MEDIA CLEAR THE AIR?

Sun 06 Mar 2011 10:32pm

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/girl- ... 1bjoc.html

suddenly becomes the heaqdline ... "Saints teen: pregnancy lie"

Finally a step in tthe right direction but so far Herald Sun yet to highlight the lie ... too busy roasting Nixon based on evidence presented by this liar ... he may in fact be guilty BUT isn't about time they highlight her lies that have impacted on our club?

How about a headline ... SAINT WAS INNOCENT ... to clear Sam's name?

Sun 06 Mar 2011 10:58pm

and now The Age has updated the story angle and the headline matches the content!

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 1bjly.html

chook23 · Post: # 1046360Post **chook23** » Sun 06 Mar 2011 11:20pm

Anthony Dowsley still writing his dribble amongst some apparent facts

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/st-kil ... 6016710975

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victor ... 6016820342

Helio · Post: # 1046361Post **Helio** » Sun 06 Mar 2011 11:28pm

BackFromUSA wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/girl- ... 1bjoc.html

suddenly becomes the heaqdline ... "Saints teen: pregnancy lie"

Finally a step in tthe right direction but so far Herald Sun yet to highlight the lie ... too busy roasting Nixon based on evidence presented by this liar ... he may in fact be guilty BUT isn't about time they highlight her lies that have impacted on our club?

How about a headline ... SAINT WAS INNOCENT ... to clear Sam's name?

There is no issue of guilt or innocence because the age of consent in Victoria is 16.

chook23 · Post: # 1046362Post **chook23** » Sun 06 Mar 2011 11:31pm

Helio wrote:
BackFromUSA wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/girl- ... 1bjoc.html

suddenly becomes the heaqdline ... "Saints teen: pregnancy lie"

Finally a step in tthe right direction but so far Herald Sun yet to highlight the lie ... too busy roasting Nixon based on evidence presented by this liar ... he may in fact be guilty BUT isn't about time they highlight her lies that have impacted on our club?

How about a headline ... SAINT WAS INNOCENT ... to clear Sam's name?
There is no issue of guilt or innocence because the age of consent in Victoria is 16.

I think it was meant in relation to the fact that many bucketed Gilbert because he dumped once he thought she was pregnant

Moccha · Post: # 1046364Post **Moccha** » Sun 06 Mar 2011 11:59pm

Let's wait and see what Derryn "I haven't got a f****** clue so I'll make it up"Hinch says on his program tomorrow.

philtee · Post: # 1046366Post **philtee** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:09am

Headlines I'd like to see -

"Dowsley admits : I forgot to ask the obvious questions".
"Caro confesses : Yep, I fell for it, hook line and sinker".
"Hinch : My judgement is shot, it's time to retire."

And the editorial -
"To the St Kilda Football Club - A sincere apology".

Moccha · Post: # 1046367Post **Moccha** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:15am

I reckon Kim Duthie should get a job in IT

philtee · Post: # 1046369Post **philtee** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:36am

The weirdness continues...the KD story is missing from the 60 Minutes website, but the night's other stories are up. Wonder if Nine's lawyers
made a mistake in clearing the story to go to air?

St Lenny · Post: # 1046449Post **St Lenny** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 10:21am

Now watch the media take the attention of the way they handled the incident by blaming Ricky Nixon, I feel for that guy and dont believe a word of what she has said.

saintbrat · Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:21am

3AW discuss how the sms could be faked
http://www.3aw.com.au/displayPopUpPlaye ... AKFAST.mp3

but she would only have needed the second phone and put in his name rather than phone number-- as someone said.

Dr Spaceman · Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:25am

saintbrat wrote:3AW discuss how the sms could be faked
http://www.3aw.com.au/displayPopUpPlaye ... AKFAST.mp3

but she would only have needed the second phone and put in his name rather than phone number-- as someone said.

But surely a reputable program such as 60 minutes would have checked both the SMSs and the e-mails to ensure they actually came from Nixon.

Surely!

Surely!!!

Hang on

matrix · Post: # 1046494Post **matrix** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:32am

http://fakesend.com/

saintnick12 · Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:36am

Dr Spaceman wrote:
saintbrat wrote:3AW discuss how the sms could be faked
http://www.3aw.com.au/displayPopUpPlaye ... AKFAST.mp3

but she would only have needed the second phone and put in his name rather than phone number-- as someone said.
But surely a reputable program such as 60 minutes would have checked both the SMSs and the e-mails to ensure they actually came from Nixon.

Surely!

Surely!!!

Hang on

I was thinking the same.
Surely those in the media have Ricky's mobile number already. The media always seems to have the mobile numbers they need to get a quick quote or a no comment.

So surely they could just check that number against the number in her phone registered to Ricky, against the number they have for him.
Sure, he could have more than one mobile I guess....

Like the rest of this story, it doesn't seem many facts have been checked along the way.

saintbrat · Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:42am

eddies take's

http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne/sho ... 7-blhx.htm

l

Dr Spaceman · Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:43am

saintnick12 wrote:
Dr Spaceman wrote:
saintbrat wrote:3AW discuss how the sms could be faked
http://www.3aw.com.au/displayPopUpPlaye ... AKFAST.mp3

but she would only have needed the second phone and put in his name rather than phone number-- as someone said.
But surely a reputable program such as 60 minutes would have checked both the SMSs and the e-mails to ensure they actually came from Nixon.

