Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Thinline wrote:I'm reminded of that Peter Hoare dude. The serial pest.
Aptly named in the circumstances.
Peter Hoare definitely cost us a World Cup berth ! That game at the MCG v Iran in '97. We were up 2-0 and he started cutting the goal net. Stopped the game and we lost momentum.
I was there and will always hate the guy.
Likewise this little bint has caused a lot of people grief...now she's desperate to stay in the public eye.
BTW she's pretty ordinary looking actually.
I reckon she's bluffing anyway.
She's had it pretty easy from the media until now. I think she's about to find out what it's like to be targeted by the media.
She'll probably still do a shoot for ZOO magazine, then be forgotten.
In honour of those who went before, in the dark and desperate years.
The Footy Show made zero reference of her tonight in relation to the matter,on purpose I'm tipping. Finally they're starting to click that giving her no spotlight is the way to go
One question bothers me. Given all of the video/photos that KD has produced, why isn't there a single frame that has both of them in it together? Surely that was the money shot, but it isn't there.
At one point the HS photoshopped a Nixon and KD pic, so even they knew that is what is needed.
I don't know how she got the shots she did, but if her story is true, how come there is not one pic of them together?
Kate wrote:One question bothers me. Given all of the video/photos that KD has produced, why isn't there a single frame that has both of them in it together? Surely that was the money shot, but it isn't there.
At one point the HS photoshopped a Nixon and KD pic, so even they knew that is what is needed.
I don't know how she got the shots she did, but if her story is true, how come there is not one pic of them together?
Pretty hard to do when you are taking this without the other person's knowledge.
Kate wrote:One question bothers me. Given all of the video/photos that KD has produced, why isn't there a single frame that has both of them in it together? Surely that was the money shot, but it isn't there.
At one point the HS photoshopped a Nixon and KD pic, so even they knew that is what is needed.
I don't know how she got the shots she did, but if her story is true, how come there is not one pic of them together?
Pretty hard to do when you are taking this without the other person's knowledge.
Maybe, but I see Kate's point.
From what I have seen, both the RN vid and the KD vid appear to have been taken by a phone perched on a bench or something. I mean, she didn't hold the camera to film herself in the room.
If that's the case, surely she could have jumped on the bed with him at some stage
Kate wrote:One question bothers me. Given all of the video/photos that KD has produced, why isn't there a single frame that has both of them in it together? Surely that was the money shot, but it isn't there.
At one point the HS photoshopped a Nixon and KD pic, so even they knew that is what is needed.
I don't know how she got the shots she did, but if her story is true, how come there is not one pic of them together?
Pretty hard to do when you are taking this without the other person's knowledge.
Maybe, but I see Kate's point.
From what I have seen, both the RN vid and the KD vid appear to have been taken by a phone perched on a bench or something. I mean, she didn't hold the camera to film herself in the room.
If that's the case, surely she could have jumped on the bed with him at some stage
Id be pretty sure they were together otherwise it means all she said in lies so why suspend him. As i have said previously wouldnt trust either and dont believe a word either say and they actually deserve each other.
jonesy wrote:I wonder what 60 minutes thinks of bugs bunny on the prowl again after her 'I'm moving on with my life now' interview that they paid for
They would think she is great - monster rating and selling products is all they are interested in.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
How come the Herald Sun still won't name her, or show her photo, when she was named on the TV news last night and this morning and they also showed her face, when interviewing here?
It was weird to finally see her mug.
I guess it was pretty easy for Gilbert to believe she was older than she said. If I had to guess here age, without having prior knowledge of it, I'd probably guess anything between about 17 and 21.
AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:How come the Herald Sun still won't name her, or show her photo, when she was named on the TV news last night and this morning and they also showed her face, when interviewing here?
It was weird to finally see her mug.
I guess it was pretty easy for Gilbert to believe she was older than she said. If I had to guess here age, without having prior knowledge of it, I'd probably guess anything between about 17 and 21.
Because it gives them an extremely tiny morsel of moral standing by claiming that we only have her welfare at heart and that's why we won’t identify her.
I feel sorry for what the Herald Sun have done to Ricky Nixon.
I was reading elsewhere that when the HS did the live cross to the Nixon press conference, journo's could be heard discussing two pictures on her phone.
SainterK wrote:I was reading elsewhere that when the HS did the live cross to the Nixon press conference, journo's could be heard discussing two pictures on her phone.
That is why Sensaintsaional.
I've got pictures on my phone too. Doesn't make me worthy of a comment on news broadcasts.
She is an irrelevance and should be treated as such.
SainterK wrote:I was reading elsewhere that when the HS did the live cross to the Nixon press conference, journo's could be heard discussing two pictures on her phone.
That is why Sensaintsaional.
I've got pictures on my phone too. Doesn't make me worthy of a comment on news broadcasts.
She is an irrelevance and should be treated as such.
Yes, I meant the fact the journo's think it's deliriously exciting she has more, hence why it continues.
SainterK wrote:I was reading elsewhere that when the HS did the live cross to the Nixon press conference, journo's could be heard discussing two pictures on her phone.
That is why Sensaintsaional.
I've got pictures on my phone too. Doesn't make me worthy of a comment on news broadcasts.
She is an irrelevance and should be treated as such.
Yes, I meant the fact the journo's think it's deliriously exciting she has more, hence why it continues.
SainterK wrote:I was reading elsewhere that when the HS did the live cross to the Nixon press conference, journo's could be heard discussing two pictures on her phone.
That is why Sensaintsaional.
I've got pictures on my phone too. Doesn't make me worthy of a comment on news broadcasts.
She is an irrelevance and should be treated as such.
Yes, I meant the fact the journo's think it's deliriously exciting she has more, hence why it continues.
Yep. Exactly. Tools.
Could also be because Charlie Sheen, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton et al don’t live here in Melbourne.
I mean, once you get past Matthew Newton what have you got left to try and get you that big, juicy, gossipy headline
jonesy wrote:The Footy Show made zero reference of her tonight in relation to the matter,on purpose I'm tipping. Finally they're starting to click that giving her no spotlight is the way to go
More likely Eddie knows she's now gunning for Collingwood.
dirt on barks
