Jon Ralph on our rucks

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8578
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765020Post kosifantutti »

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ ... ee5a42f321

Doesn't tell us anything 99% of us didn't know already. Our rucks are a real problem.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5834
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 822 times
Been thanked: 777 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765025Post samuraisaint »

kosifantutti wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 1:00pm https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/ ... ee5a42f321

Doesn't tell us anything 99% of us didn't know already. Our rucks are a real problem.
Our rucks? Or their development?


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765030Post st.byron »

Can't get past Murdoch's paywall


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11231
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765040Post Bernard Shakey »

Lewie will be the saviour!


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2973
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 760 times
Been thanked: 402 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765042Post shrodes »

st.byron wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 1:59pm Can't get past Murdoch's paywall
Brand new pro-tip. Put outline.com/ in front of the link.

https://outline.com/PFmURB


chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765045Post chico2001 »

Good summary and shows you how little some of these so called ex players on here know. But still...they will continue to overpraise those who will never improve. At least there is improvement left in lewis and big upside for Marshall and a few others. Lethlean and the other duds have really cocked this trading period up.


chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765046Post chico2001 »

shrodes wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 3:13pm
st.byron wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 1:59pm Can't get past Murdoch's paywall
Brand new pro-tip. Put outline.com/ in front of the link.

https://outline.com/PFmURB
cheers for that Shrodes


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765050Post sunsaint »

I think a writer at the HeraldSun is going to need a body guard for awhile


Seeya
*************
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765065Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

We need one more ruck. A state league ruck that can play is on the radar.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765068Post chico2001 »

Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.


stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765072Post stonecold »

Jon Who????? ;)


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
Crossy66
Club Player
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765073Post Crossy66 »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks


stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765074Post stonecold »

Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765077Post st.byron »

shrodes wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 3:13pm
st.byron wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 1:59pm Can't get past Murdoch's paywall
Brand new pro-tip. Put outline.com/ in front of the link.

https://outline.com/PFmURB
Awesome. Thanks shrodes. Much appreciated.


chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765080Post chico2001 »

stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)


Crossy66
Club Player
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765083Post Crossy66 »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
You didnt compare him to anyone.
Also less disposals than lewie
Why do you want him?


stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765091Post stonecold »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
Well then, compare him to Longer in 2017, when Billy was fit!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765093Post chico2001 »

stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:28pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
Well then, compare him to Longer in 2017, when Billy was fit!!!!!
Hitouts, hitouts and hitouts and Longer averages 8 disposals a game over his career, 1 mark per game..etc etc.....Preuss was an option that is what I am saying. If the saints did not want him as you state then the Dees have made a big mistake. If you look at it sensibly which you cant, Preuss never got a game in 2018 because Goldstein was in outstanding form all year, played 22 games etc ...Go and have a look at his stats if that is your bent, then ask yourself if any St Kilda ruckman would have got a senior game at North in 2018 even if fit!!!!!


Shaggy
Club Player
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765103Post Shaggy »

I am so glad we have taken a risk on our young rucks. It is time. Hickey is 27 years old.

I think Marshall is special.

Longer lacks confidence but with Hickey gone it may be what he needs.

Lewie deserves a run as well.

Interesting those who are pessimistic about the Saints are also not happy about giving our younger rucks a go next year.

I am so glad we are going to run with the risk even if the pessimists piss their pants.


Crossy66
Club Player
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765104Post Crossy66 »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:58pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:28pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
Well then, compare him to Longer in 2017, when Billy was fit!!!!!
Hitouts, hitouts and hitouts and Longer averages 8 disposals a game over his career, 1 mark per game..etc etc.....Preuss was an option that is what I am saying. If the saints did not want him as you state then the Dees have made a big mistake. If you look at it sensibly which you cant, Preuss never got a game in 2018 because Goldstein was in outstanding form all year, played 22 games etc ...Go and have a look at his stats if that is your bent, then ask yourself if any St Kilda ruckman would have got a senior game at North in 2018 even if fit!!!!!
Seems the narrative has changed. You said you wanted to recruit Preuss, i just asked why you wanted him when statistically he is worse or no better than the three rucks we have on our list. You raised Longer, i didnt. You tell me he statistically is Longers equal. The same bloke you reckon is a dud.
Dees havent made a mistake, they wanted to recruit a back up ruckman to play in the VFL as insurance if Gawn goes down - smart move, and gives you some idea of how Preuss rates himself. I have no problem with Goldstein, Been very good for a long time, but it doesnt change the fact that Preuss hasnt played an AFL game for a long time. Glad you are not doing our recruiting Chico!


stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765106Post stonecold »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:58pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:28pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
Well then, compare him to Longer in 2017, when Billy was fit!!!!!
Hitouts, hitouts and hitouts and Longer averages 8 disposals a game over his career, 1 mark per game..etc etc.....Preuss was an option that is what I am saying. If the saints did not want him as you state then the Dees have made a big mistake. If you look at it sensibly which you cant, Preuss never got a game in 2018 because Goldstein was in outstanding form all year, played 22 games etc ...Go and have a look at his stats if that is your bent, then ask yourself if any St Kilda ruckman would have got a senior game at North in 2018 even if fit!!!!!
Whatever, Billy has a contract at St.Kilda, Preuss has not, neither has Hickey, I'll stick with those thoughts of the 'Real Experts' and those close to the coal face, not those on a Fan Forum or in newspaper's!!!!! No offence intended, however, I am closer to the 'coal face' than you or others I believe!!!!!

So I'm content with the decision and as I stated previously it was always going to go that way!!!!!

Hate saying I told you so, but guess what, I did!!!!!

You really need to stop Trolling on here and head back to the club you support, no offence intended!!!!!

I'm f****** sick of this forum becoming an open opportunity to 'bag the club' at every decision that is made, some of you 'so called' supporters really need to put up, get on or f*** off really!!!!!

No offence intended, but that's how I see it!!!!!

It's OK to have an opinion, sure, however it's not OK to be a bitter supporter, cause there's no such thing really!!!!!


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765124Post Wayne42 »

From the Ralph article..

In Longer’s five games this year only his hitout-to advantage statistics were considered by Champion Data to be average — 7.4 per game.
His disposal rate (6.4), contested possessions (2.8), clearance rate (.2) and score involvements were rated poor, his intercept mark rate (0.4) rated below average.
In those five games he took a total of five marks, Grundy besting his 32 possessions for the year in just one Round 4 game against Adelaide (33 possessions). :shock: :shock:

The Saints definitely have issues with the quality of their contracted ruckmen for 2019. Hopefully all these off field additions can transform our ruckmen into
AFL quality players.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
stonecold
SS Life Member
Posts: 3950
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2015 3:12pm
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 214 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765128Post stonecold »

Wayne42 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 11:08pm From the Ralph article..

In Longer’s five games this year only his hitout-to advantage statistics were considered by Champion Data to be average — 7.4 per game.
His disposal rate (6.4), contested possessions (2.8), clearance rate (.2) and score involvements were rated poor, his intercept mark rate (0.4) rated below average.
In those five games he took a total of five marks, Grundy besting his 32 possessions for the year in just one Round 4 game against Adelaide (33 possessions). :shock: :shock:

The Saints definitely have issues with the quality of their contracted ruckmen for 2019. Hopefully all these off field additions can transform our ruckmen into
AFL quality players.
Again, all stats from a few games playing injured, let's see how it all pans out next year?????


'Cause StoneCold Said So'!!!!!

We will be great again once Billy is back playing!!!!!


The 'Last Post', it's the gift that keeps giving 📯📯📯📯📯
chico2001
Club Player
Posts: 988
Joined: Fri 18 May 2018 10:06am
Has thanked: 210 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765136Post chico2001 »

Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 8:45pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:58pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:28pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
Well then, compare him to Longer in 2017, when Billy was fit!!!!!
Hitouts, hitouts and hitouts and Longer averages 8 disposals a game over his career, 1 mark per game..etc etc.....Preuss was an option that is what I am saying. If the saints did not want him as you state then the Dees have made a big mistake. If you look at it sensibly which you cant, Preuss never got a game in 2018 because Goldstein was in outstanding form all year, played 22 games etc ...Go and have a look at his stats if that is your bent, then ask yourself if any St Kilda ruckman would have got a senior game at North in 2018 even if fit!!!!!
Seems the narrative has changed. You said you wanted to recruit Preuss, i just asked why you wanted him when statistically he is worse or no better than the three rucks we have on our list. You raised Longer, i didnt. You tell me he statistically is Longers equal. The same bloke you reckon is a dud.
Dees havent made a mistake, they wanted to recruit a back up ruckman to play in the VFL as insurance if Gawn goes down - smart move, and gives you some idea of how Preuss rates himself. I have no problem with Goldstein, Been very good for a long time, but it doesnt change the fact that Preuss hasnt played an AFL game for a long time. Glad you are not doing our recruiting Chico!
First rule is...get your facts right. Dont twist the original post around and tell a blatant lie. Thats weak. I seen him as an option. Read my post properly. Where did I say I wanted to recruit him? So the narrative hasnt changed at all. You have tried to change it..but..no cigar. Preuss hasnt played an AFL game in 2018 and I gave a good reason, LIke I said, show me a ruckman from St KIlda who would have got a game before Goldstein at North in 2018, You didnt answer it then and you wont answer it in your next post either. So therefore a side that has a star ruckman that finished 4th recruits a back up ruckman, you reckon it is a smart move in your wisdom. A side that finished 16th with no ruck to speak of which is a known fact and they dont want to look at Preuss. Check out the saints recruiting in the last few years, let me know how they went. The 2nd rule for you is ..still dont lie


