Does the gap widen ? ......

saintbrat · Post: # 1016812Post **saintbrat** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 6:51pm

2 weeks down
only 49 to go.....

plugger66 · Post: # 1016814Post **plugger66** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:01pm

saintbrat wrote:2 weeks down
only 49 to go.....

Pretty sure that would be 50 to go.

saintbrat · Post: # 1016819Post **saintbrat** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:26pm

no it wouldn't we played an extra week

3rd generation saint · Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:39pm

If Jolly goes down next year, the filth will struggle big time as they don't have any replacement ruckmen.

Brisvegas saint · Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:42pm

3rd generation saint wrote:If Jolly goes down next year, the filth will struggle big time as they don't have any replacement ruckmen.

Yep, definitely the most important pies player in terms of replaceability.

kosifantutti23 · Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:46pm

johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:
Brisvegas saint wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:What gap?

The Grand Final was a draw.
The replay was a better reflection of where the two sides were at by the end of the year.
Why?

If Lenny's kick had bounced through or into Milne's hands and we'd hung on to win would you have posted here that we were not worthy winners?

The draw was a fluke. The two sides were very evenly matched on the last Saturday in September. Collingwood was by far the better side in the fifth week of the finals but who plans for that?
Neither us, neither you. What's your point?

Point 1. Py$$ off troll.

Point 2. There is no us and you on this board there is only us. See point 1

Point 3. My point was that there was no gap between us and them on Grand Final day. so see Point 1.

Point 4. See point 1.

plugger66 · Post: # 1016832Post **plugger66** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:47pm

saintbrat wrote:no it wouldn't we played an extra week

Why does that matter?

Brisvegas saint · Sun 17 Oct 2010 7:51pm

johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:
Brisvegas saint wrote:
kosifantutti23 wrote:What gap?

The Grand Final was a draw.
The replay was a better reflection of where the two sides were at by the end of the year.
Why?

If Lenny's kick had bounced through or into Milne's hands and we'd hung on to win would you have posted here that we were not worthy winners?

The draw was a fluke. The two sides were very evenly matched on the last Saturday in September. Collingwood was by far the better side in the fifth week of the finals but who plans for that?
Neither us, neither you. What's your point?

Bugger off you glory hunting filth fan. That's all filth supporters are: glory hunters. Just like Man U fans...

groupie1 · Post: # 1016866Post **groupie1** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 8:50pm

Has anybody discussed the Tarrant-Buckley issue? It must raise concerns. Was it Malthouse's way to hold on? Strange decision on both Tarrant and Collingwood's part. What do people think?

SainterK · Post: # 1016870Post **SainterK** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 8:59pm

plugger66 wrote:
saintbrat wrote:no it wouldn't we played an extra week
Why does that matter?

Why does what matter?

hungry for a premiership · Sun 17 Oct 2010 9:10pm

Hindsight makes things easy for the feeble-minded, doesn't it?

Brisvegas saint · Sun 17 Oct 2010 9:12pm

hungry for a premiership wrote:Hindsight makes things easy for the feeble-minded, doesn't it?

I guess?

saintspremiers · Sun 17 Oct 2010 9:42pm

SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
saintbrat wrote:no it wouldn't we played an extra week
Why does that matter?
Why does what matter?

Does anything matter?

Dr Spaceman · Sun 17 Oct 2010 10:11pm

saintspremiers wrote:
SainterK wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
saintbrat wrote:no it wouldn't we played an extra week
Why does that matter?
Why does what matter?
Does anything matter?

Moods · Post: # 1016916Post **Moods** » Sun 17 Oct 2010 10:48pm

groupie1 wrote:Has anybody discussed the Tarrant-Buckley issue? It must raise concerns. Was it Malthouse's way to hold on? Strange decision on both Tarrant and Collingwood's part. What do people think?

Care to expand? Am I missing something?