I almost feel sorry for Hawthorn
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I almost feel sorry for Hawthorn
The boys went a long way to restoring my Faith last night..... but for a few skill errors the game was ours..... (and you've got to remember that The Blues pantsed us around the same point last season)
...what returned was the intensity and hardness that was a cornerstone of this side for the past 2 seasons.......
...what I saw was a hunger re-ignited and a belief in the team...
..the boys were gutted by the loss... and determined to do better..... I almost pity the Hawks this weekend.....
I'll be tipping The Saints with confidence.
one on one The Saints can match anyone.
...what returned was the intensity and hardness that was a cornerstone of this side for the past 2 seasons.......
...what I saw was a hunger re-ignited and a belief in the team...
..the boys were gutted by the loss... and determined to do better..... I almost pity the Hawks this weekend.....
I'll be tipping The Saints with confidence.
one on one The Saints can match anyone.
- saintdooley
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2006 2:32pm
Re: I almost feel sorry for Hawthorn
BakesFan wrote: one on one The Saints can match anyone.
thats debatable
"Another storied win in Robert Harvey's career. They say he is the embodiment of their motto of strength through loyalty, and on the day he became just the tenth man to play 350 league games the saints reward him with a seemingly impossible victory."
- Mr X from the West
- Club Player
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 5:58pm
- Location: Subiaco
Re: I almost feel sorry for Hawthorn
Hope you're right but all our game plan does is "kep us in it". ie not win it(ala Collingwood)!BakesFan wrote:The boys went a long way to restoring my Faith last night..... but for a few skill errors the game was ours..... (and you've got to remember that The Blues pantsed us around the same point last season)
...what returned was the intensity and hardness that was a cornerstone of this side for the past 2 seasons.......
...what I saw was a hunger re-ignited and a belief in the team...
..the boys were gutted by the loss... and determined to do better..... I almost pity the Hawks this weekend.....
I'll be tipping The Saints with confidence.
one on one The Saints can match anyone.
"Blow out the candle I will burn again tomorrow"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11354
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1349 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19161
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1609 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Re: I almost feel sorry for Hawthorn
Very disappointing attitude you have. As a cheer sqaud memeber you should live in la la land and believe that we are the greatest team that has ever walked the planet.saintdooley wrote:BakesFan wrote: one on one The Saints can match anyone.
thats debatable
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7088
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
Don't know about that last statement. We had plenty of good performers last night but the bottom rung was really shown up. Baker, McQualter, Jones, Clarke and at times Blake were just horribly off the pace and outclassed. We also struggled to win a clearance all night despite Judd being relatively quiet by his standards. We didn't lose because a lack of effort, we lost because of a lack of pace, skill and smarts. We were lucky Carlton were so bad in front of goal which let us back in the game in the third. An unfortunately there isn't much left at Sandy to come in an replace these bottom players. Polo may offer improvement on Jones or McQualter, Simpkin or Walsh could take Blake's spot and Lynch could be developed at half back but none of those guys will make the difference.
Time to get games into the kids and make decisions on the fringe players.
Time to get games into the kids and make decisions on the fringe players.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
I thought that we hunted Carlton last night, especially Judd and Murphy and it nearly paid off.
My targets at Hawthorn would be Sam Mitchell, who gives quite a bit but really doesn't like it when he's on the receiving end and Jordan Lewis who is a Hot Head who can lose his cool pretty quickly. Are there any other Hawks that we should "HUNT"? !!
My targets at Hawthorn would be Sam Mitchell, who gives quite a bit but really doesn't like it when he's on the receiving end and Jordan Lewis who is a Hot Head who can lose his cool pretty quickly. Are there any other Hawks that we should "HUNT"? !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
well if they can get Judd riled without intention ( and without a tag) Lewis should be a breeze..Eastern wrote:I thought that we hunted Carlton last night, especially Judd and Murphy and it nearly paid off.
My targets at Hawthorn would be Sam Mitchell, who gives quite a bit but really doesn't like it when he's on the receiving end and Jordan Lewis who is a Hot Head who can lose his cool pretty quickly. Are there any other Hawks that we should "HUNT"? !!
Poor Juddy he must have felt lonely with out Bakes or Cj in his back pocket.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Get a rifle and take out some wild deers or roos.Eastern wrote:I thought that we hunted Carlton last night, especially Judd and Murphy and it nearly paid off.
My targets at Hawthorn would be Sam Mitchell, who gives quite a bit but really doesn't like it when he's on the receiving end and Jordan Lewis who is a Hot Head who can lose his cool pretty quickly. Are there any other Hawks that we should "HUNT"? !!
This is a footy forum not a hunting forum
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Bloody John Howard and his gun laws !!saintspremiers wrote:Get a rifle and take out some wild deers or roos.Eastern wrote:I thought that we hunted Carlton last night, especially Judd and Murphy and it nearly paid off.
