80+ cops accessed 17 yr old's file
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Victoria Police says an ethical standards inquiry has found that widespread checks on the file of the teenage girl at the centre of the St Kilda nude photo scandal, were justifiable.
At least 80 police are said to have accessed the file.
The Deputy Commissioner Keiran Walshe says the inquiry is still continuing, but 80 requested background checks have been cleared as legitimate and necessary activities.
"This young individual has had a considerable amount of contact with police over recent times and with a large number of police over recent times," he told ABC Local Radio.
"In the administrative processes that we have to do, our members are entitled to do background checks."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011 ... =melbourne
At least 80 police are said to have accessed the file.
The Deputy Commissioner Keiran Walshe says the inquiry is still continuing, but 80 requested background checks have been cleared as legitimate and necessary activities.
"This young individual has had a considerable amount of contact with police over recent times and with a large number of police over recent times," he told ABC Local Radio.
"In the administrative processes that we have to do, our members are entitled to do background checks."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011 ... =melbourne
- Waltzing St Kilda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2010 5:20am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 364 times
- starsign
- Club Player
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008 8:45am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
SainterK wrote:Victoria Police says an ethical standards inquiry has found that widespread checks on the file of the teenage girl at the centre of the St Kilda nude photo scandal, were justifiable.
At least 80 police are said to have accessed the file.
The Deputy Commissioner Keiran Walshe says the inquiry is still continuing, but 80 requested background checks have been cleared as legitimate and necessary activities.
"This young individual has had a considerable amount of contact with police over recent times and with a large number of police over recent times," he told ABC Local Radio.
"In the administrative processes that we have to do, our members are entitled to do background checks."
yep she's been a hot item and flavour of the month for many no doubt
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011 ... =melbourne
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
God, Eddy's good isn't he?plugger66 wrote:Never heard about it or read about it.Mr Magic wrote:Not the girl in South Melbourne - she was a 20+ university student.plugger66 wrote:If you're talking after the GF it was a different girl for sure.Mr Magic wrote:Not according to the reports at the time - same girl.plugger66 wrote:[Probably because it was a different girl and have since been cleared.
The one I'm talking about was with the Collingwood players at Eve Nightclub (according to media reports) and she subsequently made a police report (a couple of days later) after the South Melbourne incident was reported widely.
Yes, it was Collingwood player implicated in the original pregnancy claim months prior to the GF, as well as our own players...at the time it was said she had a thing for Queensland players! Put 2 and 2 together.
Seems to have dropped off the radar, understandably.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Yes it has.degruch wrote:God, Eddy's good isn't he?plugger66 wrote:Never heard about it or read about it.Mr Magic wrote:Not the girl in South Melbourne - she was a 20+ university student.plugger66 wrote:If you're talking after the GF it was a different girl for sure.Mr Magic wrote:Not according to the reports at the time - same girl.plugger66 wrote:[Probably because it was a different girl and have since been cleared.
The one I'm talking about was with the Collingwood players at Eve Nightclub (according to media reports) and she subsequently made a police report (a couple of days later) after the South Melbourne incident was reported widely.
Yes, it was Collingwood player implicated in the original pregnancy claim months prior to the GF, as well as our own players...at the time it was said she had a thing for Queensland players! Put 2 and 2 together.
Seems to have dropped off the radar, understandably.
And why would that be?
After all the initial reports of the involvement of a third AFL player, why would there be absolutely no mention of this 'un-named player' in the media?
He was certainly involved in a much longer term relationship with her. Even after the publicity surrounding her age was publicly broadcast.
Why no mention of him?
Why hasn't Hinch been condemning him for his 'relationship' with the girl?
Why is it only Sam Gilbert?
Did the girl not tell Hinch about the third player?
If not, why not?
She was apparently infatuated with Gilbert, whilst being ain a relationship with the third player - that's been no secret.
Why no moral outrage from the media at this AFL player knowingly being in a relationship with a 16 /17 year old girl (pregnant or not)?
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Hinch did mention that there were one or two more players when he almost grudgingly said that he may have been ' over enthusiastic' about climing gilbert was the father when she admitted to other liasons.Mr Magic wrote:Yes it has.
And why would that be?
After all the initial reports of the involvement of a third AFL player, why would there be absolutely no mention of this 'un-named player' in the media?
He was certainly involved in a much longer term relationship with her. Even after the publicity surrounding her age was publicly broadcast.
Why no mention of him?
Why hasn't Hinch been condemning him for his 'relationship' with the girl?
Why is it only Sam Gilbert?
Did the girl not tell Hinch about the third player?
If not, why not?
She was apparently infatuated with Gilbert, whilst being ain a relationship with the third player - that's been no secret.
Why no moral outrage from the media at this AFL player knowingly being in a relationship with a 16 /17 year old girl (pregnant or not)?
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Hinch did mention that there were one or two more players when he almost grudgingly said that he may have been ' over enthusiastic' about climing gilbert was the father when she admitted to other liasons.Mr Magic wrote:Yes it has.
And why would that be?
After all the initial reports of the involvement of a third AFL player, why would there be absolutely no mention of this 'un-named player' in the media?
He was certainly involved in a much longer term relationship with her. Even after the publicity surrounding her age was publicly broadcast.
Why no mention of him?
Why hasn't Hinch been condemning him for his 'relationship' with the girl?
Why is it only Sam Gilbert?
Did the girl not tell Hinch about the third player?
If not, why not?
She was apparently infatuated with Gilbert, whilst being ain a relationship with the third player - that's been no secret.
Why no moral outrage from the media at this AFL player knowingly being in a relationship with a 16 /17 year old girl (pregnant or not)?
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Hmmm...maybe because there were about 800 possibilities and no concrete clues as to who the other player(s) could be? OK, we've all seen the mail saying it was a particular Collingwood player, but honestly, with that 'little ray of sunshine' it could have been anyone from anywhere. The media already had Sam Gilbert tagged, why bother focusing on others?Mr Magic wrote:After all the initial reports of the involvement of a third AFL player, why would there be absolutely no mention of this 'un-named player' in the media?
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times