YES

High Impact: YES

I'm buggered if I know how to calculate it but it should equate to 4 weeks. The only thing that will save him is the incompetence of Ch10 in not having any footage of the incident !!
Apparently there is some blurry vision.
On the OTHER thread about this.

YouTube it.

mr six o'clock · Mon 13 Jun 2011 12:28pm

Don't the afl have goal to goal cameras that are supposed to pick up these kind of incidents ?

jays · Post: # 1089476Post **jays** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 12:31pm

he is gawn

Eastern · Post: # 1089492Post **Eastern** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 1:28pm

mr six o'clock wrote:Don't the afl have goal to goal cameras that are supposed to pick up these kind of incidents ?

I think that's the blurry vision on the youtube on the other thread !!

desertsaint · Mon 13 Jun 2011 1:36pm

i think it'll come down to selwood's excuse - if he shuts up and claims ignorance or innocence he'll be fine. will guerra dob?

Dr Spaceman · Mon 13 Jun 2011 2:01pm

desertsaint wrote:i think it'll come down to selwood's excuse - if he shuts up and claims ignorance or innocence he'll be fine. will guerra dob?

Depends. Did his wig come off?

saintjake · Post: # 1089507Post **saintjake** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 2:03pm

Will get off, unless Hawks want justice otherwise players code will see him play

Moods · Post: # 1089516Post **Moods** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 3:10pm

I actually reckon this is the EXACT type of incident that the AFL are trying to stamp out. Blokes taken out miles off the ball. I reckon you will see an AFL investigation if there isn't enough evidence to cite him. Guerra has a bad injury out of it (perforated ear drum) I can't see how the AFL can just accept that this occurred w/o investigating it - whether it's Stephen Baker or Joel Selwood involved. I don't buy into the conspiracy theories. Let's wait and see.

sunsaint · Post: # 1089539Post **sunsaint** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 5:32pm

exactly
If medical reports confirm he has a perforated ear drum, then the MRP will take action and selwood will have a holiday
no conspiracy theories here move on

saintjake · Post: # 1089546Post **saintjake** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 5:51pm

Three weeks

Marcus1232 · Mon 13 Jun 2011 5:57pm

3 weeks dog act

plugger66 · Post: # 1089553Post **plugger66** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 5:59pm

Wrong.

Marcus1232 · Mon 13 Jun 2011 6:04pm

He wont get off the AFL is cracking down on hits behind the play and it was evidence from the Hawthorn Medicos which did selwood in i believe

saintbrat · Post: # 1089559Post **saintbrat** » Mon 13 Jun 2011 6:07pm

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/j ... 6074382895

The final-quarter incident was not captured by Channel 10 cameras but the match review panel today ruled Selwood should sit out three games even if he pleads guilty

.

Selwood out vs Saints?

Selwood out vs Saints?

Re: Selwood out vs Saints?