Saints v Bombers...game thread and live scores!

Statsman · Post: # 1058818Post **Statsman** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:23pm

Gram turnover, Bombers goal. Again!

matrix · Post: # 1058819Post **matrix** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:23pm

bj at full back...on watson

degruch · Post: # 1058821Post **degruch** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:23pm

savatage wrote:Gram needs to be dropped.

RL needs to make a point there...take pot shots at the team and don't back it up, you're gone.

savatage · Post: # 1058822Post **savatage** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:24pm

degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Gram needs to be dropped.
RL needs to make a point there...take pot shots at the team and don't back it up, you're gone.

20 disposals of absolute s***.

kalsaint · Post: # 1058825Post **kalsaint** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:26pm

savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Gram needs to be dropped.
RL needs to make a point there...take pot shots at the team and don't back it up, you're gone.
20 disposals of absolute s***.

Gram has become a liability with his kicking like Mainwaring was for the Eagles when thay had solid defence.

His kicking just provides opportunity for Essendon time and time again.

Con Gorozidis · Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:26pm

savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Gram needs to be dropped.
RL needs to make a point there...take pot shots at the team and don't back it up, you're gone.
20 disposals of absolute s***.

i honestly think grammy has been on of our best.

least of our worries.

matrix · Post: # 1058827Post **matrix** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:27pm

gee whos that lining up
free inside the 50 for a mark
??

and goals

F*** me

degruch · Post: # 1058828Post **degruch** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:27pm

Con Gorozidis wrote:
savatage wrote:
degruch wrote:
savatage wrote:Gram needs to be dropped.
RL needs to make a point there...take pot shots at the team and don't back it up, you're gone.
20 disposals of absolute s***.
i honestly think grammy has been on of our best.

least of our worries.

Gilbert can go with him.

kalsaint · Post: # 1058829Post **kalsaint** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:27pm

matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson

I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.

savatage · Post: # 1058830Post **savatage** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:28pm

matrix wrote:gee whos that lining up
free inside the 50 for a mark
??

and goals

F*** me

His eyes must light up when he's due to play us. Free ride.

Statsman · Post: # 1058831Post **Statsman** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:28pm

Con Gorozidis wrote: i honestly think grammy has been on of our best.

least of our worries.

Seriously? Gram has contributed to more Bombers goals than Watson. Lots of touches from Gram, but he's setting up goal after goal for the Bombers with his poor disposal.

matrix · Post: # 1058832Post **matrix** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:28pm

kalsaint wrote:
matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson
I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.

didnt work did it

peake on gamble off (sub change)

savatage · Post: # 1058833Post **savatage** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:28pm

kalsaint wrote:
matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson
I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.

Is the point for St.Kilda to get thrashed?

degruch · Post: # 1058834Post **degruch** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:29pm

kalsaint wrote:
matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson
I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.

It might work, if we only lost by the number of goals Watson kicks...but it's hard to tell when they walk over us by 20!

savatage · Post: # 1058835Post **savatage** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:29pm

matrix wrote:
kalsaint wrote:
matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson
I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.
didnt work did it

peake on gamble off (sub change)

Gamble has weakened our forward line.

wasaintsfan · Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:30pm

grams had wat 1 bad touch? Who decided to drop archer and put stanley in. Genius. Least archer makes a challange. Deserved another game.

desertsaint · Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:30pm

kalsaint wrote:
matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson
I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.

i think the only point ross has made is that he has nfi about an attacking plan!

desertsaint · Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:31pm

desertsaint wrote:
kalsaint wrote:
matrix wrote:bj at full back...on watson
I think Ross is making a point here to about Goddard being accounable.
i think the only point ross has made is that he has nfi about an attacking plan!

see that? fingers...mind of their own!

ralphsmith · Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:31pm

Jack Steven goal, from a superb piece of down the ground linking up from the saints.

matrix · Post: # 1058843Post **matrix** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:31pm

stanley to steven
squeezes it in
goal and assist from two of the youth

cmon saints
show some farking spirit

matrix · Post: # 1058845Post **matrix** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:32pm

grams had one bad touch???
hes shanked six kicks i reckon
3 have cost goals

savatage · Post: # 1058846Post **savatage** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:33pm

Undisciplined play Schneider. Costs us a goal.

Statsman · Post: # 1058847Post **Statsman** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:33pm

Gram kicks straight to Heppell, goal to Winderlich.

desertsaint · Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:34pm

commentatora have called it - saints gone - not just for this game, they are gone!

degruch · Post: # 1058849Post **degruch** » Sun 10 Apr 2011 7:35pm

Statsman wrote:Gram kicks straight to Heppell, goal to Winderlich.

...and his previous kick out of defence to Milne was a shank that got lucky! Just terrible.