Training today Higgins - no Windhager- Pool Jones - no Collard - yes, forward Crouch - no Macrae - Yes, mid Nas - Yes HB Hill - Laps Steele - no Owens - Yes forward Clark - yes Mid King - no Byrnes - laps Stocker - laps Dow - laps Butler - no Keeler - yes Forward Carroll - laps Marshal - no Howard ...

magnifisaint wrote: ↑Fri 25 Oct 2024 10:43pm I'd like to know the reason he pulled out of the final last year.

Been pretty widely reported that he had a mental health episode the day/night before the game.

So what you’re saying is you haven’t got his GPS numbers? Have you? I was going to just post that simple question above back at you, but I thought I should firstly try and source something. Which I did. You want to imply that McRae's GPS numbers are impressive. Let's have it then. Ohh...and please ...

So he wasn’t a triple AA I think you’ll find Luke Beveridge’s ridiculous coaching has more to do with his drop in output Beveridge is the reason why WB have the second best list and finished 7th His coaching record with an elite list is horrible He is triple AA 19-21. He was then in the squad in 22...

SAINT-LEE wrote: ↑Mon 23 Sep 2024 5:55pm

B.M wrote: ↑Wed 18 Sep 2024 7:12pm Macrae

Would be the only triple AA - D Grade midfielder in my knowledge?!

I like McRae but ya gotta stop calling him a AA player.

He WAS a AA. He hasn't had anything near a AA season in 3 years.

Still an asset but not a AA anymore, not even close.

He was in the AA squad in 2022.

tony74 wrote: ↑Fri 20 Sep 2024 5:04pm Arie has lost 7kgs in the last couple of months and is working on his speed. Will take Bonners spot

Cheers Tony.

Who do you think takes Battle's spot?

Has nominated Saints.

Over on big footy the word is he's going to re-sign.

He had been atrocious this season. Goes back, finds form, into the ones. Makes sense.

ace wrote: ↑Thu 09 May 2024 11:43pm Not sure of the translation
Is it "You are, you are joke" OR simply "you are, you are woke"

He's running laps at Moorabbin apparently.

[flash=][/flash] We are not as good a list as Sydney Explain the logic behind your conclusion, please. We finished above them last year despite having an injury-ravaged list and we beat them the only time we played. On their home deck, no less. There's no doubt Grundy and Adams should bolster their ...

B.M wrote: ↑Wed 07 Feb 2024 4:15pm From today

Got a good idea of the look of the way they will line up

Any surprises?

It's worrying that he's having a second lot of surgery on the same injury. He's vital to us, irreplaceable. If he's back in training in Jan then just have to cross fingers that the recovery goes more smoothly this time.

He looks incredible. His testing at the combine was great too.

Think we've got a serious player here.

Has McKenzie re-signed yet? Haven't seen anything about him.

Well that's a guaranteed round one loss.

Lined up how? Trade period done Draftees rarely ready to assume key roles - esp talls for example Van Es I am not sure a pick 60 odd will be better than Highmore even if Highmore is just a back up to Wilkie and Battle? Ie/Adams and Connolly were late picks - weren’t even great VFL players. You can ...

They must have someone lined up that they think is better backup.

Is McKenzie even a guarantee to be on the list? Don't think he has a contract yet.

Hey B.M. just wondering what you thought of the Billings trade? Would be interested to hear your thoughts as you haven't commented on the matter yet (more than 100 times).

I wouldn’t do a deal detrimental to the StK FC Melbourne only gives us chicken feed for him - they pay his salary If the overpay with DP then I’d be happy to pay part of his salary - it’d be like pick purchasing As it was we were bent over SOS was more worried about getting to the airport to catch ...

I was waiting for someone to bring up Collingwood Just because they won the premiership Does that justify the list management mistakes they made They absolutely fked up with Treloar and Grundy and they know it! They fixed it by bringing in Mitchell to some degree Do you think upon reflection they a...

The Sheil deal was only pallapable IF Bombers gave OVERS for Gresham thusly pumping up our compo...they did not want to do that after ALREADY dojng exactly this for North. So keep Sheil's high salary, bung body and suck it. They did pay overs for Gresh didn't they? Reported as 700k a year. I reckon...

It looks like we sweetened it for Essendon for paying overs for Gresh