To trade for a ruck or not to trade
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
To trade for a ruck or not to trade
Big McEvoy fan myself, but is clearly not quite ready to be number 1 ruck, though will probably hold down that spot for rest of the season.
Many posts have stated that trading for a good ruck is an absolute must. Problem being though, really good rucks can be hard to find and usually attract quite a lot of currency. If the club were to go for Bellchambers, the Bombers would want a first round pick. Despite past history when handing Essendon a first round pick, still seems like a no-brainer. But, if we end up with only six or so wins for the seasons, will the inclusion of an elite ruck man be the easy answer?
If we're in a rebuilding phase, will trading first round picks just put us back another season or so? Don't think it will be the missing ingredient for flag success, like Jolly was for the Pies.
Many posts have stated that trading for a good ruck is an absolute must. Problem being though, really good rucks can be hard to find and usually attract quite a lot of currency. If the club were to go for Bellchambers, the Bombers would want a first round pick. Despite past history when handing Essendon a first round pick, still seems like a no-brainer. But, if we end up with only six or so wins for the seasons, will the inclusion of an elite ruck man be the easy answer?
If we're in a rebuilding phase, will trading first round picks just put us back another season or so? Don't think it will be the missing ingredient for flag success, like Jolly was for the Pies.
Bad management is bad management
- stkildathunda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
- Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
- Contact:
Whether it's through a trade or free agency with someone out of contract we have to look at at least another tall because Ben, Stanley and Kosi seem to be it (given this is probably Gardi's last year) and no one looks likely to impact a game in that position currently.
You get the feeling there maybe one or two on the table next year given our current situation.
You get the feeling there maybe one or two on the table next year given our current situation.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
- stkildathunda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
- Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
- Contact:
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
For memory King rucked for us in 09, and Ottens played no partstkildathunda wrote:Dont rate Brad Ottens at all? Steven King?jonesy wrote:Cats and Hawks didn't need good ruckman to win a flag.
Whilst it's good to have one,our overwhelming prioroty has to be finding quality midfielders. It's a midfielders game
Bring back the Lockett era
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23247
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1800 times
- stkildathunda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
- Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
- Contact:
King played 07 and Ottens played 07 & 09 in their premierships.jonesy wrote:For memory King rucked for us in 09, and Ottens played no partstkildathunda wrote:Dont rate Brad Ottens at all? Steven King?jonesy wrote:Cats and Hawks didn't need good ruckman to win a flag.
Whilst it's good to have one,our overwhelming prioroty has to be finding quality midfielders. It's a midfielders game
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
King did us a lot in the 09 GF didn't he.
Ottens was barely a pinch hitter in the 09 finals,he was a cripple.
Blake was there ruckman,and a poor one at that
We've had a good history trading for ruckman. What did we give away for Brooks again? That was full of win. Imagine if those trades had of been used on midfielders
Let's fix the midfield
Ottens was barely a pinch hitter in the 09 finals,he was a cripple.
Blake was there ruckman,and a poor one at that
We've had a good history trading for ruckman. What did we give away for Brooks again? That was full of win. Imagine if those trades had of been used on midfielders
Let's fix the midfield
Bring back the Lockett era
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2428
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 160 times
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Wed 28 Apr 2004 7:47pm
- Location: Either work, home or the footy, maybe a pub somewhere
Trading for another ruck now is not going to help us. I agree Big Mac is not quite there yet but I don't think he is far away.
Given that we look like going with 1 main ruckman, trading someone else in will not help Mac develop. If we were to trade for an experienced ruckman that may play for 4 or 5 more years, then that is 4 or 5 or so years that Mac is sitting on the list doing nothing and could very well look at other options.
I'm not sure that Bellchambers is much to any more developed than what Mac is, so not sure we would be any better off. As for blake......please no.
I would rather stick with mac even if there is a little pain for the rest of this year and maybe next and then have him dominate (well maybe anyway) for the next 8-10 years, rather than recruit a unproven youngster or an established ruckman for 4-5 years.
Given that we look like going with 1 main ruckman, trading someone else in will not help Mac develop. If we were to trade for an experienced ruckman that may play for 4 or 5 more years, then that is 4 or 5 or so years that Mac is sitting on the list doing nothing and could very well look at other options.
I'm not sure that Bellchambers is much to any more developed than what Mac is, so not sure we would be any better off. As for blake......please no.
I would rather stick with mac even if there is a little pain for the rest of this year and maybe next and then have him dominate (well maybe anyway) for the next 8-10 years, rather than recruit a unproven youngster or an established ruckman for 4-5 years.
What doesn't kill us only makes us stronger.
Junction Oval wrote:We know that our ruck situation is killing us at the moment, particularly at Centre Bounces.
