NO. Think about the OTHER code !!matrix wrote:hang on
wouldnt it be strike one and nothing happens?
anyway its more than likely bollocks
Has anyone heard any rumours regarding an investigation into
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
pfft - Lance has got the balls to defend himself.SENsaintsational wrote:On an unrelated topic, can people get off Lance Armstrong's back?
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
And also very hard to prove the use of EPO from 1999.joffaboy wrote:pfft - Lance has got the balls to defend himself.SENsaintsational wrote:On an unrelated topic, can people get off Lance Armstrong's back?
Apparently it is much easier to detect this type of doping nowdays but Lances samples have always come up clean.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
And then there is the ongoing sage of Alberto Contador.joffaboy wrote:And also very hard to prove the use of EPO from 1999.joffaboy wrote:pfft - Lance has got the balls to defend himself.SENsaintsational wrote:On an unrelated topic, can people get off Lance Armstrong's back?
Apparently it is much easier to detect this type of doping nowdays but Lances samples have always come up clean.
-
rodkeoghrocks
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon 10 Apr 2006 5:06pm
Interesting paralells to how Flloyd Landis managed to pull an amazing recovery after a taxing ride the day before.SENsaintsational wrote:And then there is the ongoing sage of Alberto Contador.joffaboy wrote:And also very hard to prove the use of EPO from 1999.joffaboy wrote:pfft - Lance has got the balls to defend himself.SENsaintsational wrote:On an unrelated topic, can people get off Lance Armstrong's back?
Apparently it is much easier to detect this type of doping nowdays but Lances samples have always come up clean.
EPO certainly goes someway to assisting in recovery !
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10514
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1345 times
Yes very true.rodkeoghrocks wrote:Interesting paralells to how Flloyd Landis managed to pull an amazing recovery after a taxing ride the day before.SENsaintsational wrote:And then there is the ongoing sage of Alberto Contador.joffaboy wrote:And also very hard to prove the use of EPO from 1999.joffaboy wrote:pfft - Lance has got the balls to defend himself.SENsaintsational wrote:On an unrelated topic, can people get off Lance Armstrong's back?
Apparently it is much easier to detect this type of doping nowdays but Lances samples have always come up clean.
EPO certainly goes someway to assisting in recovery !
Thats why it is so looked down upon in cycling.
Amazing how Floyd went from down and out one day to world beater the next.
The recovery from the previous gruelling contest was too good to be true apparently.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
or testeDWOODROW wrote:Shouldn't it be Testie.SENsaintsational wrote:Not quite so sure about that.joffaboy wrote:pfft - Lance has got the balls to defend himself.SENsaintsational wrote:On an unrelated topic, can people get off Lance Armstrong's back?
He sure gets testy about all the rumours about him though.
I'm livin' in a madhouse
-
InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
