Teams for GF replay

Mr Magic · Post: # 1005222Post **Mr Magic** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:26pm

saintsRrising wrote:Bakes could go to Daisy.

Or to Didak with Dempster to Daisy.

Might take a rotation on Swan as well. Expect Ray to have first crack though.

Or Beames/Sidebottom/Blair if they play forward?

AnythingsPossibleSaints · Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:28pm

saintsRrising wrote:
busso mick wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Go big Ben.

Congrats young man and well earned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+1 for the young fella. If he was a racehorse his owners would be delighted - 26 wins and a tie from 30 starts. Certainly a lucky charm for us.
With Ben you will know he will bust a gut.

Let's all hope that he has a fairtytale game to announce himself as our new and ongoing No 1 ruck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+1 Go Macca!

saintspremiers · Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:28pm

Thinline wrote:
#1GILL wrote:Interesting that Ross has opted for Armo has emergancy rather than Steven despite offering Steven's name up during the week.

Is Armo a genuine chance to come in, or is this a last minute attempt to make Armo feel parcially wanted and Ross hoping that he won't request a trade?
Weather insurance I'm guessing.

huh?

as in rain you mean?

Forecast is for 22 and fine - 2 days out it is fairly accurate normally.

With no rain forecast until Monday, rain sounds very unlikely.

terry smith rules · Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:31pm

saintsRrising wrote:

Eddy...time to redeem yourself!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry take great offence at that

Redeem for what

That he is young and played only a handful of games

Cut him some slack ffs.

Yes he had a very public holding the ball but in a game with lots of pressure and other errors does he deserve anymore criticism thna others

No

Support your team

mordi · Post: # 1005239Post **mordi** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:34pm

Thinline wrote:What is it that Goldsack's meant to do?

Tag?

Defend?

Run around uncertain?

be the source of many jokes.........

bergholt · Post: # 1005241Post **bergholt** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:35pm

Thinline wrote:What is it that Goldsack's meant to do?

Tag?

Defend?

Run around uncertain?

go to goddard, i reckon. he's a big kid who can run a bit, couldn't stay with bj all day but could make a good fist of him when he goes forward.

saintspremiers · Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:36pm

terry smith rules wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:

Eddy...time to redeem yourself!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry take great offence at that

Redeem for what

That he is young and played only a handful of games

Cut him some slack ffs.

Yes he had a very public holding the ball but in a game with lots of pressure and other errors does he deserve anymore criticism thna others

No

Support your team

agree.

I haven't been the biggest Eddy fan, but have warmed to him immensly recently.

He is a tackling machine, and given his lower profile, may be able to tackle hard again this week, as he won't be as sore as some of our targetted stars may be.

AnythingsPossibleSaints · Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:37pm

mordi wrote:
Thinline wrote:What is it that Goldsack's meant to do?

Tag?

Defend?

Run around uncertain?
be the source of many jokes.........

That, plus play on Goddard. Apparently he's the ideal match-up for BJ, physically. Interesting that Leon isn't even named on the emergency list. That'll teach him. No fourth time lucky.

lefty · Post: # 1005254Post **lefty** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:40pm

Dam, armo not in.. however, you never know, I hope he gets to play and Ross makes a late change... I think Eddy was lucky, he is attacking the ball much better than last year though, but really didn't do enough imo, four tackles not good enough if that's really his only job (pressure).

bigcarl · Post: # 1005265Post **bigcarl** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:46pm

Go get 'em Big Ben. Collingwood know very little about you so give them a nasty surprise.

StPeter · Post: # 1005267Post **StPeter** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:47pm

Eddy very very fortunate!

SaintSimmo · Thu 30 Sep 2010 6:56pm

StPeter wrote:Eddy very very fortunate!

Agreed. Would have liked to have seen little Jacky Steven play in the forward line.