There are 16 matches to go, so let's see how Ben develops in that time. As others have said, our priorities are mid-fielders and a good forward (not Fev).
agreed...
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9151
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 438 times
A good ruck division in a grand final will give you a lot better chance at a premiership than a losing ruck. I reckon winning a premeirship with a losing ruck is more of an exception to the rule. There is more improvement yet in Macca, but I think we should just run Stanley as much as possible with him, even though Stanley needs more bulk and is pretty raw.
Why would we do anymore trades. The window is shut unless something drastic happens in the next 4 weeks. We will draft now for the next 5 years unless of course we trade a star away to get a couple of yound guys.
Last edited by plugger66 on Wed 11 May 2011 5:30pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Im happy to get a mature back up ruckman 21-25yo.
No way id risk any draft pick in the top 50 for a ruckman. With our tight slary cap we arent going to land a big fish like jolly.
So we need to scour the country for a 21-25 y.o late pick up.
Id have given patto another year as a back-up on minimum wage. is he playing anywhere out of interest?
but if we can get some 25yo ruck from the sanfl or something who is tough resilient and reliable id be happy. doesnt have to be a star.
No way id risk any draft pick in the top 50 for a ruckman. With our tight slary cap we arent going to land a big fish like jolly.
So we need to scour the country for a 21-25 y.o late pick up.
Id have given patto another year as a back-up on minimum wage. is he playing anywhere out of interest?
but if we can get some 25yo ruck from the sanfl or something who is tough resilient and reliable id be happy. doesnt have to be a star.
- GrumpyOne
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8163
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
- Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne
Agreed. Our midfield is being killed because our rucks are being beaten.Con Gorozidis wrote:Im happy to get a mature back up ruckman 21-25yo.
No way id risk any draft pick in the top 50 for a ruckman. With our tight slary cap we arent going to land a big fish like jolly.
So we need to scour the country for a 21-25 y.o late pick up.
Id have given patto another year as a back-up on minimum wage. is he playing anywhere out of interest?
but if we can get some 25yo ruck from the sanfl or something who is tough resilient and reliable id be happy. doesnt have to be a star.
Need a tall ruckman from somewhere, the new sub rule has cut down the midfield rotations, so a ruckman who actually taps to our players is essential. We have Archer in development, Stanley is not a ruckman's bootlace, Gardy is gone, so we need a backup for Kozi and Ben.
Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
Why would u need to draft another back up ruckman...
In todays rules only one straight ruckman can get a game, then a pinch hitter....like setanta last game...
Ben, whilst not competing in ball ups has improved around the ground with his grabs....he beat warnock easily the other night.....
All ben need to get better is about 5kg through the chest, and a stronger core...
Young stanley is the athletic type ruck/fwd....but needs to come on...
Getting another dinosaur will stuff his development.
In todays rules only one straight ruckman can get a game, then a pinch hitter....like setanta last game...
Ben, whilst not competing in ball ups has improved around the ground with his grabs....he beat warnock easily the other night.....
All ben need to get better is about 5kg through the chest, and a stronger core...
Young stanley is the athletic type ruck/fwd....but needs to come on...
Getting another dinosaur will stuff his development.
Totally agree. The days of 2 ruckmen that cant play anywhere else are over. Unless the backup ruckman is going to like Leigh Brown there is no point and as you point out it will not help Stanley doing that anyway.BigMart wrote:Why would u need to draft another back up ruckman...
In todays rules only one straight ruckman can get a game, then a pinch hitter....like setanta last game...
Ben, whilst not competing in ball ups has improved around the ground with his grabs....he beat warnock easily the other night.....
All ben need to get better is about 5kg through the chest, and a stronger core...
Young stanley is the athletic type ruck/fwd....but needs to come on...
Getting another dinosaur will stuff his development.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006 8:34am
- Location: Jurassic Park
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7087
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Don't think we need to trade for a superstar. Just a readymade, reliable player who we can count on to nullify the stars and beat the hacks. North, Brisbane and Sydney have too many rucks and most of them can play. See if we can get one of McIntosh, Seaby, Leuenberger, Pyke or Clark. All have played good footy as the main man and none of them would be too happy in their current situation. We really should have taken Giles or Robert Campbell last year though.
Why the hell would any of those players you mentioned get released or even worse how whould some of them help us? And Robert Campbell isnt even close to playing at Melbourne. He is a hack and who the hell is Giles. Sometime people live in fantasy land.mad saint guy wrote:Don't think we need to trade for a superstar. Just a readymade, reliable player who we can count on to nullify the stars and beat the hacks. North, Brisbane and Sydney have too many rucks and most of them can play. See if we can get one of McIntosh, Seaby, Leuenberger, Pyke or Clark. All have played good footy as the main man and none of them would be too happy in their current situation. We really should have taken Giles or Robert Campbell last year though.