Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
What I don't understand is this stupid girl eluded on her twiiter in mid November that she had these photos. One 'tweet' was addresed to Zac and the other to the football club. She basically said that she was going to do what she eventually ended up doing today. If this is the case why has this been allowed to get to this point. She should have been stopped before it got this far.
Last edited by saintharvs on Mon 20 Dec 2010 10:59pm, edited 1 time in total.
"UPDATE 8.20pm: THE girl at the centre of the St Kilda nude photo scandal has been ordered by the Federal Court of Melbourne to stop publishing the images....."
Yes, but the problem I am seeing now is that the pictures are uploaded onto public photo sites similar to imageshack. And other people are just posting the links. The attention whore who started this is just standing on the curb giggling whilst others post the links.
No court can control the photos now, and I doubt they can empower overseas servers that have the photos readily on display like Imgur.
Fair comments SirDog.
However her Twitter account makes it quite clear she has utilised her friend's FB page to continue her pursuit after her own FB page was shut down.
She knows exactly what she's doing and that would be of interest to the Federal Court!
saint75 wrote:
To claim that this will cost Nick his captaincy is ridiculous!
IMHO Nick is gone as captain. He has lost too much credibility.The club will have to work really hard now to find a new sponsor.
How can our club keep on having this sort of thing happen.
Someone tell me what he has done wrong???????
Brand, image....
This is bigger than Nick, and a silly photo.
Come off it!!! Seriously, you think so over a a photo of someone naked? We are in serious trouble then if your reasoning is to be believed as there are *apparently* still 19 other photos. Seems we may not have a captain next year if we were to follow your logic.
It's an opinion!
I don't speak for the club, which is why I use words like opinion, IMO, I think....
and no it's not about Nick being naked, it's about the club being involved in another scandal, or can we laugh the frequency of that happening away as well?
As I mentioned earlier, the photo's are allegedy of other players from other clubs, whatever....
ralphsmith wrote:A rugby league player lost his job over a lewd picture of him with a dog.
What if she has similar pictures. WHAT IF.
Think of the children. Why won't someone think of the children.
Of course the acolytes will still cry 'what has he done wrong' all hail the infallible football club.
/bows to effigy
If any player is caught with an animal they deserve what they get. However this photo is 2 players and 2 players only. The girl isn't even in question in regards to where the photo was taken or in what context, as she obtained them illegally!
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
ralphsmith wrote:A rugby league player lost his job over a lewd picture of him with a dog.
What if she has similar pictures. WHAT IF.
Think of the children. Why won't someone think of the children.
Of course the acolytes will still cry 'what has he done wrong' all hail the infallible football club.
/bows to effigy
What the hell are you on about? What if she has photo's of Roo committing a burglary? What about committing a stick-up? What if what if what if
Why don't we stick with the facts. there was no dog. Until a dog appears let's worry about that then. I'm telling you this will blow over, and in a couple of months time it will be nothing more than cause for a snigger in the pub.
SainterK wrote:Why is it becoming increasingly hard to have an opinion on here, just because mine differs from the masses this particular time?
Precious much?
No, you?
Not me!
You confuse being loyal to the players, which even the club would be, with the fact it's big business these days.
The club is trying to negotiate a new sponsor, do you understand this?
Are you trying to tell me that the club would not be concerned, the existing sponsors wouldn't be making noises, that there would be no embarrasment from the powers that be that this story has broken when trying to negotiate a new 'major' one?
Don't confuse me voicing what I think the club will do in this situation, with a lack of loyalty.
Lets think of the positives.... It couldn't have happened at a better time. If this shite storm happened going into a finals campaign it could be catastrophic. Best to get it out of the way now. And who knows, it could be galvanising for the team. Bring on 2011!
doppler effect wrote:Lets think of the positives.... It couldn't have happened at a better time. If this shite storm happened going into a finals campaign it could be catastrophic. Best to get it out of the way now. And who knows, it could be galvanising for the team. Bring on 2011!
I know,it may cost us a premiership loss if it happened in September...ah wait