My targets at Hawthorn would be Sam Mitchell, who gives quite a bit but really doesn't like it when he's on the receiving end and Jordan Lewis who is a Hot Head who can lose his cool pretty quickly. Are there any other Hawks that we should "HUNT"? !!
This is a footy forum not a hunting forum
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11354
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1349 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
ummmm... what racist undertones?twirlyhair wrote:If you don't mind, but can we avoid the racist undertones?Sainternist wrote:yeah, we're a good chance against the poos&wees. my greatest concern, however, is that we're playing at the mcg, not jihad stadium.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 484 times
- Contact:
Not a racist undertone there...twirlyhair wrote:If you don't mind, but can we avoid the racist undertones?Sainternist wrote:yeah, we're a good chance against the poos&wees. my greatest concern, however, is that we're playing at the mcg, not jihad stadium.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad
Many of the references there could be applied in sporting context.
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:18am
- Location: Noble Park
FFS what are you, the PC police? Can't you see the joke....it's partly that our home ground's name keep changing due to the almighty dollar! This time around Etihad airways is the highest bidder.twirlyhair wrote:If you don't mind, but can we avoid the racist undertones?Sainternist wrote:yeah, we're a good chance against the poos&wees. my greatest concern, however, is that we're playing at the mcg, not jihad stadium.
And please...we are allowed to say 'jihad' in a jocular context surely.
We ain't scared of Bin laden anymore.
In honour of those who went before, in the dark and desperate years.
Eh?evertonfc wrote:Unconvinced we can beat top six teams.
Games against Carlton and Geelong that could have gone either way suggest differently Ev.
Admittedly we were flogged by the Bombers.
I'd say that we're no match for the pies either, but that we have a reasonable chance against both Hawthorn and Fremantle.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Sat 26 Apr 2008 10:45pm
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 97 times
Your ignorance is not the only offensive aspect of your response. But more about that shortly. To spell it out for you (and clearly others), the use of the word Jihad with Etihad stadium is seen as offensive by Muslims as it is a unfair and divisive 'throw away' line that only further stereotypes people or organisations that are identified as Muslim. Consider the Muslim kids that attend Saints games and hear you saying Jihad stadium. As a father how would you respond to your child when this is asked? And why not take it further and label the Pies as Jihad Collingwood? (Major sponsor Emirates), or walk into Crazy Johns and say 'Jihad Jihad' because the founder was Muslim? But back to your original premise in your thread. Quote ..'And please...we are allowed to say 'jihad' in a jocular context surely.' This is the most insidious aspect of bigotry as it works on the basis that those who are offensive get to decide whether it is offensive or not. Much like the racists who continually abused players like Nicky Winmar and then would say 'but I'm just joking around', your beliefs belong to times past.I Love Peter Kiel wrote:FFS what are you, the PC police? Can't you see the joke....it's partly that our home ground's name keep changing due to the almighty dollar! This time around Etihad airways is the highest bidder.twirlyhair wrote:If you don't mind, but can we avoid the racist undertones?Sainternist wrote:yeah, we're a good chance against the poos&wees. my greatest concern, however, is that we're playing at the mcg, not jihad stadium.
And please...we are allowed to say 'jihad' in a jocular context surely.
We ain't scared of Bin laden anymore.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11354
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1349 times
- Been thanked: 462 times
Relax Max. I'm no racist.twirlyhair wrote:Your ignorance is not the only offensive aspect of your response. But more about that shortly. To spell it out for you (and clearly others), the use of the word Jihad with Etihad stadium is seen as offensive by Muslims as it is a unfair and divisive 'throw away' line that only further stereotypes people or organisations that are identified as Muslim. Consider the Muslim kids that attend Saints games and hear you saying Jihad stadium. As a father how would you respond to your child when this is asked? And why not take it further and label the Pies as Jihad Collingwood? (Major sponsor Emirates), or walk into Crazy Johns and say 'Jihad Jihad' because the founder was Muslim? But back to your original premise in your thread. Quote ..'And please...we are allowed to say 'jihad' in a jocular context surely.' This is the most insidious aspect of bigotry as it works on the basis that those who are offensive get to decide whether it is offensive or not. Much like the racists who continually abused players like Nicky Winmar and then would say 'but I'm just joking around', your beliefs belong to times past.I Love Peter Kiel wrote:FFS what are you, the PC police? Can't you see the joke....it's partly that our home ground's name keep changing due to the almighty dollar! This time around Etihad airways is the highest bidder.twirlyhair wrote:If you don't mind, but can we avoid the racist undertones?Sainternist wrote:yeah, we're a good chance against the poos&wees. my greatest concern, however, is that we're playing at the mcg, not jihad stadium.
And please...we are allowed to say 'jihad' in a jocular context surely.
We ain't scared of Bin laden anymore.
PEACE IN DA MIDDLE EAST
...and enjoy the song
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times