Hinch Article - Group relations

matrix · Post: # 1035868Post **matrix** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 1:04pm

speaking of hinch
check out the twitter box top right of his home page

stupid enough to say something without proof of whatever the rumor is??
or knows its 100% and it will be coming out shortly from the afl??

markp · Post: # 1035870Post **markp** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 1:15pm

matrix wrote:speaking of hinch
check out the twitter box top right of his home page

stupid enough to say something without proof of whatever the rumor is??
or knows its 100% and it will be coming out shortly from the afl??

New AFL club scandal rumours swirling. Itâ€™s not St Kilda.

Made me chuckle... still mentioned the Saints!

DWOODROW · Post: # 1035872Post **DWOODROW** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 1:17pm

Hinch is a wanka,

That's about it really.

matrix · Post: # 1035873Post **matrix** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 1:18pm

yeah
surprised he mentioned it wasnt about the st kilda fc

anyhoo
i guess it gets people listening at around 4pm

SainterK · Post: # 1035874Post **SainterK** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 1:35pm

If Hinch talks about the 'rumour' we think he is going to talk about, then it's another reason to disbelieve it.

matrix · Post: # 1035875Post **matrix** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 1:37pm

lol
more than likely

suss · Post: # 1035876Post **suss** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 2:28pm

SainterK wrote:If Hinch talks about the 'rumour' we think he is going to talk about, then it's another reason to disbelieve it.

I don't believe it. It's too good to be true. The Human Headline would want to be mighty careful with this one...

InkerSaint · Mon 31 Jan 2011 3:31pm

Yep. He went there...

fingers · Post: # 1035881Post **fingers** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 3:33pm

Where?

SainterK · Post: # 1035882Post **SainterK** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 3:35pm

There

http://www.hinch.net/hinch-says-2011/Ja ... -11.1.html

BAM! (shhhh) · Mon 31 Jan 2011 3:52pm

matrix wrote:yeah
surprised he mentioned it wasnt about the st kilda fc

anyhoo
i guess it gets people listening at around 4pm

I'm not. Mentioning it's not about St Kilda is the simplest way to point the noses in the right direction while maintaining plausible deniability. Journalist, editorialist or schoolchild, makes little difference in January 2011.

I recall predicting in the midst of a game (co-incidentally, while while watching the team the rumour mill has targetted) that there would almost need to be an AFL HGH scenatrio, if only so the AFL/Club involved could go in and DISprove.

With ever rising fitness levels, there was bound to be a season where speclation arose.

I believe the salient point of the article is the Dimetriou shows no signs of even being mildly concerned. AFL drug testing rules are so tight in this regard that surely any meaningful speculation could be very quickly disproven. This may well be an opportunity for the AFL to do just that.

stinger · Post: # 1035890Post **stinger** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 4:29pm

to me it only proves that the pr!ck trolls these pages......

Eastern · Post: # 1035898Post **Eastern** » Mon 31 Jan 2011 5:32pm

He did mention COLLINGWOOD & HUMAN GROWTH HORMONES so that is sure to get some people excited !!