Crossy66
Club Player
Posts: 1094
Joined: Fri 28 Nov 2014 5:33pm
Has thanked: 331 times
Been thanked: 267 times

Re: Jon Ralph on our rucks

Post: # 1765141Post Crossy66 »

chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 11:45pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 8:45pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:58pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 7:28pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:56pm
stonecold wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 6:05pm
Crossy66 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:48pm
chico2001 wrote: Mon 29 Oct 2018 5:25pm Wonder why Preuss did not want to come to the saints. He was no star but was aggressive, good coordination, reasonable stats and had upside.
Did we want him? That might be your answer.
statistically inferior to rowan marshall.
Only played 8 games and none this year
Only ever Played in 1 win
Averages 8 disposals
Would rather play marshall thanks
Overated by many on here, not suprising!!!!!
I was comparing him to Bill Longer not Rowan Marshall….Marshall is a lock..:)
Well then, compare him to Longer in 2017, when Billy was fit!!!!!
Hitouts, hitouts and hitouts and Longer averages 8 disposals a game over his career, 1 mark per game..etc etc.....Preuss was an option that is what I am saying. If the saints did not want him as you state then the Dees have made a big mistake. If you look at it sensibly which you cant, Preuss never got a game in 2018 because Goldstein was in outstanding form all year, played 22 games etc ...Go and have a look at his stats if that is your bent, then ask yourself if any St Kilda ruckman would have got a senior game at North in 2018 even if fit!!!!!
Seems the narrative has changed. You said you wanted to recruit Preuss, i just asked why you wanted him when statistically he is worse or no better than the three rucks we have on our list. You raised Longer, i didnt. You tell me he statistically is Longers equal. The same bloke you reckon is a dud.
Dees havent made a mistake, they wanted to recruit a back up ruckman to play in the VFL as insurance if Gawn goes down - smart move, and gives you some idea of how Preuss rates himself. I have no problem with Goldstein, Been very good for a long time, but it doesnt change the fact that Preuss hasnt played an AFL game for a long time. Glad you are not doing our recruiting Chico!
First rule is...get your facts right. Dont twist the original post around and tell a blatant lie. Thats weak. I seen him as an option. Read my post properly. Where did I say I wanted to recruit him? So the narrative hasnt changed at all. You have tried to change it..but..no cigar. Preuss hasnt played an AFL game in 2018 and I gave a good reason, LIke I said, show me a ruckman from St KIlda who would have got a game before Goldstein at North in 2018, You didnt answer it then and you wont answer it in your next post either. So therefore a side that has a star ruckman that finished 4th recruits a back up ruckman, you reckon it is a smart move in your wisdom. A side that finished 16th with no ruck to speak of which is a known fact and they dont want to look at Preuss. Check out the saints recruiting in the last few years, let me know how they went. The 2nd rule for you is ..still dont lie
Geez chico, what is it your trying to say?
So you see pruess as an option but you do or dont want to recruit him y or n?

Melbourne recruit him to play vfl as insurance if gawn goes down- are you saying that's good or bad?.

Why keep raising goldstein? I just said that pruess is not an afl ruckman, hasnt played in over a year. Not debating whether goldstein is a good ruckman or not.
You shouldn't use the term" known fact" when referring to opinions.
Btw, because someone expresses a different point to yours doesn't make it a lie
Lastly , stkildas recruiting over the last few years has been pretty good imo (Carlisle, Gresham, Steele, Long, Battle, coffield, Clark, Austin, Rice. If you disagree what would you have done differently?
I just don't get your love for pruess that was my original point. Statistically worse or no better than the 3 rucks we have on our list, none of which you rate.
I could be wrong, but it seems that if they wear a saint's jumper they are duds, but if they play for someone else they're guns and our recruiting staff are failures for not recruiting them.
I would rather invest games into the likes of pierce or marshall rather than recruit a player that's statistically worse. Would you agree or disagree?
Last edited by Crossy66 on Tue 30 Oct 2018 8:48am, edited 1 time in total.


Post Reply