You have an excellent memory!Sobraz wrote:I recall Raph always wanted the number 8... When he arrived and Max obviously held the number, I remember reading an article where he said he was happy with 16 cos it's twice 8... Finally got his wish... This is his year to step up...
Player Numbers 2011
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Is it really wierd Siposs was given 2?
Ledger was selected before him and seems to have been given the short end of the stick.
Also in all seriousness, and I felt the same about the scully/trengove situation... Id be seriously pissed off being given 31/35 when the bloke running second got to get a single digit!
Also dunno about Raph changing numbers. Unless it has some serious significance - dont know why you wouldnt try and make a number your own, especially a good footy number like 16.
Ledger was selected before him and seems to have been given the short end of the stick.
Also in all seriousness, and I felt the same about the scully/trengove situation... Id be seriously pissed off being given 31/35 when the bloke running second got to get a single digit!
Also dunno about Raph changing numbers. Unless it has some serious significance - dont know why you wouldnt try and make a number your own, especially a good footy number like 16.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
So what happens if Cripps is a dud like most of our recent draft picks?
Look, I hope he isn't and he's a gun, but the number 35 is a sacred site at Moorabbin, and should be given to a proven player not a maybe IMO.....
Look, I hope he isn't and he's a gun, but the number 35 is a sacred site at Moorabbin, and should be given to a proven player not a maybe IMO.....
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Agree re Raph.Spinner wrote:Is it really wierd Siposs was given 2?
Ledger was selected before him and seems to have been given the short end of the stick.
Also in all seriousness, and I felt the same about the scully/trengove situation... Id be seriously pissed off being given 31/35 when the bloke running second got to get a single digit!
Also dunno about Raph changing numbers. Unless it has some serious significance - dont know why you wouldnt try and make a number your own, especially a good footy number like 16.
Apparently 8 was his number before he was recruited however he's about to start his 8th season at the Saints.
I would have thought the moment had passed but each to their own I suppose
The future is the future....we can't predict it but sometimes it doesn't hurt to show a little faith in a player. I think the man that has the biggest say in this already has. Besides you can't give a player a famous number after they've made it... that is entirely arse up.So what happens if Cripps is a dud like most of our recent draft picks?
Look, I hope he isn't and he's a gun, but the number 35 is a sacred site at Moorabbin, and should be given to a proven player not a maybe IMO.....
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
Who is under more pressure of expectation, Cripps or Winmar?PJ wrote:The future is the future....we can't predict it but sometimes it doesn't hurt to show a little faith in a player. I think the man that has the biggest say in this already has. Besides you can't give a player a famous number after they've made it... that is entirely arse up.So what happens if Cripps is a dud like most of our recent draft picks?
Look, I hope he isn't and he's a gun, but the number 35 is a sacred site at Moorabbin, and should be given to a proven player not a maybe IMO.....
Much harder to live up to a famous name, than a number on a jumper IMO.
Nick certainly has the harder task but I would imagine that the coaches and club would be going out of their way to down play it - especially Mr unflapable, can you find a pulse" Lyon. The hype comes from the media so as long as they keep their heads out of the papers. The other take you could have on this is that some players rise to a challenge and these 2 could roll all before them.Who is under more pressure of expectation, Cripps or Winmar?
Much harder to live up to a famous name, than a number on a jumper IMO.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
Neither.SainterK wrote:Who is under more pressure of expectation, Cripps or Winmar?PJ wrote:The future is the future....we can't predict it but sometimes it doesn't hurt to show a little faith in a player. I think the man that has the biggest say in this already has. Besides you can't give a player a famous number after they've made it... that is entirely arse up.So what happens if Cripps is a dud like most of our recent draft picks?
Look, I hope he isn't and he's a gun, but the number 35 is a sacred site at Moorabbin, and should be given to a proven player not a maybe IMO.....
Much harder to live up to a famous name, than a number on a jumper IMO.
Winmar is not Cuz's son remember, he's a cousin.....so it's a lower expectation.
As for Cripps, all I think of is a severly buggered hammy that ruined what should've been an excellent career.
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
#35 may well be sacred but we shouldn’t get hung up about it. I really, really hope Cripps is a gun, but because I want us to have another gun, not because he’s wearing Banger’s jumper.saintspremiers wrote:So what happens if Cripps is a dud like most of our recent draft picks?
Look, I hope he isn't and he's a gun, but the number 35 is a sacred site at Moorabbin, and should be given to a proven player not a maybe IMO.....
Just like we needed to move on when plugger left, just like we need to move on from the GF losses, we really need to move on from the "horror" of seeing someone else wearing a past champion’s jumper! There are bigger issues we need to deal with!
IMO of course
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11242
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
I was trying (rather unsuccessfully) to say that I think the expectation of a surname is far more pressure than that of a number.PJ wrote:As for Cripps, all I think of is a severly buggered hammy that ruined what should've been an excellent career.
I think SainterK meant the expectation of wearing 35.
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Correct! Im so happy to see them all used.Bernard Shakey wrote:Really happy to see that numbers are just that, numbers.
One to whatever, no gaps, they are just numbers.
And this crapola about saving 35 for a definate gun player.
Players get a number, 90% try and make it their own. By the time a player is a definate gun - they most likely will not want to change numbers.
And lets be honest - 35 aint too sexy.
No expectation Cripps. You wear the jumper, it doesnt wear you.
Good callSpinner wrote:Correct! Im so happy to see them all used.Bernard Shakey wrote:Really happy to see that numbers are just that, numbers.
One to whatever, no gaps, they are just numbers.
And this crapola about saving 35 for a definate gun player.
Players get a number, 90% try and make it their own. By the time a player is a definate gun - they most likely will not want to change numbers.
And lets be honest - 35 aint too sexy.
No expectation Cripps. You wear the jumper, it doesnt wear you.
Maybe this year?