Raph's CLANGER

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 1071907Post borderbarry »

He was on the ground about 6 minutes. Was trying too hard for one thing. And should not have been picked as sub. Peake would have made a better sub.


Saint_Ash
Club Player
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed 28 Apr 2004 7:47pm
Location: Either work, home or the footy, maybe a pub somewhere

Post: # 1071909Post Saint_Ash »

Sainternist wrote:
defacto wrote:before you pay out on clarke. re-watch blakes game. he is the one that cost us tonight.

a highlights reel of f*** ups that gave carltank goals or cost us an opportunity at a certain goal.
what i wanna know is, was that free kick against blake which resulted into the walker mark then goal a legit free?
Yes it was a free kick, but it was not consistent with many others that hadn't been paid throughout the night. In the last 10 minutes of the game the umpires put the whistle away and that was about the only free that was paid.


What doesn't kill us only makes us stronger.
User avatar
Saints43
Club Player
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
Location: L2 A38
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Post: # 1071911Post Saints43 »

SainterK wrote:He wasn't good tonight.

Sub is just never is going to be his thing though, is a player who warms up in a game IMO, builds in confidence.

Not a good role for him.

Expect Winmar to be the sub next week.
My brother has always said that Raph needs to play a quarter of AFL level football before the first qurater of a Saints match. As above, he works himself into a game.

We mentioned at the start of the match that he was an unusual type to be sub.

If we know that then the selection committee should know that.

And he should have gotten a free kick.

And it was a poor effort for a professional, 8-10 year player.


User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7129
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Post: # 1071915Post SENsei »

Saints43 wrote: We mentioned at the start of the match that he was an unusual type to be sub.

If we know that then the selection committee should know that.
Yep. Exactly. Stick the boots into Raph all you like, but let's look a little deeper into the issue.

Poor coaching/selection decision to even have him as a sub.

Edit/Addition: Last week Michael Voss played Merrett in the forward line. He's got the rounds of the kitchen for a poor decision. No one is canning Merrett for not performing....he was doing what he was told.

Raph should never be a sub and should either be a back pocket full time or in the Sandy team full time. Not a sub.


User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Post: # 1071950Post GrumpyOne »

Saints43 wrote:
SainterK wrote:He wasn't good tonight.

Sub is just never is going to be his thing though, is a player who warms up in a game IMO, builds in confidence.

Not a good role for him.

Expect Winmar to be the sub next week.
My brother has always said that Raph needs to play a quarter of AFL level football before the first qurater of a Saints match. As above, he works himself into a game.

We mentioned at the start of the match that he was an unusual type to be sub.

If we know that then the selection committee should know that.

And he should have gotten a free kick.

And it was a poor effort for a professional, 8-10 year player.
Your brother is spot on. Raph should be on the ground at the start or not playing at all. You can tell in the first 15 minutes whether he is switched on or not. If you are going to persevere with him, give him the first quarter and make your judgement from that.

Lynch in next week.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
InkerSaint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2132
Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm

Post: # 1071961Post InkerSaint »

Yep. Why make excuses for Raph? And why compare him to Blake?

Neither should be on the list next year.

We should expect to see Lynch, Simpkin, Walsh gradually introduced and settled into the team by August.


"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
Thinline
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6043
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd

Post: # 1071962Post Thinline »

Sub or not it was an inexcusable error by an experienced bloke who needs to do the right thing in pressure circumstances. He catches that, looks up to a vacant wing, and we're potentially away and inside fifty either having a shot or locked up in a stoppage at a crucial moment.

I feel for the bloke. He knew it was the clanger to end all clangers. His grimace spoke volumes. But how costly to a team that had busted its guts to get in a position to win the seemingly unwinnable.

Heartbreaking. Not good enough in the real world.

Lynch in now.


"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1071965Post SainterK »

I actually doubt he would of played if Winmar hadn't missed so much footy being the emergency.


User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Post: # 1071979Post GrumpyOne »

SainterK wrote:I actually doubt he would of played if Winmar hadn't missed so much footy being the emergency.
Winmar has had a couple of quiet weeks with Sandy. Lynch is the man.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1071984Post SainterK »

GrumpyOne wrote:
SainterK wrote:I actually doubt he would of played if Winmar hadn't missed so much footy being the emergency.
Winmar has had a couple of quiet weeks with Sandy. Lynch is the man.
I would like Lynch in, but does it really give him a position if it's for Raph and Blake and Dawson are selected?

I would of thought he is likely to replace Blake if anyone?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Post: # 1071992Post Con Gorozidis »

Raph certainly not capable of playing at the pace/intensity required for AFL footy. hes just a walking calamity cos hes always a step off the pace so then makes mistake after mistake.

But play him for the rest of the year and then de-list. hes great for us tanking games and getting a high pick. hes our secret weapon!


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1072001Post SainterK »

I actually think Raph is a walking functioning self fulfilling prophecy.

It's terribly sad, but I truly believe he has come to expect these kind of moments of himself. That ball would of been coming in, and I reckon he would of had negative thoughts as it was flying through the air.

