What did everyone think of our jumper?

dcstkfc · Post: # 1052246Post **dcstkfc** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 7:31pm

Entirely black back. Didn't mind it personally.

Dr Spaceman · Sat 26 Mar 2011 7:35pm

dcstkfc wrote:Entirely black back. Didn't mind it personally.

Spoke to a Bulldogs supporter today who, without any prompting, remarked how good the Saints jumpers looked on TV last night.

desertsaint · Sat 26 Mar 2011 7:41pm

like it a lot - nice with the black v neck too.

matrix · Post: # 1052252Post **matrix** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:01pm

whooooaaa there betsies.......hold ya horses

we better run this past barks before voicing an opinion on lasts night farking fantastic looking jumper

fingers · Post: # 1052257Post **fingers** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:08pm

Loved it.

barks4eva · Post: # 1052258Post **barks4eva** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:09pm

The white is too thin!

All panels should be of equal size!

ANY changes to the jumper should be voted in by a majority of MEMBERS, NOT by the whims of a board member or two!

I think it's disgraceful that these decisions are made without any consultation with the members!

saintnick12 · Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:20pm

Loved it!!!

it's amazing how much difference such a small extra amount of black has made.

Looks a bit "tougher' too for mine....I know that sounds silly, but that's what I see

clarky449 · Post: # 1052263Post **clarky449** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:21pm

barks4eva wrote:The white is too thin!

All panels should be of equal size!

ANY changes to the jumper should be voted in by a majority of MEMBERS, NOT by the whims of a board member or two!

I think it's disgraceful that these decisions are made without any consultation with the members!

Cry me a river.

Dr Spaceman · Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:23pm

barks4eva wrote:The white is too thin!

All panels should be of equal size!

ANY changes to the jumper should be voted in by a majority of MEMBERS, NOT by the whims of a board member or two!

I think it's disgraceful that these decisions are made without any consultation with the members!

I just want them to play better

ando051 · Post: # 1052265Post **ando051** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:23pm

Liked it, looks more outstanding.

kosifantutti23 · Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:58pm

I'm not happy with them just tweaking the design of the jumper on a whim.

Pick a design and stick with it.

eg

Sainternist · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:05pm

barks4eva wrote:The white is too thin!

All panels should be of equal size!

I agree. It makes it look too similiar to Essendon's, but otherwise it looks sharp enough.

I think the idea of tweaking the design is all to do with marketing.

Nothing's sacred in footy today.

bobmurray · Post: # 1052283Post **bobmurray** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:09pm

Looked great.....

I think the Saints are the leaders in alternate strips....and...they probably have the most...

Bernard Shakey · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:09pm

Very aggressive looking, a winner as far as I'm concerned.

Dr Spaceman · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:12pm

clarky449 wrote:
barks4eva wrote:The white is too thin!

All panels should be of equal size!

Is that when the jumper is laid flat on a table or when it's wrapped around a body?

There is a difference.

perfectionist · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:18pm

It's not surprising that the teams with the most premierships have had the least changes. Alas, the reverse is also the case. Pick a design and stick with it for the next 100 years. Then change it. Just what do these morons think the word "tradition" means? (Just call me Tevya). Yes of course you can sell more of new design than an old, but I would take a flag anytime over sales.

Dr Spaceman · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:20pm

perfectionist wrote:It's not surprising that the teams with the most premierships have had the least changes. Alas, the reverse is also the case. Pick a design and stick with it for the next 100 years. Then change it. Just what do these morons think the word "tradition" means? (Just call me Tevya). Yes of course you can sell more of new design than an old, but I would take a flag anytime over sales.

How does tinkering with your jumper cost you a flag?

bergsone · Post: # 1052305Post **bergsone** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:30pm

Jumper was ok,didnt mind it ,seen us wear a lot worse last few years

asiu · Post: # 1052306Post **asiu** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:31pm

havnt read the thread ..don' wanna know

the jumper looked alright , imo ... strong

but we played like big poofs in it , so who gives a flying monkeys

ralphsmith · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:34pm

Looked really good

perfectionist · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:47pm

Dr Spaceman wrote:How does tinkering with your jumper cost you a flag?

gazrat wrote:.. we played like big poofs in it ...

Interesting thoughts. Maybe we should play nude and catch the opposition off guard. Hang on, that would only work for some players.

Enrico_Misso · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:54pm

It looked OK from the front.

BUT

From the back I kept thinking we looked like Carlton.
We need some red and white, even if only a border.
R W & B is our brand.

So basically I think it is a fail.

3rd generation saint · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:56pm

It will look good up on the premiership dias.

Dr Spaceman · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:58pm

Enrico_Misso wrote:It looked OK from the front.

BUT

From the back I kept thinking we looked like Carlton.
We need some red and white, even if only a border.
R W & B is our brand.

So basically I think it is a fail.

The back had a fair bit of white - I call them numbers.

And since when did the back ever have any red?

Enrico_Misso · Sat 26 Mar 2011 10:11pm

The back never had any red.

But at least with the white border we didn't look like Carlton.

We should have a jumper that is uniquely StKilda.
And is readily identifiable from ALL sides.

I agree with Barks, we should go back to the three even width panels at the front.

But perhaps the back should have a narrow red and white border so we look like StKilda from behind.

What did everyone think of our jumper?

What did everyone think of our jumper?

Re: What did everyone think of our jumper?