will daisy get reported

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
markp
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 15583
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Post: # 1086075Post markp »

degruch wrote:
markp wrote:
degruch wrote:
Moccha wrote:
saintbrat wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... 1fngn.html

Nice of the papers to give daisy his alibi.
How do they make this s*** up
One factor in Thomas' favour is that he seemingly made contact with the Saint's mouth with the inside of his wrist rather than his fist, which could prompt the panel to deem it was not a strike.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/t ... z1OSTPSNgR
:lol: That is AWESOME! Knowing the media's influence on the tribunal, Daisy probably won't need a lawyer for this one...or at the very least, call up Barry Hall's old legal defense.
"If the knuckles didn't hit, you must acquit"
I wouldn't put it past Eddie to send in Mohamed Ali as his leagl defense.
I was channeling Johnnie Cochran... but he's not doing much work these days, though neither is Ali, sadly.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Post: # 1086088Post Dr Spaceman »

If Collingwood try to mount a defence that Clint Jones king-hit Daisy Thomas first, it will surely fail.

That’s the problem with being such a high profile club. There is simply too much photographic evidence available, dating back to his junior years, to prove that Daisy’s head has always looked like that :wink:


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1086183Post SainterK »

Got a week, must of been assessed low impact?

So Melbourne face Collingwood without Swan, Thomas and Beams.


User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5535
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 484 times
Contact:

Post: # 1086188Post Life Long Saint »

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points).

He drew 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction that can be reduced to 168.75 points and one game because of his good record.
Low impact??? That must be the Chris Judd conduct classification system. Didn't Jones require treatment after the incident?


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 1086195Post stinger »

Life Long Saint wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points).

He drew 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction that can be reduced to 168.75 points and one game because of his good record.
Low impact??? That must be the Chris Judd conduct classification system. Didn't Jones require treatment after the incident?

yep...bleeding mouth...


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19161
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1609 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Post: # 1086221Post SaintPav »

stinger wrote:
Life Long Saint wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points).

He drew 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction that can be reduced to 168.75 points and one game because of his good record.
Low impact??? That must be the Chris Judd conduct classification system. Didn't Jones require treatment after the incident?

yep...bleeding mouth...
Joke.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
InkerSaint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm

Post: # 1086224Post InkerSaint »

126.56 points if accepted, 168.75 points if challenged and not successful. You'd think they'll challenge and try to get off the charge.


"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Post: # 1086251Post saintbrat »

Life Long Saint wrote:http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points).

He drew 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction that can be reduced to 168.75 points and one game because of his good record.
Low impact??? That must be the Chris Judd conduct classification system. Didn't Jones require treatment after the incident?
Speaking of Judd- He didn't hit the umpire
Contact between Carlton's Chris Judd and an umpire from the third quarter of Sunday's match was assessed. The umpire had bounced the ball and was heading backwards when he deviated away on an angle, rather than move in a direct straight line. Player Judd held his position and it was the view of the panel that the change in path by the umpire had contributed to the contact. No further action was taken.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 1086278Post saintspremiers »

InkerSaint wrote:126.56 points if accepted, 168.75 points if challenged and not successful. You'd think they'll challenge and try to get off the charge.
Yep they will.

And Daisy will get off because he plays for the Pies and is a brownlow favorite.

AND please the MRP and AFL are CORRUPT!

So this is Dimwit's chance to show he is fair. Ie he's on notice.


User avatar
St. Luke
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5268
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!

Post: # 1086300Post St. Luke »

I loved this bit of footage. Surely he can't get off...but then again...it is a goldenchild team of the AFL



When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 1086302Post Solar »

low impact????

HUH?

This is a disgrace....

The AFL can go bite itself..... how a player can belt a opposition player, who then leaves the field with blood and is forced onto the bench for periods of the rest of the game be suggested as LOW IMPACT

Seriously this is becoming a bigger joke by the day


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 1086305Post stinger »

love it.... :wink: :wink: 8-)


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Post: # 1086341Post Con Gorozidis »

this is a complete joke. 1 week.

SEN (Nathan Thompson) just said he was the luckiest player in the AFL.

AFL is so corrupt. Oh Daisy is a "star of the game" and a favourite for kids. So we dont want him missing games.

Same as Judd last year after the Pavlich hit.

