New proble looms on Milne rape case according to the Hun!

White Winmar · Sun 20 Mar 2011 6:30pm

Please Sainternist, do not take the name of Lionel Hutz in vain. Any lawyer who uses a piece of rope for a belt, lives in a dumpster and has a sponge for a business card, deserves some respect. We are not worthy!

satchmo · Post: # 1049872Post **satchmo** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 6:43pm

Moods wrote: I won't bother rehashing our last debate, needless to say it's my belief that going by your twisting of facts I'm wondering if you're a journalist.

Of course you wont, ya big gumboot, because that's where your credibility was buried!

matrix · Post: # 1049877Post **matrix** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 6:51pm

why on earth is the R word in the title anyway?
it could be deleted and we'd still all know what the thread was about

satchmo · Post: # 1049878Post **satchmo** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 6:52pm

matrix wrote:why on earth is the R word in the title anyway?
it could be deleted and we'd still all know what the thread was about

absofrikenlutely!

plugger66 · Post: # 1049882Post **plugger66** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 7:03pm

Interesting.

satchmo · Post: # 1049895Post **satchmo** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 7:20pm

plugger66 wrote:Interesting.

Liar, liar, eddie mcguire!

Moods · Post: # 1049914Post **Moods** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 7:56pm

satchmo wrote:
Moods wrote: I won't bother rehashing our last debate, needless to say it's my belief that going by your twisting of facts I'm wondering if you're a journalist.

Of course you wont, ya big gumboot, because that's where your credibility was buried!

In your eyes of course.

Now get back on your bike and start pedaling - backwards

satchmo · Post: # 1049926Post **satchmo** » Sun 20 Mar 2011 8:23pm

Moods wrote:
satchmo wrote:
Moods wrote: I won't bother rehashing our last debate, needless to say it's my belief that going by your twisting of facts I'm wondering if you're a journalist.

Of course you wont, ya big gumboot, because that's where your credibility was buried!
In your eyes of course.

Now get back on your bike and start pedaling - backwards

I suppose if I hurry I can catch up with you!

FortiusQuoFidelius · Tue 22 Mar 2011 12:26pm

joffaboy wrote:So is this story insinuating that the DPP is corrupt as well?

Perhaps you should ask that question after Justice Vincent hands down the result of his enquiry!!

SaintPav · Post: # 1050307Post **SaintPav** » Tue 22 Mar 2011 3:46pm

I heard that her mum went ballistic when she heard that her daughter had slept around and that she was the one who was really pursuing the case.

Eastern · Post: # 1050312Post **Eastern** » Tue 22 Mar 2011 3:57pm

SaintPav wrote:I heard that her mum went ballistic when she heard that her daughter had slept around and that she was the one who was really pursuing the case.

Change mum to dad and you've hit the nail on the head !!

eppo67 · Post: # 1050313Post **eppo67** » Tue 22 Mar 2011 3:58pm

SaintPav wrote:I heard that her mum went ballistic when she heard that her daughter had slept around and that she was the one who was really pursuing the case.

Correct!! But as Eastern said my very good source said it was Dad as well.