His head space appears cooked after years of being a whipping boy, injury, and as I heard Finey say last night....an inability to build on a good game/moment with another in succession.


User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 1072030Post Solar »

SainterK wrote:I actually think Raph is a walking functioning self fulfilling prophecy.

It's terribly sad, but I truly believe he has come to expect these kind of moments of himself. That ball would of been coming in, and I reckon he would of had negative thoughts as it was flying through the air.

His head space appears cooked after years of being a whipping boy, injury, and as I heard Finey say last night....an inability to build on a good game/moment with another in succession.
perfectly put. Add thefact that they stuffed up by picking him as the sub and you might have seen the last game by this talented but unfulfilled player. Will never forget that prelim final in 2009.


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7262
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Post: # 1072131Post evertonfc »

Legendary wrote:Would not get drafted by another club if we delisted him.[]

I don't know a football supporter from another team in the AFL who thinks he is any good.

Find me a non-St Kilda supporter who believes R Clarke is useful in any way.

His performance was poor against Carlton.

He might do some good things, but he lacks the basic ability to make good decisions under pressure and that is critical at AFL level.
Summed up accurately.

We'd all love Raph to succeed but the fact is that for the odd glimpse he shows, his inability to convert that into something meaningful is continually costing us.

He made critical errors last night. It is the frequency with which he commits them versus his total output that makes him a target.

I'd say Gram makes as many errors - perhaps even more. But rarely are they so cataclysmic, and his output can very high.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 1072140Post Sobraz »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Enrico-Misso starts a new post bagging Raph what a surprise?
Nearly as surprising as you keeping quiet about Kosi's game... :roll:

You'd have traded Kosi years ago, yet keep up the Raph support.. Pick and choose...

I've been a Raph supporter, but he is gone...

He has just become a terrible, fumbling liabilty, and being played in the back half, nearly always results in an opposition score...

Dont know how much more Lynch has to do, but he must come in this week on the half back line, not as the sub, and Raph must be delisted at years end... After 8 years, he has run his race...

As mentioned earlier, if/once delisted, there would be no takers in the draft... Unless GWS can flip us a pick in the 60's or 70's... Take that...


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1072144Post plugger66 »

Can someone at least explain to me why Clarke would be sub. I reckon we have got the sub person wrong nearly every game. Maybe we dont have a sub type person. Also why would Cripps sub off and not Siposs. We needed as much pace as possible out on the ground last night.


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Post: # 1072145Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

Raph's disastrous performance last night is the exact reason I said a couple of weeks ago (in the week leading up to him being sent back to Sandy) that I would send him to Sandy and not select him for St Kilda again, unless he ripped the VFL apart for about 6 consecutive weeks.
But what do they do? They give him just a couple of weeks and pick him again after one reasonably good game. WTF? As if that was going to be enough to get his confidence back to the level it needs to be! :roll:
His problems have got to be pretty much all above the shoulders and that was not going to turn around with one decent performance in the VFL.
Again, send him back to Sandy and pick him ONLY if he just completely dominates for weeks and gets his confidence back to where it needs to be, to be able to play AFL games without committing monumental, demoralising clangers, on a regular basis.
If not, never pick him again. Ever. Please. Enough is enough.
I reckon the same could pretty much be said about Mini, who manages to commit massive, costly f***-ups on a regular basis now. They are just demoralising.
Last edited by AnythingsPossibleSaints on Tue 10 May 2011 3:36pm, edited 2 times in total.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1072146Post SainterK »

plugger66 wrote:Can someone at least explain to me why Clarke would be sub. I reckon we have got the sub person wrong nearly every game. Maybe we dont have a sub type person. Also why would Cripps sub off and not Siposs. We needed as much pace as possible out on the ground last night.
I don't think our sub is tactical, I think it's the player left after every else has a role.


User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Post: # 1072147Post Dr Spaceman »

plugger66 wrote:Can someone at least explain to me why Clarke would be sub. I reckon we have got the sub person wrong nearly every game. Maybe we dont have a sub type person. Also why would Cripps sub off and not Siposs. We needed as much pace as possible out on the ground last night.
There are suggestions that Cripps was injured.

Certainly didn't look to be moving too well on the TV.


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Post: # 1072189Post maverick »

plugger66 wrote:Can someone at least explain to me why Clarke would be sub. I reckon we have got the sub person wrong nearly every game. Maybe we dont have a sub type person. Also why would Cripps sub off and not Siposs. We needed as much pace as possible out on the ground last night.
Looked injured to me, or at least very sore.

Siposs needs game time and development, had to stay on.
Bakes should of gone off if Cripps was OK


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5026
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Post: # 1072192Post maverick »

BigMart wrote:Yes gwlt made a critical error......and also did 15 good things.....you can hack that ratio
100% agree, I would say, Gwilt is our best decision maker coming out of defence.

I was a Raph fan, I have now jumped off the bandwagon.
At the game, you just KNEW he was going to drop the mark and be dispossesseed of the ball.

Real shame, I like his run through the lines, the negative is just too much to carry.


Post Reply