Just a joke.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1086343Post plugger66 »

Got 2 weeks. Certainly didnt deserve anymore but as the pies are struggling i cant believe he didnt get off. That side is so poor it needs all the help it can get. It makes sense. As much sense as the hilarious conspiracy theories. It is very funny.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 1086345Post saintspremiers »

Its low impact so at worst Daisy only gets a week.

Don't you guys know the golden rule that players with a 5 year clean record are treated differently to those who don't?

The 5 year clean record gives him a bonus 25% off anyway, so the MRP could gone medium impact which at worst wouldve meant 2 weeks with an early plea. Hardly a harsh penalty.

Did CJ get a free and a 50 metre penalty?


User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Post: # 1086348Post saintbrat »

St. Luke wrote:I loved this bit of footage. Surely he can't get off...but then again...it is a goldenchild team of the AFL

some people obviously have plenty of time- It is good though

posted yesterday I thought then realised it is possible uSA dated.


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 1086349Post saintspremiers »

plugger66 wrote:Got 2 weeks. Certainly didnt deserve anymore but as the pies are struggling i cant believe he didnt get off. That side is so poor it needs all the help it can get. It makes sense. As much sense as the hilarious conspiracy theories. It is very funny.
I love you plugger.

You are wonderful, my hero!


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1086351Post plugger66 »

saintspremiers wrote:Its low impact so at worst Daisy only gets a week.

Don't you guys know the golden rule that players with a 5 year clean record are treated differently to those who don't?

The 5 year clean record gives him a bonus 25% off anyway, so the MRP could gone medium impact which at worst wouldve meant 2 weeks with an early plea. Hardly a harsh penalty.

Did CJ get a free and a 50 metre penalty?
Why would he get a 50 metre penalty? He did get 2 weeks. What happens after that depends what has happened to the player previously.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13330
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Post: # 1086356Post The Fireman »

What's the chances of Daisy ever hitting anyone who is looking at him ?


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Post: # 1086357Post Dr Spaceman »

Solar wrote:low impact????

HUH?

This is a disgrace....

The AFL can go bite itself..... how a player can belt a opposition player, who then leaves the field with blood and is forced onto the bench for periods of the rest of the game be suggested as LOW IMPACT

Seriously this is becoming a bigger joke by the day
Solar, the guy's got rubbed out.

Let's not "kick him while he's down"! :wink:

:roll:


satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Post: # 1086367Post satchmo »

The Fireman wrote:What's the chances of Daisy ever hitting anyone who is looking at him ?
According to fat ed's new guidelines that is homophobic and racist. You are sentenced to one month with the felafel munching rapists.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Post: # 1086369Post Dr Spaceman »

satchmo wrote:
The Fireman wrote:What's the chances of Daisy ever hitting anyone who is looking at him ?
According to fat ed's new guidelines that is homophobic and racist. You are sentenced to one month with the felafel munching rapists.
So if Daisy came at Jones from behind, was he in fact going all brokeback? :wink:


lyonhearted
Club Player
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu 31 May 2007 12:20pm

Post: # 1086429Post lyonhearted »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
satchmo wrote:
The Fireman wrote:What's the chances of Daisy ever hitting anyone who is looking at him ?
According to fat ed's new guidelines that is homophobic and racist. You are sentenced to one month with the felafel munching rapists.
So if Daisy came at Jones from behind, was he in fact going all brokeback? :wink:
Wouldn't surprise me at all, let's face it, Daisy's not the most masculine 'bloke' in the AFL.


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13330
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Post: # 1086430Post The Fireman »

satchmo wrote:
The Fireman wrote:What's the chances of Daisy ever hitting anyone who is looking at him ?
According to fat ed's new guidelines that is homophobic and racist. You are sentenced to one month with the falafel munching rapists.
:lol:


I hate falafel. :wink:


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13330
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 680 times
Been thanked: 1966 times

Post: # 1086432Post The Fireman »

Dr Spaceman wrote:
satchmo wrote:
The Fireman wrote:What's the chances of Daisy ever hitting anyone who is looking at him ?
According to fat ed's new guidelines that is homophobic and racist. You are sentenced to one month with the felafel munching rapists.
So if Daisy came at Jones from behind, was he in fact going all brokeback? :wink:
Careful..Eddie will claim hypocrisy


Post Reply