Sobraz · Post: # 1005287Post **Sobraz** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 7:07pm

Get the feeling the Pies have made a change as a reaction to us, thus changing their natural plan... Goldsack (or someone) will tag BJ, which goes against the way they've played all year...

This works well for us... Sure, we aren't going in with 2 set rucks, as we have for most of the year (I feared incorrectly this would hurt us last week), but we are keeping the same structure that we had last week, and this should work in our favour...

starsign · Post: # 1005296Post **starsign** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 7:16pm

Sobraz wrote:No King....

No Joe King!!

saintrod · Post: # 1005385Post **saintrod** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 9:24pm

Thinline wrote:
What is it that Goldsack's meant to do?

Tag?

Defend?

Run around uncertain?

IMO Goldsack will play defensive forward on Fisher [/b][/quote]

mohannair · Post: # 1005388Post **mohannair** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 9:32pm

sainterinsydney wrote:Does anyone think a late change? Preety much how it was predicted.

My gut feeling is that Gram may be a late change with Geary in.

mohannair · Post: # 1005389Post **mohannair** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 9:34pm

3rd generation saint wrote:So who does Bakes take now that one of his bitches has been dropped.

Didak

plugger66 · Post: # 1005407Post **plugger66** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 9:55pm

mohannair wrote:
3rd generation saint wrote:So who does Bakes take now that one of his bitches has been dropped.
Didak

No. Sidebottom or Beams.

Iceman234 · Post: # 1005410Post **Iceman234** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 9:58pm

Sobraz wrote:Get the feeling the Pies have made a change as a reaction to us, thus changing their natural plan... Goldsack (or someone) will tag BJ, which goes against the way they've played all year...

This works well for us... Sure, we aren't going in with 2 set rucks, as we have for most of the year (I feared incorrectly this would hurt us last week), but we are keeping the same structure that we had last week, and this should work in our favour...

This.

Was surprised to see Shithouse replace a goalsneak forward (who admittedly almost won them the game in the end) with a bloke who many Pies supporters see as a "backman, but he'll run with Goddard" to quote a Pie-mad mate of mine.

Knee-jerk reaction to Goddard, I'm loving it.

They now need to push a mid forward to replace Leon, who was always going to occupy one of our hard small backmen (Bakes)

SainterK · Post: # 1005418Post **SainterK** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 10:03pm

plugger66 wrote:
mohannair wrote:
3rd generation saint wrote:So who does Bakes take now that one of his bitches has been dropped.
Didak
No. Sidebottom or Beams.

Beams is due I reckon, looked pretty bummed with his performance last week...

SainterK · Post: # 1005422Post **SainterK** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 10:05pm

Thinline wrote:What is it that Goldsack's meant to do?

Tag?

Defend?

Run around uncertain?

Torp it?

Bernard Shakey · Thu 30 Sep 2010 10:09pm

SaintSimmo wrote:
StPeter wrote:Eddy very very fortunate!
Agreed. Would have liked to have seen little Jacky Steven play in the forward line.

And what exactly would little Jacky Steven bring to the forward line?

All well and good to like a player, but they need to be able to deliver.

St. Luke · Post: # 1005465Post **St. Luke** » Thu 30 Sep 2010 10:39pm

I'm really rapt for McEvoy!! Big bloke who can take a good mark, kick goals and can ruck!! Very nice!!!

SainterK · Post: # 1005560Post **SainterK** » Fri 01 Oct 2010 1:30am

Hmm, McCarthy an emergency...midfielder isn't he?

#1GILL · Post: # 1005562Post **#1GILL** » Fri 01 Oct 2010 1:34am

SainterK wrote:Hmm, McCarthy an emergency...midfielder isn't he?

Yeah, well atleast he likes to think he's a midfielder. He doesn't get the ball, would love it if he played. Not up to it at all.

EDIT: Actually he seems to spend a lot of time up forward...Either way, he doesn't get the ball

Teams for GF replay

Re: Teams for GF replay

Re: Teams for GF replay