New proble looms on Milne rape case according to the Hun!

[Selhurst Saint]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

[meher baba]

Gee wiz: I thought that was all ancient history now. Since that happened I've been through two divorces, three changes of career and moved interstate four times!!

AKA "on the run"??

Nope, that would be too exciting. If my name was to match the story of life, it would be more like "aka S**t Happens"!!

[meher baba]

Or perhaps "Life's a bitch, then you marry one....then you marry another one...and then...(I'd say "and then you die", but I might have time to fit in a couple more s**t marriages before I die! )

[matrix]

blimey
ones enough!!

and thats because it basically costs too much money

[Richter]

While i generally share plugger66's view that too many posters on here believe that the media and the footy world are all conspiring against us, perhaps that is the case here to some extent.

The point is that while the media are picking out the Saints for every possible sniff of an infraction no matter how innocuous, what are they NOT reporting?

The media aren't picking out St Kilda because of who we are, but because of who we are not.

[GRAMophone]

My first thought also was that the timimg of the Milne article is possibly quite orchestrated to reignite the Saints bad boys vibe and deflect from the protected team.

Put the Milne article on the same page as Nixon and effectively increase the bad branding of the Saints

[saintsRrising]

HS rag just speculating again...

The OPI is an investigation into the police...not Milne.

The rag's only interest is to sell papers and so the reporter just makes up bulls***.

[St Lenny]

My first thought also was that the timimg of the Milne article is possibly quite orchestrated to reignite the Saints bad boys vibe and deflect from the protected team.

Put the Milne article on the same page as Nixon and effectively increase the bad branding of the Saints

Spot on, hence the new article about "bad boy Zac", unreal.............

[St Lenny]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

[plugger66]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

What actually happened? I take it you were there.

[satchmo]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

What actually happened? I take it you were there.

You should know; you read and believe.

[plugger66]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

What actually happened? I take it you were there.

You should know; you read and believe.

Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.

[matrix]

opinion=bad
sheep=good

[satchmo]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

What actually happened? I take it you were there.

You should know; you read and believe.

Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.

Both cases thrown out.

Which case is the hs still dragging up, even though it's a lot older?

When was the last time that the hs mentioned the collingwood rape?

[plugger66]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

What actually happened? I take it you were there.

You should know; you read and believe.

Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.

Both cases thrown out.

Which case is the hs still dragging up, even though it's a lot older?

When was the last time that the hs mentioned the collingwood rape?

Dont know. Cant remember the cops looking into that case though especially as far as a cop trying to stop evidence or conviction. maybe you can tell me. Either way both will have no case to answer eventually.

[asiu]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Very valid point in bold

Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?

Yep, picked it in one.

What actually happened? I take it you were there.

You should know; you read and believe.

Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.

Both cases thrown out.

Which case is the hs still dragging up, even though it's a lot older?

When was the last time that the hs mentioned the collingwood rape?

Dont know. Cant remember the cops looking into that case though especially as far as a cop trying to stop evidence or conviction. maybe you can tell me. Either way both will have no case to answer eventually.

what nice patterns

[Johnny Member]

Dont know. Cant remember the cops looking into that case though

And you memory is based on what?

What you read in the Herald-Sun?


Just becuase they do or don't print it, doesn't mean it did or didn't happen.

[Thinline]

Interesting this surfaces again after rumblings that a Pie or two will be outed by the skank...

[ralphsmith]

Good point.

[Thinline]

If I recall correctly that's what happened when Beams and McCarthy got themselves in trouble...

Hey. Probably just coincidence....

[AnythingsPossibleSaints]

I hope he is found not guilty again.

I know the righteous ones on here want the truth and justice, but I just want it to go away....

f****** gutless and sad.
What if it was someone in your family who believed they'd been raped, as a matter of interest? Would you be happy to say "screw truth and justice" and be hoping it would "just go away"?
Sad.

[satchmo]

I hope he is found not guilty again.

I know the righteous ones on here want the truth and justice, but I just want it to go away....

f****** gutless and sad.
What if it was someone in your family who believed they'd been raped, as a matter of interest? Would you be happy to say "screw truth and justice" and be hoping it would "just go away"?
Sad.

f****** gutless and sad & hypothetical.

There was a thorough investigation and no charges were laid. The rest is muckraking by the finest purveyors of the art.

[Moods]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Really? What is sexual misconduct? Never heard of that charge before in my life. It wasn't an AFL investigation it was a police investigation, and he was investigated for rape and had no case to answer in the end. As for the Collingwood allegation. What do you know? I'm tipping you know absolutely nothing other than what you have heard.

[matrix]

[satchmo]

They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.

None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.

They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.

Really? What is sexual misconduct? Never heard of that charge before in my life. It wasn't an AFL investigation it was a police investigation, and he was investigated for rape and had no case to answer in the end. As for the Collingwood allegation. What do you know? I'm tipping you know absolutely nothing other than what you have heard.

Milne wasn't accused of rape, so it wasn't a rape investigation. There was never a suggestion that force was used. Of course if you read the hs you wouldn't have read that.

I'm tipping that you need help with your tipping.