centre clearances

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

centre clearances

Post: # 1077665Post stinger »

on league teams...anybody here the stats that taylor read out...


75 centre bounces where dal, joey and bj were present for two f****** clearances....f****** hell.....and gram is the one that gets dropped...????


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1077668Post SainterK »

Might be why we are trying something different this week?

Not sure what they can do about it, when many of the taps go to opposition mids.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: centre clearances

Post: # 1077669Post plugger66 »

stinger wrote:on league teams...anybody here the stats that taylor read out...


75 centre bounces where dal, joey and bj were present for two f****** clearances....f****** hell.....and gram is the one that gets dropped...????
So you would have dropped Dal and BJ and not brougt back Joey?


User avatar
ralphsmith
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Post: # 1077682Post ralphsmith »

2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(


What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
Image
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 1077685Post saintspremiers »

It's a disgrace.

The players are just plain lazy or unmotivated.

Pricks.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Post: # 1077690Post stinger »

ralphsmith wrote:2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(

that's what i thought.....so did taylor...


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1077700Post SainterK »

stinger wrote:
ralphsmith wrote:2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(

that's what i thought.....so did taylor...
I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11241
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 1077752Post Bernard Shakey »

SainterK wrote:
stinger wrote:
ralphsmith wrote:2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(

that's what i thought.....so did taylor...
I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.
If I was a mid, I wouldn't take much notice of where Kosi said it was going to go, I'd be watching the opposition ruckman.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1077758Post SainterK »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:
stinger wrote:
ralphsmith wrote:2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(

that's what i thought.....so did taylor...
I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.
If I was a mid, I wouldn't take much notice of where Kosi said it was going to go, I'd be watching the opposition ruckman.
That explains the year so far how?


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11241
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 1077761Post Bernard Shakey »

SainterK wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:
stinger wrote:
ralphsmith wrote:2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(

that's what i thought.....so did taylor...
I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.
If I was a mid, I wouldn't take much notice of where Kosi said it was going to go, I'd be watching the opposition ruckman.
That explains the year so far how?
We've been losing in the ruck for a couple of years now, so I don't think the mids have been taking much notice of our ruckmen. Lenny's not there anymore and he makes a mighty difference.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23247
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 741 times
Been thanked: 1800 times

Post: # 1077767Post Teflon »

dreadful.
embarrassing.
Hayes must be shaking his head.

Do we truly,solely rely on a 31yr old to be competitive out of the middle?

Actually going off the fact that the same 31yr old (with Goddard) was the only players responsible for dragging us back to a draw in GF1 ....why am I surprised??


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 1077769Post Spinner »

stinger wrote:
ralphsmith wrote:2...... Clearances......

Holy crap, that is woeful bordering on disgusting.

:(

that's what i thought.....so did taylor...

All three at the same time..? Or one of them at least.?


SaintSimmo
Club Player
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 1077772Post SaintSimmo »

that stat can not possibly be right, dal and goddard had 9 clearances in the hawks game alone.


Sainter for life.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1077773Post SainterK »

SaintSimmo wrote:that stat can not possibly be right, dal and goddard had 9 clearances in the hawks game alone.
CBC, I believe is different to overall clearances. They may of won those elsewhere than the centre circle.


SaintSimmo
Club Player
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 1077776Post SaintSimmo »

SainterK wrote:
SaintSimmo wrote:that stat can not possibly be right, dal and goddard had 9 clearances in the hawks game alone.
CBC, I believe is different to overall clearances. They may of won those elsewhere than the centre circle.
i see, but it still cant be correct, if there has been 75 centre clearances when (one of??) bj, dal or joey in the centre and (stkilda??) has won only 2 of those (or these players??). Surely it is these players have won a clearance, but i still find that very hard to believe.


Sainter for life.
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4951
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 497 times

Post: # 1077836Post Moods »

SaintSimmo wrote:
SainterK wrote:
SaintSimmo wrote:that stat can not possibly be right, dal and goddard had 9 clearances in the hawks game alone.
CBC, I believe is different to overall clearances. They may of won those elsewhere than the centre circle.
i see, but it still cant be correct, if there has been 75 centre clearances when (one of??) bj, dal or joey in the centre and (stkilda??) has won only 2 of those (or these players??). Surely it is these players have won a clearance, but i still find that very hard to believe.
I agree with saint simmo - whilst our clearance work at the centre bounces has been appalling, it certainly hasn't been that bad. I recall Joey had at least 2 clearances himself against Carlton.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 1077839Post matrix »

yeah that cant be right :?


User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7129
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Post: # 1077842Post SENsei »

SEN quoted a stat last night that Goddard had been involved in 67 centre contests this season and has been credited with winning 1.

One clearance in 67 attempts.

I say that again.....one. He has won the ball once in the centre.

Once.

That's intent not ability. That's mental not physical. He simply does not want the hard ball at the moment.

Read this BJ and prove me wrong tomorrow.


noob
Club Player
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 10:32am

Post: # 1077881Post noob »

How many has Armitage won?


User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 1077897Post Junction Oval »

Let's count Goddard's centre clearances on Saturday and post afterwards.

With star players, their quality eventually comes to the top. As supporters, we need to support him. It's just that we need it now and can't wait forever. :roll:


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Post: # 1077906Post Con Gorozidis »

SainterK wrote:I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.
'structuring up like they are supposed to"

what does that mean? like standing on an x like on a white board?
what utter nonsense. clearances are about 3 things:

1. reading the play
2. willingness to compete
3. strength speed and handling skills

i dont think its about 'structuring up" - like if u stand in the right spot on a space of 16msq the ball will just come to you?

im pretty sure if it was "structuring up" they would have come up with the right formula in 100 years of footy when we are only talking about 16m sq. how can u possibly give the benfit of the doubt on that?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Post: # 1077907Post Con Gorozidis »

noob wrote:How many has Armitage won?
not enough but more than the other clowns.


User avatar
BAM! (shhhh)
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2134
Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
Location: The little voice inside your head

Post: # 1077932Post BAM! (shhhh) »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
SainterK wrote:I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.
'structuring up like they are supposed to"

what does that mean? like standing on an x like on a white board?
what utter nonsense. clearances are about 3 things:

1. reading the play
2. willingness to compete
3. strength speed and handling skills

i dont think its about 'structuring up" - like if u stand in the right spot on a space of 16msq the ball will just come to you?

im pretty sure if it was "structuring up" they would have come up with the right formula in 100 years of footy when we are only talking about 16m sq. how can u possibly give the benfit of the doubt on that?
Are there really still people out there who don't get that clearances are about "structuring up"? Yes, structuring up is the stuff dictated by X's and O's on the whiteboard. This isn't some internet theory, this is what every AFL coach has been preaching for most of the last decade.

All of the 3 criteria listed above are still necessary, but this isn't the under-12s, this is AFL. Everyone on the ground has those attributes to the 99th percentile, and any edge you can get is sought.


"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Post: # 1077938Post Cairnsman »

I can't believe BJ wasn't dropped this week.

I thougtht we were solution based.

If he doesn't play well this week surely the blow torch will turn up.

But he's not the only star that needs a rocket.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Post: # 1077945Post sunsaint »

SainterK wrote:
I am prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

They could be structuring up exactly where they are supposed to, and being told by the ruckman that he is going to a certain set play.

I can only go by what is reflected in the omissions and selections, it doesn't seem to point towards the mids.
you got love that
I can just see McEvoy telling goddard and NDS & Montagna how to set up center plays...


Seeya
*************
Post Reply