BackFromUSA wrote:Caro writes:
"Everyone seems to accept that the two St Kilda footballers did not know the girl they had sex with was 16 or that they had spent time with her at a club community visit. But both those facts remain, nonetheless."
Is she implying that it is FACT that they knew she was 16 (how would Caro know that as fact?) and FACT that the players spent time with her at a club community visit?
Or is this cleverly word to take a bet each way i.e. the fact are she is 16 and she was at the club community visit by the players (along with dozens of others) and during that time the players as FACT would have spent some time (a few seconds / few minutes?) with her as they would have with all attendees?
What Caro continues to ignore is:
* the players deny even remembering her from that club visit
* KD agrees that they spent no meaningful time together at the club visit
* KD agrees they did not exchange numbers or contacts at the club visit
* KD admits to being "impressed with Sam Gilbert speaking" at the visiit
* A police investigation CLEARED the players of any wrongdoing at all
* KD travelled to Sydney with intent of finding them after the Swans game
* KD met up with them in a LICENSED venue where minimum age is 18
* KD told them that she was 19 and training with the AIS
* Either way ... it is NOT ILLEGAL to sleep with a 16 year old female
* Slept with one player and then days later started dating the other
* Then stole private files from that players computer when dating him
... and we all know the breach of privacy and multitude of lies after she was dumped by that player when he discovered her lies re her age and monogomy
In summary - Caro seems to be clutching at straws to justify her previous position ... a word of advice Caro if you are listening ... don't hang on too long ... or given her track record, she might bring your credibility down (further) in her web of lies and her history of manufactured evidence to support her claims
very well put!!
and this point about "spending time with her " at the club visit is a complete distortion of the facts in terms of its implication
As too all the previous media statements wording that KID "met" the players at the school visit ....absolute crapolla
The FACTS are that it was a motivational speech given to a large audience of students of which she was merely part thereof and not a footy clinic which may involve closer one on one contact with the players involved
Wilson has had to distort the facts and imply something false, and if that's all the pathetic excuse for a journo can come up in defence of her egg plastered face then she really needed not to have bothered!
When analysed in this manner the is no substance whatever to her statement , including the fact that everyone
accepts the fact that the
player not payers who had sex with her didn't know she was 16(and correct me if I'm wrong here but I thought it was only Gilbo unless she is referring to Collingwood players as well)
The only
fact out of this that really
remains is that the
motivation for KIDs subsequent deceitful behavior stemmed from her being in that audience