Surely!

Surely!!!

Hang on

I was thinking the same.
Surely those in the media have Ricky's mobile number already. The media always seems to have the mobile numbers they need to get a quick quote or a no comment.

So surely they could just check that number against the number in her phone registered to Ricky, against the number they have for him.
Sure, he could have more than one mobile I guess....

Like the rest of this story, it doesn't seem many facts have been checked along the way.

Message to the admin.

You may want to order a few more crates of

s before this story runs its course.

matrix · Post: # 1046500Post **matrix** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 11:45am

hmmm
that link gives me a 404 file not found

philtee · Post: # 1046511Post **philtee** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:08pm

Anyway, I missed this on Media Watch last week...it's almost old news!
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transc ... 151133.htm

And this info from the HS Editor to Media Watch -
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transc ... telnew.pdf

perfectionist · Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:17pm

philtee wrote:The weirdness continues...the KD story is missing from the 60 Minutes website, but the night's other stories are up. Wonder if Nine's lawyers
made a mistake in clearing the story to go to air?

There is no suppression order any more. I believe that the "legal reasons" relate to a police officer who is alleged to have had sex with the girl who cannot be named. The age of consent in that case would be 18, therefore, the Crimes Act prohibits the naming of the alleged victim. I suppose Nine will argue that the cases are separate and that they did not mention the officer case in the report. Thin ice. But they got their ratings - that's all that matters.

saintbrat · Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:29pm

perfectionist wrote:
philtee wrote:The weirdness continues...the KD story is missing from the 60 Minutes website, but the night's other stories are up. Wonder if Nine's lawyers
made a mistake in clearing the story to go to air?
There is no suppression order any more. I believe that the "legal reasons" relate to a police officer who is alleged to have had sex with the girl who cannot be named. The age of consent in that case would be 18, therefore, the Crimes Act prohibits the naming of the alleged victim. I suppose Nine will argue that the cases are separate and that they did not mention the officer case in the report. Thin ice. But they got their ratings - that's all that matters.

But it was the judge in the Saints case at court Dec last year that surpressed her name...

bergsone · Post: # 1046518Post **bergsone** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:32pm

Would like to ask Liz Hayes a question

Do you after interviewing KD and spending time with her,believe her?

Because she certainly hasnt been truthfull all this time why start now

Cairnsman · Mon 07 Mar 2011 12:59pm

philtee wrote:Headlines I'd like to see -

"Dowsley admits : I forgot to ask the obvious questions".
"Caro confesses : Yep, I fell for it, hook line and sinker".
"Hinch : My judgement is shot, it's time to retire."

And the editorial -
"To the St Kilda Football Club - A sincere apology".

You last headline should be ameded to

"Hinch: My judgement is shot, it time to die"

Thinline · Post: # 1046536Post **Thinline** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 1:07pm

bergsone wrote:Would like to ask Liz Hayes a question

Do you after interviewing KD and spending time with her,believe her?

Because she certainly hasnt been truthfull all this time why start now

Liz Hayes, back in the day of Wendt, was quite pleasant on the eye, but watching her there last night, mug shiny with wrinkle filler, head tilted, nodding on cue, oozing faux empathy, well, I couldn't help but think she now has a head like a scrotum.

There. I said it.

IluvHarvey · Mon 07 Mar 2011 1:10pm

Thinline wrote:
bergsone wrote:Would like to ask Liz Hayes a question

Do you after interviewing KD and spending time with her,believe her?

Because she certainly hasnt been truthfull all this time why start now
Liz Hayes, back in the day of Wendt, was quite pleasant on the eye, but watching her there last night, mug shiny with wrinkle filler, head tilted, nodding on cue, oozing faux empathy, well, I couldn't help but think she now has a head like a scrotum.

There. I said it.

i'm glad we have got to the real issue here.

mullet · Post: # 1046547Post **mullet** » Mon 07 Mar 2011 1:27pm

Thinline wrote:
bergsone wrote:Would like to ask Liz Hayes a question

Do you after interviewing KD and spending time with her,believe her?

Because she certainly hasnt been truthfull all this time why start now
Liz Hayes, back in the day of Wendt, was quite pleasant on the eye, but watching her there last night, mug shiny with wrinkle filler, head tilted, nodding on cue, oozing faux empathy, well, I couldn't help but think she now has a head like a scrotum.

There. I said it.

Liz Hayes exposed KD for what she is. She got her to admit that she made the whole thing up about the pregnancy. She got her to admit that she lied about her age. She got her to admit that she only liked the footballers because of the talk they gave at the school. What she looks like is irelevant. I thought she did a good job and I really dont think that she felt any sympathy for the girl at all. Liz actually outsmarted KD. Some of the questions KD just wouldnt answer or couldnt answer. Geez if they had of sent a bloke to do the interview we may have never of seen him again.

A good journo brings out the facts, and I think Liz did this and you dont need to be pretty to do it.

MEDIA CLEAR THE AIR?

MEDIA CLEAR THE AIR?

Re: MEDIA CLEAR THE AIR?

Re: MEDIA CLEAR THE AIR?